Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1 Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

khazarzar.skeptik.net
from khazarzar.skeptik.net More from this publisher
09.02.2013 Views

THE MISSION OF JESUS §13.2 'faith in God' , 59 This strongly suggests that stories and teaching about the faith encouraged and commended by Jesus had already assumed a definitive shape before Easter. Equally striking is the complete absence of any reference to Jesus' own faith, or to Jesus as 'believing'. 60 Jesus is not the one who believes/trusts in God so much as the medium of God's healing power to those who trust in God. 61 In short, Jesus is presented neither as the example of one who believed, nor as the one in whom subsequent hearers should believe. Behind the Greekpisteuö no doubt lies the hiphil of Hebrew 'mn (he'emin, 'to trust, believe in, rely on, be confident in'), used of trust in God in passages scattered across the Hebrew Scriptures. 62 The noun equivalent to the Greek pistis, Hebrew 'emunä or 'emet, had more the sense of 'firmness, reliability, faithfulness', 63 but it could embrace the sense of the hiphil verb, as seems to be implied by the usage attributed to Jesus. So if Jesus did indeed use the Aramaic equivalent of the noun (hemanuta), in echo of the verb encouraging individuals to trust in God, it should be noted that the concept would be of 'firm faith', faith which is steady and committed in its reliance on God. 64 It was the firmness of the ian literature); Matthew has made it one of his own motifs (Matt. 6.30; 8.26; 14.31; 16.8; 17.20). Since oligopistos 'lacks any real equivalent in the Semitic languages' Fitzmyer concludes that it can hardly be traced back to Jesus himself (Luke 979); but even if a direct translation equivalent is lacking, the thought itself could certainly be expressed by Jesus (cf. Str-B 1.438-39; Davies and Allison, Matthew 1.656). 59. Cf. Bornkamm, Jesus 129-37. Stegemann presses the point: 'Jesus appears simply as a mediator of heavenly, divine power' {Library 236). 60. Roloff, Kerygma 166-8, 172-3. Despite Fuchs (see above, chapter 5 n. 61) and the renewed emphasis on this point in Pauline studies consequent upon Richard Hays, The Faith of Jesus Christ: An Investigation of the Narrative Substructure of Galatians iii.l—iv.ll (Chico: Scholars, 1983); further bibliography in my Theology of Paul 335. The one exception might be Mark 9.23: it is because Jesus has faith that 'all things are possible' to him; but the primary function of the reference is to encourage the father of the boy to believe (9.24) (brief discussion in Meier, Marginal Jew 2.655 with bibliography in notes). 61. In Matt. 9.28 Jesus encourages the two blind men to believe that he is able to help them; cf. Mark 11.31 pars, and Matt. 21.32, where the talk is of believing the Baptist. See further below, §15.7g(3). 62. Gen. 15.6; Exod. 14.31; Num. 14.11; 20.12; Deut. 1.32; 2 Kgs. 17.14; 2 Chron. 20.20; Ps. 78.22; Jonah 3.5 (BDB 'aman hiphil 2c); plus Isa. 7.9; 28.16; 43.10 (A. Jepsen, 'aman, TDOT 1.305-307); more consistently in the Apocrypha — Jdt. 14.10; Sir. 2.6, 8, 10; 11.21; Wis. 1.2; 12.2; 16.26; 18.6; 1 Mace. 2.59. 63. BDB 'emunah, 'emeth; Jepsen, TDOT 1.310-13, 316-19. 64. The condemnation of a 'faithless (apistos) generation' (Mark 9.19) may echo Deut. 32.20 ('a perverse generation, sons in whom there is no faithfulness [lo'-'emunY. Matt. 17.17/ Luke 9.41 ('a faithless and perverse generation') is usually reckoned a minor agreement against Mark, influenced more explicitly by Deuteronomy 32. Stuhlmacher, however, argues that Jesus presented 'a wholly novel view of faith' as a gift of God and as such faith in God (Biblische Theologie 1.91-92). 502

THE MISSION OF JESUS §13.2<br />

'faith <strong>in</strong> God' , 59 This strongly suggests that stories and teach<strong>in</strong>g about <strong>the</strong> faith<br />

encouraged and commended by <strong>Jesus</strong> had already assumed a def<strong>in</strong>itive shape before<br />

Easter. Equally strik<strong>in</strong>g is <strong>the</strong> complete absence of any reference to <strong>Jesus</strong>'<br />

own faith, or to <strong>Jesus</strong> as 'believ<strong>in</strong>g'. 60 <strong>Jesus</strong> is not <strong>the</strong> one who believes/trusts <strong>in</strong><br />

God so much as <strong>the</strong> medium of God's heal<strong>in</strong>g power to those who trust <strong>in</strong> God. 61<br />

In short, <strong>Jesus</strong> is presented nei<strong>the</strong>r as <strong>the</strong> example of one who believed, nor as <strong>the</strong><br />

one <strong>in</strong> whom subsequent hearers should believe.<br />

Beh<strong>in</strong>d <strong>the</strong> Greekpisteuö no doubt lies <strong>the</strong> hiphil of Hebrew 'mn (he'em<strong>in</strong>,<br />

