09.02.2013 Views

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FAITH AND THE HISTORICAL JESUS §4.4<br />

'source'). 73 The case is generally reckoned to have been firmly established for<br />

German scholarship by H. J. Holtzmann <strong>in</strong> 1863 (when he was just 31), 74<br />

though <strong>the</strong> case he made for Markan priority was less effective than has usually<br />

been appreciated, and <strong>the</strong> full significance of Q was not grasped <strong>in</strong>itially. 75 In<br />

any case, English-speak<strong>in</strong>g readers have generally depended on <strong>the</strong> much later<br />

treatment by B. H. Streeter. 76<br />

The basic considerations adduced by Holtzmann have rema<strong>in</strong>ed more or<br />

less <strong>the</strong> same s<strong>in</strong>ce. 77 For <strong>the</strong> priority of Mark three features told <strong>in</strong> particular.<br />

(1) The fact that so much of Mark appears also <strong>in</strong> Mat<strong>the</strong>w and Luke: Holtzmann<br />

reckoned that only thirty Markan verses do not appear <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r two Gospels.<br />

(2) The order of episodes: when <strong>the</strong> three Gospels are compared, <strong>in</strong> each case<br />

it appears that <strong>the</strong> Markan order is primary. (3) The form of <strong>the</strong> episodes: likewise<br />

when <strong>the</strong> three Gospels are compared, aga<strong>in</strong> and aga<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Markan version<br />

seems to be more primitive. For <strong>the</strong> existence of Q two features proved most significant.<br />

(1) The pr<strong>in</strong>cipal fact that some two hundred verses <strong>in</strong> Mat<strong>the</strong>w and<br />

Luke are substantially <strong>the</strong> same or virtually identical, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g some doublets<br />

with say<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> Mark. 78 (2) Whereas <strong>the</strong> Q material has been grouped by Mat<strong>the</strong>w<br />

<strong>in</strong> several composite discourses, it is scattered through Luke. 79 Taken to-<br />

73. F. Neirynck attributes <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>troduction of <strong>the</strong> term 'Q' <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> debate on Synoptic<br />

sources (as shorthand for <strong>the</strong> Logia source) to E. Simon <strong>in</strong> 1880 ('Note on <strong>the</strong> Siglum Q',<br />

Evangelica II [BETL 99; Leuven: Leuven University, 1991] 474); see fur<strong>the</strong>r D. Liihrmann,<br />

'Q: Say<strong>in</strong>gs of <strong>Jesus</strong> or Logia?', <strong>in</strong> R. A. Piper, ed., The Gospel beh<strong>in</strong>d <strong>the</strong> Gospels: Current<br />

Studies on Q (NovTSup 75; Leiden: Brill, 1995) 97-116.<br />

74. H. J. Holtzmann, Die synoptischen Evangelien: ihr Ursprung und ihr geschichtlicher<br />

Charakter (Leipzig: Englemann, 1863). Holtzmann did not use <strong>the</strong> symbol 'Q' but referred<br />

to <strong>the</strong> 'Logia' or 'Say<strong>in</strong>gs collection' (Spruchsammlung). For <strong>the</strong> broader picture, see<br />

Dungan, History 326-32.<br />

75. J. S. Kloppenborg Verb<strong>in</strong>, Excavat<strong>in</strong>g Q: The History and Sett<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> Say<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

Gospel (M<strong>in</strong>neapolis: Fortress, 2000) 300-309.<br />

76. B. H. Streeter, The Four Gospels: A Study of Orig<strong>in</strong>s (London: Macmillan, 1924).<br />

Streeter was build<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>the</strong> work of Oxford scholars, particularly J. C. Hawk<strong>in</strong>s, Horae<br />

Synopticae: Contributions to <strong>the</strong> Study of <strong>the</strong> Synoptic Problem (Oxford: Clarendon, 1898,<br />

2 1909), and W. Sanday, ed., Studies <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Synoptic Problem (Oxford: Clarendon, 1911), carried<br />

on <strong>in</strong>dependently of <strong>the</strong> earlier German work (Holtzmann does not appear <strong>in</strong> any of <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

<strong>in</strong>dices, though Sanday was certa<strong>in</strong>ly familiar with Holtzmann's work).<br />

77. For convenience I refer to Holtzmann's revised and summary treatment <strong>in</strong> his<br />

Lehrbuch der historisch-kritischen E<strong>in</strong>leitung <strong>in</strong> das Neue Testament (Freiburg: Mohr-Siebeck,<br />

1886) 367-76.<br />

78. For <strong>the</strong> documentation of doublets see particularly Hawk<strong>in</strong>s, Horae Synopticae 80-<br />

107.<br />

79. Holtzmann expressed <strong>the</strong> po<strong>in</strong>t vigorously: 'What is more probable <strong>in</strong> itself: that Lc<br />

deliberately shattered (muthwillig zerschlagen) <strong>the</strong> great structures and scattered <strong>the</strong> wreckage<br />

to <strong>the</strong> four w<strong>in</strong>ds, or that out of his heaps of stones Mt has built those walls' (Lehrbuch 372).<br />

42

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!