09.02.2013 Views

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE MISSION OF JESUS §13.3<br />

his disciples: 'Do not be afraid, little flock; because your Fa<strong>the</strong>r is pleased to give<br />

you <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>gdom' 111 — where aga<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> allusion is evidently to Israel as <strong>the</strong><br />

flock protected by its div<strong>in</strong>e shepherd. 112 Elsewhere <strong>the</strong> image of Israel like scattered<br />

sheep lack<strong>in</strong>g direction, as <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> wilderness (Num. 27.17) or under fail<strong>in</strong>g<br />

leadership, 113 is evoked by <strong>the</strong> depiction/(memory?) of people straggl<strong>in</strong>g round<br />

<strong>the</strong> shore of <strong>the</strong> lake to hear more from <strong>Jesus</strong> (Mark 6.34). Mat<strong>the</strong>w has moved<br />

<strong>the</strong> allusion to <strong>in</strong>troduce his version of <strong>the</strong> commission of <strong>the</strong> twelve (Matt.<br />

9.36). Both are <strong>the</strong> work of <strong>the</strong> narrator, but <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>Jesus</strong>' mission evoked<br />

such imagery can count as a streng<strong>the</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> likelihood that <strong>the</strong> imagery was<br />

prompted by what <strong>Jesus</strong> himself said and did.<br />

In short, <strong>the</strong> imagery of Israel as Yahweh's flock had an irregular role with<strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>Jesus</strong> tradition, but it is more likely that <strong>the</strong> extent to which <strong>the</strong> imagery is<br />

played upon was prompted by memory of <strong>Jesus</strong>' own usage than o<strong>the</strong>rwise.<br />

d. Inherit<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Land<br />

In §12.4c we observed that Mat<strong>the</strong>w's third beatitude ('Blessed are <strong>the</strong> meek, for<br />

<strong>the</strong>y shall <strong>in</strong>herit <strong>the</strong> land/earth') clearly alludes to Ps. 37.11 ('The meek shall<br />

possess <strong>the</strong> land'). More to <strong>the</strong> po<strong>in</strong>t here, <strong>the</strong> allusion is clearly a play on <strong>the</strong> ancient<br />

covenant promise that Abraham's descendants would <strong>in</strong>herit <strong>the</strong> land. 114<br />

Although Mat<strong>the</strong>w probably took <strong>the</strong> beatitude's promise <strong>in</strong> a spiritual sense<br />

(§13.4b), we should at least be aware of <strong>the</strong> underly<strong>in</strong>g strand of thought: <strong>in</strong><br />

some sense '<strong>the</strong> meek' would enjoy <strong>the</strong> fulfilment of <strong>the</strong> ancient covenant promise<br />

to Israel's patriarchs.<br />

e. A New Covenant<br />

As we saw above, it is likely that <strong>the</strong> last supper tradition recollects <strong>Jesus</strong>' f<strong>in</strong>al<br />

meal toge<strong>the</strong>r with his disciples (§8.5c). Here we need simply observe that <strong>Jesus</strong><br />

is recalled as describ<strong>in</strong>g it as a covenant meal, <strong>in</strong>deed, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> version common to<br />

Luke and Paul, as '<strong>the</strong> new covenant <strong>in</strong> my (<strong>Jesus</strong>') blood' (Luke 22.20/1 Cor.<br />

ow<strong>in</strong>g of his own fate. A similar understand<strong>in</strong>g of Zech. 13.7 is reflected <strong>in</strong> CD 19.6-10 (see<br />

below, § 17.5c).<br />

111. Its isolated attestation puts Luke 12.32's status as a word of <strong>Jesus</strong> <strong>in</strong> question for<br />

most, though we can at least say that it is consistent with <strong>the</strong> rest of <strong>the</strong> motif (see also Beasley-<br />

Murray, <strong>Jesus</strong> and <strong>the</strong> K<strong>in</strong>gdom 185-87; Hampel, Menschensohn 39-40).<br />

112. Is <strong>the</strong>re also an allusion to Dan. 7.27 (Jeremias, Proclamation 181)?<br />

113. 1 Kgs. 22.17; 2 Chron. 18.16; Jer. 50.6; Ezek. 34.5-6; Zech. 10.2; Jdt. 11.19.<br />

114. Gen. 12.7; 13.15; 15.18; 17.8; 24.7; 26.3; 28.4, 13; 35.12; 48.4.<br />

512

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!