09.02.2013 Views

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

§13.5 For Whom Did <strong>Jesus</strong> Intend His Message?<br />

A strik<strong>in</strong>g fact emerges from all this: that <strong>the</strong> language used <strong>in</strong> criticism of<br />

<strong>Jesus</strong> strongly reflects <strong>the</strong> polemical and factional use of <strong>the</strong> term elsewhere attested<br />

among <strong>Jesus</strong>' contemporaries. Most notable is <strong>the</strong> anti<strong>the</strong>sis between 'righteous'<br />

and 's<strong>in</strong>ners' (Mark 2.17 pars.), reflected also <strong>in</strong> Luke's conclusion to <strong>the</strong><br />

parable of <strong>the</strong> lost sheep (Luke 15.7) and <strong>in</strong> his parable of <strong>the</strong> Pharisee and <strong>the</strong> tollcollector<br />

(18.9, 14). 200 The conclusion lies close to hand that <strong>Jesus</strong> was criticised<br />

by some who regarded <strong>the</strong>mselves as properly law-observant ('righteous') and that<br />

he was criticised for associat<strong>in</strong>g with those whom '<strong>the</strong> righteous'deemed to be 's<strong>in</strong>ners',<br />

that is, those who disregarded or disputed <strong>in</strong>terpretations of <strong>the</strong> Torah held<br />

dear by '<strong>the</strong> righteous' (sadikkim). In o<strong>the</strong>r words, <strong>the</strong> sentiment of Mark 2.17c fits<br />

remarkably closely <strong>in</strong>to a context typified by <strong>the</strong> Enochic corpus, <strong>the</strong> Dead Sea<br />

Scrolls, and <strong>the</strong> Psalms of Solomon. As we noted earlier (§9.4), <strong>the</strong> same literature<br />

also <strong>in</strong>dicates <strong>the</strong> likelihood that Pharisees were heavily <strong>in</strong><strong>vol</strong>ved <strong>in</strong> such factional<br />

disputes. It must be judged very likely, <strong>the</strong>n, that <strong>the</strong> critics of <strong>Jesus</strong> were <strong>in</strong>deed<br />

typically Pharisees (whose standpo<strong>in</strong>t <strong>the</strong> Psalms of Solomon probably reflects<br />

most closely), and that it was <strong>in</strong>deed <strong>the</strong>y who used <strong>the</strong> term 's<strong>in</strong>ners' <strong>in</strong> criticis<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>Jesus</strong>' association with those deemed law-breakers by such Pharisees. 201<br />

In which case we should also note that <strong>in</strong> Mark 2.17 <strong>Jesus</strong> is not remembered<br />

as disput<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> righteousness of <strong>the</strong> Pharisaic critics. As <strong>the</strong> say<strong>in</strong>g stands,<br />

'<strong>the</strong> righteous' <strong>in</strong> 2.17c correspond to 'those who are <strong>in</strong> good health' <strong>in</strong> 2.17b. 202<br />

Even if at this po<strong>in</strong>t 'righteous' is as much a factional term as 's<strong>in</strong>ner', it is not<br />

<strong>the</strong> self-assertion of righteousness which <strong>Jesus</strong> here questions, 203 only <strong>the</strong> use of<br />

<strong>the</strong> pejorative 's<strong>in</strong>ner'. Nor does <strong>Jesus</strong> deny that <strong>the</strong> epi<strong>the</strong>t is often justified:<br />

's<strong>in</strong>ners' are equivalent to '<strong>the</strong> sick'; he himself called for repentance (§13.2a);<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> parable of <strong>the</strong> Pharisee and <strong>the</strong> toll-collector, <strong>the</strong> latter confesses that he is<br />

200. Note also <strong>the</strong> use of dikaioö <strong>in</strong> Matt. 11.19/Luke 7.35; Luke 16.15; and cf. Matt.<br />

21.32.<br />

201. Even when hamartölos is used <strong>in</strong> a non-factional context (Luke 5.8; 6.32-34; 7.37,<br />

39; 13.2; 15.7, 10; 18.13) a dismissive (even self-dismissive) overtone is clear. 'S<strong>in</strong>ner' could<br />

sometimes be used to describe a prostitute, as implied <strong>in</strong> Matt. 21.31 (where 'prostitutes' replaces<br />

<strong>the</strong> more common 's<strong>in</strong>ners' <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> association with toll-collectors) and Luke 7.37, 39. On<br />

<strong>Jesus</strong>' attitude to law-break<strong>in</strong>g see below, §14.4.<br />

202. Cf. <strong>the</strong> affirmation given to <strong>the</strong> n<strong>in</strong>ety-n<strong>in</strong>e who do not need to repent <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> parable<br />

of <strong>the</strong> lost sheep (Luke 15.7) and to <strong>the</strong> elder bro<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> parable of <strong>the</strong> prodigal son (Luke<br />

15.31). Elsewhere <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Jesus</strong> tradition <strong>the</strong> term 'righteous' (dikaios) is used positively, and not<br />

only by Mat<strong>the</strong>w (Mark 6.20; Matt. 1.19; 10.41; 13.17, 43, 49; 23.29, 35; 25.46; Luke 1.6, 17;<br />

2.25; 14.14; 23.47, 50), though it is noteworthy that not one of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>stances is paralleled <strong>in</strong> a<br />

second Gospel. Given this feature of <strong>the</strong> data, McKnight is unwise to put as much weight on it<br />

as he does (New Vision 200-206).<br />

203. We may ask whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>Jesus</strong> criticizes <strong>the</strong> assertion of self-righteousness even <strong>in</strong><br />

Luke 18.11-12, s<strong>in</strong>ce a parallel like 1QH 15[= 7].26-35 suggests an attitude of gratitude more<br />

than of pride (Borg, Conflict 107-108).<br />

531

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!