09.02.2013 Views

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE MISSION OF JESUS §13.2<br />

appropriately by render<strong>in</strong>g metanoeö as a call to 'convert', that is, for <strong>in</strong>dividuals<br />

to radically alter <strong>the</strong> manner and direction of <strong>the</strong>ir whole life, <strong>in</strong> its basic motivations,<br />

attitudes and objectives, for a society to radically reform its communal<br />

goals and values. 46 The prodigal son who literally turned round, abandoned his<br />

life-style and returned to his fa<strong>the</strong>r (Luke 15.18-20a) is as good an illustration as<br />

one could want. Similarly <strong>the</strong> parable of <strong>the</strong> toll-collector illustrates that such a<br />

turn-round/repentance has to be unconditional (<strong>in</strong> contrast with <strong>the</strong> Pharisee's<br />

confidence <strong>in</strong> his acceptability to God, Luke 18.10-13). 47<br />

The only passage <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Synoptic tradition which expresses this sense of<br />

conversion by means of strephö ('turn') is Matt. 18.3 — 'Truly I say to you, unless<br />

you turn and become like children, you will never enter <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>gdom of<br />

heaven' (Matt. 18.3). It seems to be Mat<strong>the</strong>w's render<strong>in</strong>g of a less radical say<strong>in</strong>g<br />

preserved <strong>in</strong> Mark 10.15/Luke 18.17. 48 But John 3.3, 5 probably <strong>in</strong>dicates that<br />

<strong>the</strong> tendency to re-express <strong>Jesus</strong>' teach<strong>in</strong>g at this po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong> more radical terms was<br />

common to more than one stream of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Jesus</strong> tradition: to enter <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>gdom it<br />

was necessary not only to become like a little child (paidion), but to become a<br />

newborn baby! And <strong>in</strong> Thomas it becomes <strong>the</strong> basis of a differently radical exposition<br />

(GTh 22). 49<br />

b. 'Believe'<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Mark <strong>Jesus</strong> called his hearers not simply to repent/convert, but also<br />

to believe —pisteuete (1.15). Mark has put <strong>the</strong> call <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> language of later missionaries<br />

— to 'believe <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> gospel'. 50 But talk of 'faith' is no stranger to <strong>the</strong><br />

46. Goppelt gives particular emphasis to <strong>the</strong> call for repentance (Theology chs. 3-4):<br />

'Each of <strong>Jesus</strong>' demands was after noth<strong>in</strong>g less than a transformation of <strong>the</strong> person from <strong>the</strong><br />

very core, i.e., total repentance' (118).<br />

47. Despite <strong>the</strong>ir sole attestation by Luke, it is widely agreed that <strong>the</strong>se parables orig<strong>in</strong>ated<br />

with <strong>Jesus</strong> (e.g., Fitzmyer, Luke 1083-86, 1183-85; Funk, Five Gospels 356-57, 369;<br />

Becker, <strong>Jesus</strong> 152, 76-77; E. Rau, 'Jesu Ause<strong>in</strong>andersetzung mit Pharisäern über se<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Zuwendung zu Sünder<strong>in</strong>nen und Sündern. Lk 15,11-32 und Lk 18,10-14a als Worte des<br />

historischen <strong>Jesus</strong>', ZNW 89 [1998] 5-29; Hultgren, Parables 83-84, 125; Lüdemann, <strong>Jesus</strong><br />

365), though Lüdemann th<strong>in</strong>ks <strong>Jesus</strong> did not speak <strong>the</strong> latter parable, because 'it is based on a<br />

fundamental hostility to <strong>the</strong> Pharisees which <strong>Jesus</strong> did not share' (376; contrast Becker 76).<br />

48. Davies and Allison suggest that <strong>the</strong> Mat<strong>the</strong>an form of <strong>the</strong> say<strong>in</strong>g is more primitive<br />

than Mark 10.15, s<strong>in</strong>ce 'receive <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>gdom' is more likely a post-Easter expression (it occurs<br />

only here <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Synoptics) <strong>in</strong> contrast to <strong>Jesus</strong>' talk of 'enter<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>gdom' (Mat<strong>the</strong>w 2.757).<br />

49. Note also GTh 46.2, which seems to have merged <strong>the</strong> thought here <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> Q tradition,<br />

Matt. 11.11/Luke 7.28. See fur<strong>the</strong>r below, §14.2.<br />

50. 'Gospel' as a noun seems to have been co<strong>in</strong>ed by Paul or early missionaries, so <strong>the</strong>re<br />

can be little doubt that '<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> gospel' is Mark's own gloss (see above, chapter 12 nn. 3-4).<br />

500

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!