09.02.2013 Views

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

§13.5 For Whom Did <strong>Jesus</strong> Intend His Message?<br />

cord teach<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>Jesus</strong> which speaks favourably of toll-collectors. 210 One of his<br />

close disciples was a telönes (Mat<strong>the</strong>w/Levi). 211 As is now generally agreed, <strong>in</strong><br />

Palest<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong> term denoted collectors of <strong>in</strong>direct taxes, especially those levied on<br />

<strong>the</strong> transport of goods. 212 The title could be used both of supervisory officials<br />

like Zacchaeus and <strong>the</strong>ir employees who collected <strong>the</strong> taxes at toll booths or tax<br />

offices (telönion), such as Mat<strong>the</strong>w/Levi (Mark 2.14 pars.). 213<br />

Presumably toll-collectors are associated with 's<strong>in</strong>ners' <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Jesus</strong> tradition<br />

because <strong>the</strong>y were regarded as typical 's<strong>in</strong>ners'. This partly reflects <strong>the</strong> general<br />

disapprobation of <strong>the</strong> tax-farmer <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> ancient world. 214 Partly also <strong>the</strong> fact<br />

that such revenues would have been used to f<strong>in</strong>ance Herod Antipas's architectural<br />

ambitions or to reward his favourites or to contribute to <strong>the</strong> tribute owed to<br />

Rome (cf. Mark 12.14 pars.). A more important cause would be <strong>the</strong> widespread<br />

perception that tax-farmers used <strong>the</strong> opportunity to enrich <strong>the</strong>mselves dishonestly<br />

at <strong>the</strong> cost of <strong>the</strong> tax-payers. Luke, alert to such aspects, <strong>in</strong>dicates clearly<br />

both <strong>the</strong> suspicions (Luke 3.12-13; 18.11) and <strong>the</strong> reality (19.8). The more dist<strong>in</strong>ctively<br />

Jewish dismissal of unacceptable practice is reflected <strong>in</strong> two ra<strong>the</strong>r astonish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

say<strong>in</strong>gs recorded by Mat<strong>the</strong>w: toll-collectors <strong>in</strong> effect put <strong>the</strong>mselves<br />

alongside Gentiles, that is, outside <strong>the</strong> covenant people (Matt. 5.46-47; 18.17). 215<br />

Whatever <strong>the</strong> fuller facts of <strong>the</strong> matter, <strong>the</strong> situation recalled <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Jesus</strong><br />

tradition is clear enough. <strong>Jesus</strong> <strong>in</strong> his deal<strong>in</strong>gs with toll-collectors laid himself<br />

open to <strong>the</strong> jibe 'a friend of toll-collectors and s<strong>in</strong>ners' (Matt. 11.19/Luke<br />

7.34). 216 Even <strong>the</strong>y should not be regarded as 'beyond <strong>the</strong> pale': however unacceptable<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir means of livelihood might have been, <strong>the</strong>y <strong>the</strong>mselves were as<br />

210. Matt. 21.31-32; Luke 18.10-14.<br />

211. Mark 2.14 pars.; Matt. 10.3.<br />

212. Hence some of Capernaum's importance (see above, §9.9d).<br />

213. See especially J. R. Donahue, 'Tax Collectors and S<strong>in</strong>ners: An Attempt at Identification',<br />

CBQ 33 (1971) 39-61; also 'Tax Collector', ABD 6.337-38; Schottroff and Stegemann,<br />

Hope of <strong>the</strong> Poor 7-9; F. Herrenbruck, 'Wer waren die "Zöllner"?', ZNW 72 (1981) 178-94;<br />

also <strong>Jesus</strong> und die Zöllner (WUNT 2.41; Tüb<strong>in</strong>gen: Mohr Siebeck, 1990) 22-37.<br />

214. O. Michel, 'telönes', TDiVT 8.99-101; Schottroff and Stegemann, Hope of <strong>the</strong> Poor<br />

10-13; Herrenbruck, <strong>Jesus</strong> und die Zöllner 89-94.<br />

215. Luke 6.32-33 reads 's<strong>in</strong>ners' both times where Matt. 5.46-47 has 'toll-collectors'<br />

and 'Gentiles'. Matt. 18.17 ('let [<strong>the</strong> recalcitrant errant bro<strong>the</strong>r] be to you as a Gentile and a<br />

toll-collector') is without parallel. Possibly <strong>the</strong> earlier form of <strong>the</strong> first say<strong>in</strong>g reflected <strong>the</strong><br />

widespread dismissive attitude towards 's<strong>in</strong>ners' at <strong>the</strong> time of <strong>Jesus</strong>, while <strong>the</strong> performance<br />

tradition of Mat<strong>the</strong>w's communities cont<strong>in</strong>ued to express a Jewish attitude dismissive of<br />

Gentiles.<br />

216. Horsley's attempt to rebut <strong>the</strong> evidence on this po<strong>in</strong>t is disappo<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>gly tendentious<br />

(<strong>Jesus</strong> 212-23). Becker po<strong>in</strong>ts out that relations with tax-collectors were nei<strong>the</strong>r of <strong>in</strong>terest nor<br />

a problem for <strong>the</strong> post-Easter church (<strong>Jesus</strong> 163), so <strong>the</strong>re are no grounds for postulat<strong>in</strong>g a later<br />

orig<strong>in</strong> for <strong>the</strong> tradition.<br />

533

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!