Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1 Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

khazarzar.skeptik.net
from khazarzar.skeptik.net More from this publisher
09.02.2013 Views

THE QUESTION OF JESUS SELF-UNDERSTANDING §15.6 pars.) 198 both assume that John was widely seen as a prophet. 199 If John was thought to be a prophet, then it would be natural for the same speculation to be voiced in regard to Jesus. (4) Also not irrelevant is the fact that Josephus speaks of prophets active during the decades leading up to the Jewish revolt and the destruction of Jerusalem. The two for whom he uses the term 'prophet' both intended to reenact miracles of the entry into the Promised Land: Theudas, to part the river Jordan and provide his followers 200 an easy passage (presumably back into the land) (Ant. 20.97); and 'the Egyptian', 'who had gained for himself the reputation of a prophet' (War 2.261) and who predicted that at his command the walls of Jerusalem would fall down to provide his followers 201 entry into the city (Ant. 20.169- 70). Josephus also refers to others who promised 'signs of deliverance', 202 and though he does not describe them all as prophets, the recent practice of classifying them all as 'sign prophets' is quite justified. 203 This, together with the relating to the Baptist, provides sufficient evidence that the category of 'prophet' was still a viable one at the time of Jesus. 204 It would have been surprising had there had been no attempt to 'fit' Jesus to it. (5) There is a firm if confusing tradition that Jesus was asked for a 'sign'. Matt. 12.38-42 38 Then some of the scribes and Pharisees said to him, 'Teacher, we wish to see a sign from you'. 39 But he answered them, Matt. 16.1-2,4 1 And the Pharisees and Sadducees came, and to test him thev asked him to show them a sign from heaven. 2 He answered them, Mark 8.11-12 11 The Pharisees came and began to argue with him, seeking from him a sign from heaven, to test him. 12 And he sighed deeply in his spirit, and Luke 11.16,29-32 . . . 16 while others, to test him. sought from him a sign from heaven. 29 When the crowds were increasing, he began to say, 198. But opinion is divided on the historical value of the passage; see, e.g., Bultmann, History 189; Perrin, Rediscovering 75; Fitzmyer, Luke 2.1272-73; Funk, Five Gospels 100; Davies and Allison, Matthew 3.157-58; LUdemann, Jesus 80. 199. Josephus does not call the Baptist a 'prophet', but that may well be because he regarded the category as dubious ('sign prophets'), whereas he respected John (§11.2a). 200. Josephus speaks of 'the very great crowd', or 'the greatest part of the crowd' (as in Matt. 21.8; cf. Mark 4.1); but Acts 5.36 numbers Theudas's followers at only about 400. 201. War 2.261 puts the figure at 30,000; Acts 21.38 at 4,000. 202. War 2.258-60 = Ant. 20.168; Ant. 20.188; War 6.285-87 ('many prophets'); 7.437-41. 203. Particularly P. W. Barnett, 'The Jewish Sign Prophets — AD 40-70 — Their Intentions and Origin', NTS 27 (1981) 679-97; and Gray, Prophetic Figures 112-44. 204. It is now generally recognized that the idea of the prophetic Spirit having been withdrawn (with reference to the very variegated evidence of Ps. 74.9; Zech. 13.2-3; 1 Mace. 4.45-46; 9.27; 2 Bar. 85.1-13) has been much exaggerated; see particularly J. Levison, 'Did the Spirit Withdraw from Israel? An Evaluation of the Earliest Jewish Data', NTS 43 (1997) 35-57. 658

THE QUESTION OF JESUS SELF-UNDERSTANDING<br />

§15.6<br />

pars.) 198 both assume that John was widely seen as a prophet. 199 If John was<br />

thought to be a prophet, <strong>the</strong>n it would be natural for <strong>the</strong> same speculation to be<br />

voiced <strong>in</strong> regard to <strong>Jesus</strong>.<br />

(4) Also not irrelevant is <strong>the</strong> fact that Josephus speaks of prophets active<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> decades lead<strong>in</strong>g up to <strong>the</strong> Jewish re<strong>vol</strong>t and <strong>the</strong> destruction of Jerusalem.<br />

The two for whom he uses <strong>the</strong> term 'prophet' both <strong>in</strong>tended to reenact miracles<br />

of <strong>the</strong> entry <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> Promised Land: Theudas, to part <strong>the</strong> river Jordan and<br />

provide his followers 200 an easy passage (presumably back <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> land) (Ant.<br />

