Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1
Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1 Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1
THE QUESTION OF JESUS' SELF-UNDERSTANDING §15.7 second case, for those familiar with the battles of exorcism, is the apparent attempt by the demoniac to put a spell on Jesus by calling on the power of God (5.7). It would occasion no surprise to those familiar with exorcistic technique that Jesus responded by asking for the demon's name (5.9). 286 4. 'The Holy One of God' (1.24) is hardly a common title for Christ, 287 so attribution to later Christian faith is less obvious. And conceivably the exorcistic power of one reputed to be a holy man might have occasioned such an address. 288 Not so very different is the case with the phrase 'son of God Most High' (5.7). 289 Theos hypsistos was a title which stretched across cultural lines, 290 so one might wonder whether its unique appearance in the Jesus tradition at this point is to be attributed to retellers of the Jesus tradition recognizing its appropriateness for a setting in the mixed culture of the Decapolis territory. 291 At the same time, the appearance of the phrase in 4Q246 indicates that it was quite 'at home' in a Jewish Palestinian milieu. 292 5. The command to silence (1.25) also functions less as the expression of a 'messianic secret' and more as part of the verbal duel. 293 The silencing of the demoniac/demon 294 is a necessary preliminary to the successful exorcism. 286. PGM 1.160-62; 4.3037-39. Typically in the Testament of Solomon, Solomon asks the demon's name (to gain a 'handle on' the demon — 2.1, 4; 4.3; 6.3, 5-7; 8; 9.2; 11.3-4, etc.) and also ascertains the name of one who is stronger (title: 'what their authorities are against men, and by what angels these demons are thwarted'; 2.4; 4.10, 12; 5.9, 13; 6.8; 8.5-10; 11.6; 13.3-7; 14.7; 15.3, 6; 16.6, etc.). 287. Apart from Mark 1.24/Luke 4.34, only John 6.69 and Acts 3.14. 288. The point depends more on a history-of-religions perspective, although we should recall that Elijah was similarly challenged ('What have you against me, O man of God?' 1 Kgs. 17.18), Elisha is described as 'a holy man of God' (2 Kgs. 4.9) (see also Kollmann, Jesus 203- 204), and one of the two charismatic rabbis to whom Vermes has drawn particular attention, Hanina ben Dosa, had something of a reputation for exercising authority over demons (Vermes, Jesus the Jew 65-80, 208-209). Presumably 'the seven sons of the Sceva' traded on the sanctity of Sceva's high priestly status to induce the same sense of the numinous in their role as itinerant exorcists (Acts 19.13-14). Of the exorcists referred to in Matt. 12.27/Luke 11.19 and Mark 9.38 we know nothing. 289. Cf. Vermes, Jesus the Jew 202-203, 206-10. Since Solomon was the one to whom the promise of 2 Sam. 7.14 originally applied, it is conceivable that a son of David who cast out demons might be addressed as 'son of God'; but supporting evidence is lacking. 290. BDAG, hypsistos 2. 291. The only other two NT occurrences are Acts 16.17 (again on the lips of a demoniac shortly to be exorcised) and Heb. 7.1. 292. See below, chapter 16 n. 15. 293. PGM 3.204; 5.321-29 (Theissen, Miracle Stories 140-41). 294. Literally 'be muzzled'. Examples of its use in the magical papyri in Twelftree, Jesus the Exorcist 69-70. 676
- Page 1340: THE QUESTION OF JESUS' SELF-UNDERST
- Page 1344: THE QUESTION OF JESUS SELF-UNDERSTA
- Page 1348: THE QUESTION OF JESUS' SELF-UNDERST
- Page 1352: THE QUESTION OF JESUS' SELF-UNDERST
- Page 1356: THE QUESTION OF JESUS SELF-UNDERSTA
- Page 1360: THE QUESTION OF JESUS' SELF-UNDERST
- Page 1364: THE QUESTION OF JESUS' SELF-UNDERST
- Page 1368: THE QUESTION OF JESUS' SELF-UNDERST
- Page 1372: THE QUESTION OF JESUS' SELF-UNDERST
- Page 1376: THE QUESTION OF JESUS' SELF-UNDERST
- Page 1380: . Jesus' Reputation THE QUESTION OF
- Page 1384: THE QUESTION OF JESUS' SELF-UNDERST
- Page 1388: THE QUESTION OF JESUS' SELF-UNDERST
- Page 1394: §15.7 Who Did They Think Jesus Was
- Page 1398: §15.7 Who Did They Think Jesus Was
- Page 1402: §15.7 Who Did They Think Jesus Was
- Page 1406: §15.7 Who Did They Think Jesus Was
- Page 1410: §15.7 Who Did They Think Jesus Was
- Page 1414: §15.7 Who Did They Think Jesus Was
- Page 1418: §15.7 Who Did They Think Jesus Was
- Page 1422: §15.7 Who Did They Think Jesus Was
- Page 1426: §15.7 Who Did They Think Jesus Was
- Page 1430: §15.7 Who Did They Think Jesus Was
- Page 1434: §15.8 Who Did They Think Jesus Was
- Page 1438: §15.8 Who Did They Think Jesus Was
THE QUESTION OF JESUS' SELF-UNDERSTANDING §15.7<br />
second case, for those familiar with <strong>the</strong> battles of exorcism, is <strong>the</strong> apparent<br />