'to trust, believe <strong>in</strong>, rely on, be confident <strong>in</strong>'), used of trust <strong>in</strong> God <strong>in</strong> passages<br />

scattered across <strong>the</strong> Hebrew Scriptures. 62 The noun equivalent to <strong>the</strong> Greek<br />

pistis, Hebrew 'emunä or 'emet, had more <strong>the</strong> sense of 'firmness, reliability,<br />

faithfulness', 63 but it could embrace <strong>the</strong> sense of <strong>the</strong> hiphil verb, as seems to be<br />

implied by <strong>the</strong> usage attributed to <strong>Jesus</strong>. So if <strong>Jesus</strong> did <strong>in</strong>deed use <strong>the</strong> Aramaic<br />

equivalent of <strong>the</strong> noun (hemanuta), <strong>in</strong> echo of <strong>the</strong> verb encourag<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dividuals<br />

to trust <strong>in</strong> God, it should be noted that <strong>the</strong> concept would be of 'firm faith', faith<br />

which is steady and committed <strong>in</strong> its reliance on God. 64 It was <strong>the</strong> firmness of <strong>the</strong><br />

ian literature); Mat<strong>the</strong>w has made it one of his own motifs (Matt. 6.30; 8.26; 14.31; 16.8;<br />

17.20). S<strong>in</strong>ce oligopistos 'lacks any real equivalent <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Semitic languages' Fitzmyer concludes<br />

that it can hardly be traced back to <strong>Jesus</strong> himself (Luke 979); but even if a direct translation<br />

equivalent is lack<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>the</strong> thought itself could certa<strong>in</strong>ly be expressed by <strong>Jesus</strong> (cf. Str-B<br />

1.438-39; Davies and Allison, Mat<strong>the</strong>w 1.656).<br />

59. Cf. Bornkamm, <strong>Jesus</strong> 129-37. Stegemann presses <strong>the</strong> po<strong>in</strong>t: '<strong>Jesus</strong> appears simply as<br />

a mediator of heavenly, div<strong>in</strong>e power' {Library 236).<br />

60. Roloff, Kerygma 166-8, 172-3. Despite Fuchs (see above, chapter 5 n. 61) and <strong>the</strong><br />

renewed emphasis on this po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong> Paul<strong>in</strong>e studies consequent upon Richard Hays, The Faith of<br />

<strong>Jesus</strong> Christ: An Investigation of <strong>the</strong> Narrative Substructure of Galatians iii.l—iv.ll (Chico:<br />

Scholars, 1983); fur<strong>the</strong>r bibliography <strong>in</strong> my Theology of Paul 335. The one exception might be<br />

Mark 9.23: it is because <strong>Jesus</strong> has faith that 'all th<strong>in</strong>gs are possible' to him; but <strong>the</strong> primary<br />

function of <strong>the</strong> reference is to encourage <strong>the</strong> fa<strong>the</strong>r of <strong>the</strong> boy to believe (9.24) (brief discussion<br />

<strong>in</strong> Meier, Marg<strong>in</strong>al Jew 2.655 with bibliography <strong>in</strong> notes).<br />

61. In Matt. 9.28 <strong>Jesus</strong> encourages <strong>the</strong> two bl<strong>in</strong>d men to believe that he is able to help<br />

<strong>the</strong>m; cf. Mark 11.31 pars, and Matt. 21.32, where <strong>the</strong> talk is of believ<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Baptist. See fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />

below, §15.7g(3).<br />

62. Gen. 15.6; Exod. 14.31; Num. 14.11; 20.12; Deut. 1.32; 2 Kgs. 17.14; 2 Chron.<br />

20.20; Ps. 78.22; Jonah 3.5 (BDB 'aman hiphil 2c); plus Isa. 7.9; 28.16; 43.10 (A. Jepsen,<br />

'aman, TDOT 1.305-307); more consistently <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Apocrypha — Jdt. 14.10; Sir. 2.6, 8, 10;<br />

11.21; Wis. 1.2; 12.2; 16.26; 18.6; 1 Mace. 2.59.<br />

63. BDB 'emunah, 'emeth; Jepsen, TDOT 1.310-13, 316-19.<br />

64. The condemnation of a 'faithless (apistos) generation' (Mark 9.19) may echo Deut.<br />

32.20 ('a perverse generation, sons <strong>in</strong> whom <strong>the</strong>re is no faithfulness [lo'-'emunY. Matt. 17.17/<br />

Luke 9.41 ('a faithless and perverse generation') is usually reckoned a m<strong>in</strong>or agreement aga<strong>in</strong>st<br />

Mark, <strong>in</strong>fluenced more explicitly by Deuteronomy 32. Stuhlmacher, however, argues that <strong>Jesus</strong><br />

presented 'a wholly novel view of faith' as a gift of God and as such faith <strong>in</strong> God (Biblische<br />

Theologie 1.91-92).<br />

502

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!