20.97); and '<strong>the</strong> Egyptian', 'who had ga<strong>in</strong>ed for himself <strong>the</strong> reputation of a<br />

prophet' (War 2.261) and who predicted that at his command <strong>the</strong> walls of Jerusalem<br />

would fall down to provide his followers 201 entry <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> city (Ant. 20.169-<br />

70). Josephus also refers to o<strong>the</strong>rs who promised 'signs of deliverance', 202 and<br />

though he does not describe <strong>the</strong>m all as prophets, <strong>the</strong> recent practice of classify<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>the</strong>m all as 'sign prophets' is quite justified. 203 This, toge<strong>the</strong>r with <strong>the</strong> relat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to <strong>the</strong> Baptist, provides sufficient evidence that <strong>the</strong> category of 'prophet' was<br />

still a viable one at <strong>the</strong> time of <strong>Jesus</strong>. 204 It would have been surpris<strong>in</strong>g had <strong>the</strong>re<br />

had been no attempt to 'fit' <strong>Jesus</strong> to it.<br />

(5) There is a firm if confus<strong>in</strong>g tradition that <strong>Jesus</strong> was asked for a 'sign'.<br />

Matt. 12.38-42<br />

38 Then some of <strong>the</strong><br />

scribes and Pharisees<br />

said to him, 'Teacher,<br />

we wish to see a sign<br />

from you'.<br />

39 But he answered<br />

<strong>the</strong>m,<br />

Matt. 16.1-2,4<br />

1 And <strong>the</strong> Pharisees<br />

and Sadducees came,<br />

and to test him <strong>the</strong>v<br />

asked him to<br />

show <strong>the</strong>m a sign<br />

from heaven.<br />

2 He answered <strong>the</strong>m,<br />

Mark 8.11-12<br />

11 The Pharisees<br />

came and began to<br />

argue with him,<br />

seek<strong>in</strong>g from him a<br />

sign from heaven, to<br />

test him.<br />

12 And he sighed<br />

deeply <strong>in</strong> his spirit, and<br />

Luke 11.16,29-32<br />

. . . 16 while<br />

o<strong>the</strong>rs, to test him.<br />

sought from him a<br />

sign from heaven.<br />

29 When <strong>the</strong> crowds<br />

were <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g, he<br />

began to say,<br />

198. But op<strong>in</strong>ion is divided on <strong>the</strong> historical value of <strong>the</strong> passage; see, e.g., Bultmann,<br />

History 189; Perr<strong>in</strong>, Rediscover<strong>in</strong>g 75; Fitzmyer, Luke 2.1272-73; Funk, Five Gospels 100;<br />

Davies and Allison, Mat<strong>the</strong>w 3.157-58; LUdemann, <strong>Jesus</strong> 80.<br />

199. Josephus does not call <strong>the</strong> Baptist a 'prophet', but that may well be because he regarded<br />

<strong>the</strong> category as dubious ('sign prophets'), whereas he respected John (§11.2a).<br />

200. Josephus speaks of '<strong>the</strong> very great crowd', or '<strong>the</strong> greatest part of <strong>the</strong> crowd' (as <strong>in</strong><br />

Matt. 21.8; cf. Mark 4.1); but Acts 5.36 numbers Theudas's followers at only about 400.<br />

201. War 2.261 puts <strong>the</strong> figure at 30,000; Acts 21.38 at 4,000.<br />

202. War 2.258-60 = Ant. 20.168; Ant. 20.188; War 6.285-87 ('many prophets'); 7.437-41.<br />

203. Particularly P. W. Barnett, 'The Jewish Sign Prophets — AD 40-70 — Their Intentions<br />

and Orig<strong>in</strong>', NTS 27 (1981) 679-97; and Gray, Prophetic Figures 112-44.<br />

204. It is now generally recognized that <strong>the</strong> idea of <strong>the</strong> prophetic Spirit hav<strong>in</strong>g been<br />

withdrawn (with reference to <strong>the</strong> very variegated evidence of Ps. 74.9; Zech. 13.2-3; 1 Mace.<br />

4.45-46; 9.27; 2 Bar. 85.1-13) has been much exaggerated; see particularly J. Levison, 'Did <strong>the</strong><br />

Spirit Withdraw from Israel? An Evaluation of <strong>the</strong> Earliest Jewish Data', NTS 43 (1997) 35-57.<br />

658

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!