Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1 Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

khazarzar.skeptik.net
from khazarzar.skeptik.net More from this publisher
09.02.2013 Views

THE MISSION OF JESUS §14.3 of irreplaceable value to them — their very lives. 87 Suffering was to be the lot of the messenger, as a sheep among wolves (Matt. 10.16/Luke 10.3). Worth noting, however, is Matthew's addition to the mission instructions: A disciple is not above his teacher, nor a servant above his master. It is enough for the disciple to be like his teacher and the servant like his master. If they have called the master of the house Beelzebul, how much more will they malign those of his household (Matt. 10.24-25). The saying undoubtedly reflects subsequent reflection on the lot of Jesus' disciples, but it is well enough grounded in Jesus' forebodings, elsewhere attested, 88 as to provide a fitting summary of this further aspect of discipleship. Disciples could not assume that the path of discipleship would be other than that trodden by Jesus himself. Learning, missioning, serving, praying, and suffering hardly provide a complete description of discipleship and could hardly be regarded as a blueprint for all (though Jesus presumably expected all to both learn and pray). But they were evidently characteristics of the discipleship to which Jesus called, not least as following in his own footsteps. The common feature in each case is that they are marks of disciples of Jesus. If we revert to the image of 'circles of discipleship' (§13.8), the point needs to be made that they were 'circles' because Jesus was the centre. ing which used crucifixion as illustration of the completeness of commitment called for is certainly possible to conceive (cf. GTh 55.2). Meier cites Epictetus 1.229-30 ('If you wish to be crucified, wait, and the cross will come') and Plato's Republic 1.124-25 {Marginal Jew 3.64- 67, 108 n. 86). 87. Meier, Marginal Jew 3.56-64, affirms Taylor's remark: 'Few sayings of Jesus are so well attested as this' {Mark 382). Mark has elaborated the tradition he received (by adding at least 'and [for the sake of] the gospel'), but Jesus was evidently remembered as voicing the memorable sequence (8.35-37), perhaps in reflection on Ps. 49.7-8 (Pesch, Markusevangelium 2.62-64). See also E. Schweizer, Erniedrigung und Erhöhung bei Jesus und seinen Nachfolgern (Zürich: Zwingli, 2 1962) 15-17 (ET of first edition, Lordship and Discipleship [London: SCM, 1960] 17-18), though he is dubious on the origin of 8.36-37; Crossan, Fragments 89-94. McKnight quotes Bonhoeffer with effect: 'When Christ calls a man, he bids him come and die' {New Vision 195; D. Bonhoeffer, The Cost of Discipleship [London: SCM, 1959] 99), though in private correspondence he points out that this is a dramatic over-translation of what Bonhoeffer actually wrote. 88. See below §17.4. 562

THE MISSION OF JESUS §14.3<br />

of irreplaceable value to <strong>the</strong>m — <strong>the</strong>ir very lives. 87 Suffer<strong>in</strong>g was to be <strong>the</strong> lot of<br />

<strong>the</strong> messenger, as a sheep among wolves (Matt. 10.16/Luke 10.3). Worth not<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

however, is Mat<strong>the</strong>w's addition to <strong>the</strong> mission <strong>in</strong>structions:<br />

A disciple is not above his teacher, nor a servant above his master. It is<br />

enough for <strong>the</strong> disciple to be like his teacher and <strong>the</strong> servant like his master.<br />

If <strong>the</strong>y have called <strong>the</strong> master of <strong>the</strong> house Beelzebul, how much more will<br />

<strong>the</strong>y malign those of his household (Matt. 10.24-25).<br />

The say<strong>in</strong>g undoubtedly reflects subsequent reflection on <strong>the</strong> lot of <strong>Jesus</strong>' disciples,<br />

but it is well enough grounded <strong>in</strong> <strong>Jesus</strong>' forebod<strong>in</strong>gs, elsewhere attested, 88<br />

as to provide a fitt<strong>in</strong>g summary of this fur<strong>the</strong>r aspect of discipleship. Disciples<br />

could not assume that <strong>the</strong> path of discipleship would be o<strong>the</strong>r than that trodden<br />

by <strong>Jesus</strong> himself.<br />

Learn<strong>in</strong>g, mission<strong>in</strong>g, serv<strong>in</strong>g, pray<strong>in</strong>g, and suffer<strong>in</strong>g hardly provide a<br />

complete description of discipleship and could hardly be regarded as a bluepr<strong>in</strong>t<br />

for all (though <strong>Jesus</strong> presumably expected all to both learn and pray). But <strong>the</strong>y<br />

were evidently characteristics of <strong>the</strong> discipleship to which <strong>Jesus</strong> called, not least<br />

as follow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> his own footsteps. The common feature <strong>in</strong> each case is that <strong>the</strong>y<br />

are marks of disciples of <strong>Jesus</strong>. If we revert to <strong>the</strong> image of 'circles of discipleship'<br />

(§13.8), <strong>the</strong> po<strong>in</strong>t needs to be made that <strong>the</strong>y were 'circles' because <strong>Jesus</strong><br />

was <strong>the</strong> centre.<br />

<strong>in</strong>g which used crucifixion as illustration of <strong>the</strong> completeness of commitment called for is certa<strong>in</strong>ly<br />

possible to conceive (cf. GTh 55.2). Meier cites Epictetus 1.229-30 ('If you wish to be<br />

crucified, wait, and <strong>the</strong> cross will come') and Plato's Republic 1.124-25 {Marg<strong>in</strong>al Jew 3.64-<br />

67, 108 n. 86).<br />

87. Meier, Marg<strong>in</strong>al Jew 3.56-64, affirms Taylor's remark: 'Few say<strong>in</strong>gs of <strong>Jesus</strong> are so<br />

well attested as this' {Mark 382). Mark has elaborated <strong>the</strong> tradition he received (by add<strong>in</strong>g at<br />

least 'and [for <strong>the</strong> sake of] <strong>the</strong> gospel'), but <strong>Jesus</strong> was evidently remembered as voic<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

memorable sequence (8.35-37), perhaps <strong>in</strong> reflection on Ps. 49.7-8 (Pesch, Markusevangelium<br />

2.62-64). See also E. Schweizer, Erniedrigung und Erhöhung bei <strong>Jesus</strong> und se<strong>in</strong>en Nachfolgern<br />

(Zürich: Zw<strong>in</strong>gli, 2 1962) 15-17 (ET of first edition, Lordship and Discipleship [London: SCM,<br />

1960] 17-18), though he is dubious on <strong>the</strong> orig<strong>in</strong> of 8.36-37; Crossan, Fragments 89-94.<br />

McKnight quotes Bonhoeffer with effect: 'When Christ calls a man, he bids him come and die'<br />

{New Vision 195; D. Bonhoeffer, The Cost of Discipleship [London: SCM, 1959] 99), though <strong>in</strong><br />

private correspondence he po<strong>in</strong>ts out that this is a dramatic over-translation of what Bonhoeffer<br />

actually wrote.<br />

88. See below §17.4.<br />

562

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!