Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1 Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

khazarzar.skeptik.net
from khazarzar.skeptik.net More from this publisher
09.02.2013 Views

THE MISSION OF JESUS §13.8 coming kingdom, remains unclear. As also whether we should recognize the distinction between 'disciples' and 'followers' as significant. Certainly Jesus seems to have been especially concerned to include those whom most others, or the main opinion-formers in particular, regarded and treated as outside the realm of covenant grace. Not just the poor, in line with the deeply rooted priorities of Torah and prophet, but also, surprisingly, 'sinners', who ought to be disapproved of by the faithful, until we remember that the 'righteous' were so stringent in their reading of the law that many practitioners of 'common Judaism' were in effect excluded in the perspective of the righteous. In all this the vision of a renewed Israel was little different from that of Jesus' prophetic predecessors. But Jesus did look for its fulfilment in the near future, and he did seek to anticipate it in the circle of discipleship which he drew around him. The ambiguity suggests that we should speak of circles (plural) of discipleship, rather than of a single coherent circle. 249 The innermost circle seems to have been the twelve, with Peter and the brothers James and John at its heart, 250 and Peter as the chief spokesman. 251 But round the twelve we have seen a wider circle of followers, including women who followed (Mary of Magdala and others) and women who stayed at home (Mary of Bethany); the two Marys were evidently among Jesus' dearest companions. Should we characterize a further circle in terms of those who followed Jesus secretly, such as the owner of the upper room and Joseph of Arimathea? But then we have to mention also those who heard Jesus gladly (Mark 3.35) and sought to live out his teaching (Matt. 7.24- 25), those whom he healed (Mark 10.52), those who turned and became as children (Matt. 18.3), the poor who trusted (Luke 6.20), the sinners who repented (Luke 18.13-14; 19.1-10), the Gentiles who displayed a faith which Jesus hardly met elsewhere (Matt. 8.10), and indeed, according to Luke, sympathetic Pharisees (Luke 7.36; 11.37; 14.1). What is striking about these circles of discipleship is the way they overlap and intertwine, forbidding us to make any hard and fast distinction between disciples and followers, or to designate different grades of 249. Cf. Ladd, Jesus and the Kingdom 248-54; Lohfink, Jesus and Community 31-35; Sanders, Historical Figure 123-27; Meier, Marginal Jew 3.627-30. 250. It makes better sense of the evidence to deduce that the prominence of the three in the earliest days of the new movement (Acts 1.13; 3-4; 12.2) is a reflection of an earlier pre- Easter prominence (Mark 1.29; 3.16-17; 5.37; 9.2; 13.3; 14.33) rather than the reverse. James the brother of John hardly features in the post-Easter story, and his early execution (Acts 12.2) leaves it unlikely that he made a deep enough impression in the traditioning process for that impression to be extended back into the tradition itself. Somewhat surprisingly, Meier concludes that 'the group of three may be a creation of Mark's redactional activity' (Marginal Jew 3.211- 12). 251. Mark 8.29, 32 pars.; 9.5 pars.; 10.28 pars.; 11.21; 14.29 pars.; Matt. 15.15; 17.24- 27; 18.21; Luke 8.45; 12.41; John 6.68; 13.6-9, 36-37; 21.3. 540

THE MISSION OF JESUS §13.8<br />

com<strong>in</strong>g k<strong>in</strong>gdom, rema<strong>in</strong>s unclear. As also whe<strong>the</strong>r we should recognize <strong>the</strong> dist<strong>in</strong>ction<br />

between 'disciples' and 'followers' as significant. Certa<strong>in</strong>ly <strong>Jesus</strong> seems<br />

to have been especially concerned to <strong>in</strong>clude those whom most o<strong>the</strong>rs, or <strong>the</strong><br />

ma<strong>in</strong> op<strong>in</strong>ion-formers <strong>in</strong> particular, regarded and treated as outside <strong>the</strong> realm of<br />

covenant grace. Not just <strong>the</strong> poor, <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e with <strong>the</strong> deeply rooted priorities of Torah<br />

and prophet, but also, surpris<strong>in</strong>gly, 's<strong>in</strong>ners', who ought to be disapproved of<br />

by <strong>the</strong> faithful, until we remember that <strong>the</strong> 'righteous' were so str<strong>in</strong>gent <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

