Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1 Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

khazarzar.skeptik.net
from khazarzar.skeptik.net More from this publisher
09.02.2013 Views

THE QUESTION OF JESUS' SELF-UNDERSTANDING §15.5 its reference was too clear, in which case Jesus seems to have declined it. Or its reference was unclear, in which case the debate as to whether Jesus laid claim to it does not advance the discussion very far. And though the first Christians certainly did use it, they did so only by transforming its reference in the light of Jesus' teaching and death. But if our concern is to know what Jesus thought on the matter as the best explanation for the impact which he made as attested by the Jesus tradition, it is as well to focus our attention elsewhere. 15.5. Priestly Messiah For the sake of completeness we need at least to mention this further strand of Jewish expectation at the time of Jesus. For from various sources it is evident that some of Jesus' contemporaries invested considerable hope in the other most prominent anointed figure in the life of ancient Israel — the anointed priest. The development is usually traced back to Zechariah 4, where two anointeds are envisaged, not only Zerubbabel, the royal figure, but also Joshua the high priest. 177 The influence of Zechariah's vision is already evident in ben Sira 45-50, 178 but comes to full flower in the Testaments of the 12 Patriarchs, where Levi (the priest) is superior to Judah (the king), 179 and in the Qumran scrolls, where the priestly Messiah (the Messiah of Aaron) takes precedence over the Messiah of Israel. 180 From the perspective of the present study, the most striking feature of this messianic expectation is that it was apparently never seen as an option for Jesus. Presumably this was because it was well enough known that Jesus was not of the appropriate tribe; he was not descended from Levi. Equally notable is the fact that when the possibility of presenting Jesus as (high) priest is followed up, the author to the Hebrews has to develop a unique argument: Jesus does not belong to the priestly order of Aaron, but to that of the mysterious Melchizedek (Heb. 4.14-5.10; 7). 177. Hesse, TDNT 9.500-501, 507-508. 178. 49.11-12; Aaron is extolled at greater length (45.6-22) than David (47.2-11). 179. Most clearly T. Jud. 21.2-4: the Lord 'set the kingship beneath the priesthood. . .. As heaven is higher than the earth, so is the priesthood of God higher than the kingship on the earth'; full detail in Hollander and de Jonge, Testaments 56-61, 222. A small fragment of T. Levi reads 'the kingdom of priesthood is greater than the kingdom . . .' (1Q21 [lQTLevi ar] Fragment 1). 180. 'The Messiah of Aaron': 1QS 9.11. In lQSa (lQ28a) 2.17-21 the Messiah of Aaron stretches out his hand to the bread before the Messiah of Israel; in lQSb (lQ28b) the blessing of the high priest precedes that of the prince of the congregation (see further Collins, Scepter and Star 74-77, 83-95). 654

THE QUESTION OF JESUS' SELF-UNDERSTANDING §15.5<br />

its reference was too clear, <strong>in</strong> which case <strong>Jesus</strong> seems to have decl<strong>in</strong>ed it. Or its<br />

reference was unclear, <strong>in</strong> which case <strong>the</strong> debate as to whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>Jesus</strong> laid claim to<br />

it does not advance <strong>the</strong> discussion very far. And though <strong>the</strong> first Christians certa<strong>in</strong>ly<br />

did use it, <strong>the</strong>y did so only by transform<strong>in</strong>g its reference <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> light of <strong>Jesus</strong>'<br />

teach<strong>in</strong>g and death. But if our concern is to know what <strong>Jesus</strong> thought on <strong>the</strong><br />

matter as <strong>the</strong> best explanation for <strong>the</strong> impact which he made as attested by <strong>the</strong> <strong>Jesus</strong><br />

tradition, it is as well to focus our attention elsewhere.<br />

15.5. Priestly Messiah<br />

For <strong>the</strong> sake of completeness we need at least to mention this fur<strong>the</strong>r strand of<br />

Jewish expectation at <strong>the</strong> time of <strong>Jesus</strong>. For from various sources it is evident that<br />

some of <strong>Jesus</strong>' contemporaries <strong>in</strong>vested considerable hope <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r most<br />

prom<strong>in</strong>ent ano<strong>in</strong>ted figure <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> life of ancient Israel — <strong>the</strong> ano<strong>in</strong>ted priest. The<br />

development is usually traced back to Zechariah 4, where two ano<strong>in</strong>teds are envisaged,<br />

not only Zerubbabel, <strong>the</strong> royal figure, but also Joshua <strong>the</strong> high priest. 177<br />

The <strong>in</strong>fluence of Zechariah's vision is already evident <strong>in</strong> ben Sira 45-50, 178 but<br />

comes to full flower <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Testaments of <strong>the</strong> 12 Patriarchs, where Levi (<strong>the</strong><br />

priest) is superior to Judah (<strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>g), 179 and <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Qumran scrolls, where <strong>the</strong><br />

priestly Messiah (<strong>the</strong> Messiah of Aaron) takes precedence over <strong>the</strong> Messiah of<br />

Israel. 180<br />

From <strong>the</strong> perspective of <strong>the</strong> present study, <strong>the</strong> most strik<strong>in</strong>g feature of this<br />

messianic expectation is that it was apparently never seen as an option for <strong>Jesus</strong>.<br />

Presumably this was because it was well enough known that <strong>Jesus</strong> was not of <strong>the</strong><br />

appropriate tribe; he was not descended from Levi. Equally notable is <strong>the</strong> fact<br />

that when <strong>the</strong> possibility of present<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Jesus</strong> as (high) priest is followed up, <strong>the</strong><br />

author to <strong>the</strong> Hebrews has to develop a unique argument: <strong>Jesus</strong> does not belong<br />

to <strong>the</strong> priestly order of Aaron, but to that of <strong>the</strong> mysterious Melchizedek (Heb.<br />

4.14-5.10; 7).<br />

177. Hesse, TDNT 9.500-501, 507-508.<br />

178. 49.11-12; Aaron is extolled at greater length (45.6-22) than David (47.2-11).<br />

179. Most clearly T. Jud. 21.2-4: <strong>the</strong> Lord 'set <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>gship beneath <strong>the</strong> priesthood. . ..<br />

As heaven is higher than <strong>the</strong> earth, so is <strong>the</strong> priesthood of God higher than <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>gship on <strong>the</strong><br />

earth'; full detail <strong>in</strong> Hollander and de Jonge, Testaments 56-61, 222. A small fragment of<br />

T. Levi reads '<strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>gdom of priesthood is greater than <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>gdom . . .' (1Q21 [lQTLevi ar]<br />

Fragment 1).<br />

180. 'The Messiah of Aaron': 1QS 9.11. In lQSa (lQ28a) 2.17-21 <strong>the</strong> Messiah of<br />

Aaron stretches out his hand to <strong>the</strong> bread before <strong>the</strong> Messiah of Israel; <strong>in</strong> lQSb (lQ28b) <strong>the</strong><br />

bless<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> high priest precedes that of <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ce of <strong>the</strong> congregation (see fur<strong>the</strong>r Coll<strong>in</strong>s,<br />

Scepter and Star 74-77, 83-95).<br />

654

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!