attempt by <strong>the</strong> demoniac to put a spell on <strong>Jesus</strong> by call<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>the</strong> power of<br />
God (5.7). It would occasion no surprise to those familiar with exorcistic<br />
technique that <strong>Jesus</strong> responded by ask<strong>in</strong>g for <strong>the</strong> demon's name (5.9). 286<br />
4. 'The Holy One of God' (1.24) is hardly a common title for Christ, 287 so attribution<br />
to later Christian faith is less obvious. And conceivably <strong>the</strong><br />
exorcistic power of one reputed to be a holy man might have occasioned<br />
such an address. 288 Not so very different is <strong>the</strong> case with <strong>the</strong> phrase 'son of<br />
God Most High' (5.7). 289 Theos hypsistos was a title which stretched across<br />
cultural l<strong>in</strong>es, 290 so one might wonder whe<strong>the</strong>r its unique appearance <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>Jesus</strong> tradition at this po<strong>in</strong>t is to be attributed to retellers of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Jesus</strong> tradition<br />
recogniz<strong>in</strong>g its appropriateness for a sett<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> mixed culture of <strong>the</strong><br />
Decapolis territory. 291 At <strong>the</strong> same time, <strong>the</strong> appearance of <strong>the</strong> phrase <strong>in</strong><br />
4Q246 <strong>in</strong>dicates that it was quite 'at home' <strong>in</strong> a Jewish Palest<strong>in</strong>ian milieu. 292<br />
5. The command to silence (1.25) also functions less as <strong>the</strong> expression of a<br />
'messianic secret' and more as part of <strong>the</strong> verbal duel. 293 The silenc<strong>in</strong>g of<br />
<strong>the</strong> demoniac/demon 294 is a necessary prelim<strong>in</strong>ary to <strong>the</strong> successful exorcism.<br />
286. PGM 1.160-62; 4.3037-39. Typically <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Testament of Solomon, Solomon asks<br />
<strong>the</strong> demon's name (to ga<strong>in</strong> a 'handle on' <strong>the</strong> demon — 2.1, 4; 4.3; 6.3, 5-7; 8; 9.2; 11.3-4, etc.)<br />
and also ascerta<strong>in</strong>s <strong>the</strong> name of one who is stronger (title: 'what <strong>the</strong>ir authorities are aga<strong>in</strong>st<br />
men, and by what angels <strong>the</strong>se demons are thwarted'; 2.4; 4.10, 12; 5.9, 13; 6.8; 8.5-10; 11.6;<br />
13.3-7; 14.7; 15.3, 6; 16.6, etc.).<br />
287. Apart from Mark 1.24/Luke 4.34, only John 6.69 and Acts 3.14.<br />
288. The po<strong>in</strong>t depends more on a history-of-religions perspective, although we should<br />
recall that Elijah was similarly challenged ('What have you aga<strong>in</strong>st me, O man of God?' 1 Kgs.<br />
17.18), Elisha is described as 'a holy man of God' (2 Kgs. 4.9) (see also Kollmann, <strong>Jesus</strong> 203-<br />
204), and one of <strong>the</strong> two charismatic rabbis to whom Vermes has drawn particular attention,<br />
Han<strong>in</strong>a ben Dosa, had someth<strong>in</strong>g of a reputation for exercis<strong>in</strong>g authority over demons (Vermes,<br />
<strong>Jesus</strong> <strong>the</strong> Jew 65-80, 208-209). Presumably '<strong>the</strong> seven sons of <strong>the</strong> Sceva' traded on <strong>the</strong> sanctity<br />
of Sceva's high priestly status to <strong>in</strong>duce <strong>the</strong> same sense of <strong>the</strong> num<strong>in</strong>ous <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir role as it<strong>in</strong>erant<br />
exorcists (Acts 19.13-14). Of <strong>the</strong> exorcists referred to <strong>in</strong> Matt. 12.27/Luke 11.19 and Mark 9.38<br />
we know noth<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
289. Cf. Vermes, <strong>Jesus</strong> <strong>the</strong> Jew 202-203, 206-10. S<strong>in</strong>ce Solomon was <strong>the</strong> one to whom<br />
<strong>the</strong> promise of 2 Sam. 7.14 orig<strong>in</strong>ally applied, it is conceivable that a son of David who cast out<br />
demons might be addressed as 'son of God'; but support<strong>in</strong>g evidence is lack<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
290. BDAG, hypsistos 2.<br />
291. The only o<strong>the</strong>r two NT occurrences are Acts 16.17 (aga<strong>in</strong> on <strong>the</strong> lips of a demoniac<br />
shortly to be exorcised) and Heb. 7.1.<br />
292. See below, chapter 16 n. 15.<br />
293. PGM 3.204; 5.321-29 (Theissen, Miracle Stories 140-41).<br />
294. Literally 'be muzzled'. Examples of its use <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> magical papyri <strong>in</strong> Twelftree, <strong>Jesus</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> Exorcist 69-70.<br />
676