read<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> law that many practitioners of 'common Judaism' were <strong>in</strong> effect<br />

excluded <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> perspective of <strong>the</strong> righteous. In all this <strong>the</strong> vision of a renewed Israel<br />

was little different from that of <strong>Jesus</strong>' prophetic predecessors. But <strong>Jesus</strong> did<br />

look for its fulfilment <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> near future, and he did seek to anticipate it <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> circle<br />

of discipleship which he drew around him.<br />

The ambiguity suggests that we should speak of circles (plural) of discipleship,<br />

ra<strong>the</strong>r than of a s<strong>in</strong>gle coherent circle. 249 The <strong>in</strong>nermost circle seems to<br />

have been <strong>the</strong> twelve, with Peter and <strong>the</strong> bro<strong>the</strong>rs James and John at its heart, 250<br />

and Peter as <strong>the</strong> chief spokesman. 251 But round <strong>the</strong> twelve we have seen a wider<br />

circle of followers, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g women who followed (Mary of Magdala and o<strong>the</strong>rs)<br />

and women who stayed at home (Mary of Bethany); <strong>the</strong> two Marys were evidently<br />

among <strong>Jesus</strong>' dearest companions. Should we characterize a fur<strong>the</strong>r circle<br />

<strong>in</strong> terms of those who followed <strong>Jesus</strong> secretly, such as <strong>the</strong> owner of <strong>the</strong> upper<br />

room and Joseph of Arima<strong>the</strong>a? But <strong>the</strong>n we have to mention also those who<br />

heard <strong>Jesus</strong> gladly (Mark 3.35) and sought to live out his teach<strong>in</strong>g (Matt. 7.24-<br />

25), those whom he healed (Mark 10.52), those who turned and became as children<br />

(Matt. 18.3), <strong>the</strong> poor who trusted (Luke 6.20), <strong>the</strong> s<strong>in</strong>ners who repented<br />

(Luke 18.13-14; 19.1-10), <strong>the</strong> Gentiles who displayed a faith which <strong>Jesus</strong> hardly<br />

met elsewhere (Matt. 8.10), and <strong>in</strong>deed, accord<strong>in</strong>g to Luke, sympa<strong>the</strong>tic Pharisees<br />

(Luke 7.36; 11.37; 14.1). What is strik<strong>in</strong>g about <strong>the</strong>se circles of discipleship<br />

is <strong>the</strong> way <strong>the</strong>y overlap and <strong>in</strong>tertw<strong>in</strong>e, forbidd<strong>in</strong>g us to make any hard and fast<br />

dist<strong>in</strong>ction between disciples and followers, or to designate different grades of<br />

249. Cf. Ladd, <strong>Jesus</strong> and <strong>the</strong> K<strong>in</strong>gdom 248-54; Lohf<strong>in</strong>k, <strong>Jesus</strong> and Community 31-35;<br />

Sanders, Historical Figure 123-27; Meier, Marg<strong>in</strong>al Jew 3.627-30.<br />

250. It makes better sense of <strong>the</strong> evidence to deduce that <strong>the</strong> prom<strong>in</strong>ence of <strong>the</strong> three <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> earliest days of <strong>the</strong> new movement (Acts 1.13; 3-4; 12.2) is a reflection of an earlier pre-<br />

Easter prom<strong>in</strong>ence (Mark 1.29; 3.16-17; 5.37; 9.2; 13.3; 14.33) ra<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>the</strong> reverse. James<br />

<strong>the</strong> bro<strong>the</strong>r of John hardly features <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> post-Easter story, and his early execution (Acts 12.2)<br />

leaves it unlikely that he made a deep enough impression <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> tradition<strong>in</strong>g process for that impression<br />

to be extended back <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> tradition itself. Somewhat surpris<strong>in</strong>gly, Meier concludes<br />

that '<strong>the</strong> group of three may be a creation of Mark's redactional activity' (Marg<strong>in</strong>al Jew 3.211-<br />

12).<br />

251. Mark 8.29, 32 pars.; 9.5 pars.; 10.28 pars.; 11.21; 14.29 pars.; Matt. 15.15; 17.24-<br />

27; 18.21; Luke 8.45; 12.41; John 6.68; 13.6-9, 36-37; 21.3.<br />

540

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!