09.02.2013 Views

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE MISSION OF JESUS<br />

(2) There are several lists of '<strong>the</strong> twelve':<br />

Matt. 10.2-4<br />

Simon Peter<br />

Andrew his bro<strong>the</strong>r<br />

James (son of<br />

Zebedee)<br />

John bro<strong>the</strong>r of<br />

James<br />

Philip<br />

Bartholomew<br />

Thomas<br />

Mat<strong>the</strong>w<br />

James (son of<br />

Alphaeus)<br />

Thaddeus<br />

Simon <strong>the</strong> Cananean<br />

Judas Iscariot<br />

Mark 3.16-19<br />

Simon Peter<br />

James (son of<br />

Zebedee)<br />

John bro<strong>the</strong>r of<br />

James<br />

Andrew<br />

Philip<br />

Bartholomew<br />

Mat<strong>the</strong>w<br />

Thomas<br />

James (son of<br />

Alphaeus)<br />

Thaddeus<br />

Simon <strong>the</strong> Cananean<br />

Judas Iscariot<br />

Luke 6.14-16<br />

Simon Peter<br />

Andrew his<br />

bro<strong>the</strong>r<br />

James<br />

John<br />

Philip<br />

Bartholomew<br />

Mat<strong>the</strong>w<br />

Thomas<br />

James (of<br />

Alphaeus)<br />

Simon <strong>the</strong> Zealot<br />

Jude (of) James<br />

Judas Iscariot<br />

Peter<br />

John<br />

James<br />

Andrew<br />

Acts 1.13<br />

Philip<br />

Thomas<br />

Bartholomew<br />

Mat<strong>the</strong>w<br />

§13.3<br />

James (of<br />

Alphaeus)<br />

Simon <strong>the</strong> Zealot<br />

Jude (of) James<br />

Aga<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> variations are what we might expect <strong>in</strong> oral transmission: Simon Peter<br />

is as firmly rooted at <strong>the</strong> top as Judas Iscariot is at <strong>the</strong> end, though Philip and<br />

James (son of Alphaeus) also hold regular places at <strong>the</strong> head of <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r two<br />

groups of four; o<strong>the</strong>rwise <strong>the</strong> order varies (even between <strong>the</strong> two Lukan lists) for<br />

no obvious reason (beyond keep<strong>in</strong>g Andrew with his bro<strong>the</strong>r). Most <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g is<br />

<strong>the</strong> discrepancy among <strong>the</strong> third groups of four: Thaddeus (Mat<strong>the</strong>w/Mark) or<br />

Jude (of) James (Luke), 89 not to mention a certa<strong>in</strong> degree of confusion as to who<br />

is '<strong>the</strong> son of Alphaeus' . 90 This suggests that <strong>the</strong> degree of fixity <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> oral transmission<br />

varied among <strong>the</strong> three groups of four, imply<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>the</strong> membership of<br />

<strong>the</strong> third group was deemed less important than that of <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r two and so was<br />

ever, do observe numerical propriety (Matt. 28.16; Luke 24.9, 33; Acts 1.26). How little of any<br />

of this can be attributed to Paul<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>fluence is <strong>in</strong>dicated by <strong>the</strong> total absence of any attempt to<br />

resolve or ease <strong>the</strong> dilemma that '<strong>the</strong> apostle Paul' (a designation on which Paul himself was<br />

most <strong>in</strong>sistent) was not one of <strong>the</strong> twelve apostles.<br />

89. As is well known, John 14.22 attests a second Jude/(Judas). Pesch wonders whe<strong>the</strong>r<br />

Jude was <strong>in</strong>troduced to <strong>the</strong> list <strong>in</strong> order to secure apostolic authority for <strong>the</strong> author of <strong>the</strong> letter<br />

of Jude (Markusevangelium 1.208). Meier ('Circle of Twelve' 648; Marg<strong>in</strong>al Jew 3.131) and<br />

Casey (Aramaic Sources 196) air <strong>the</strong> possibility that one early member of <strong>the</strong> twelve left <strong>the</strong><br />

group dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Jesus</strong>' m<strong>in</strong>istry and was replaced by ano<strong>the</strong>r, though <strong>the</strong>re is no h<strong>in</strong>t of a replacement<br />

prior to Acts 1.21.<br />

90. Levi (Mark 2.14; Gos. Pet. 14.60) = Mat<strong>the</strong>w (Matt. 9.9) or James (Mark 3.18 pars.;<br />

Acts 1.13)?<br />

508

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!