09.02.2013 Views

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE MISSION OF JESUS §12.6<br />

<strong>in</strong> heaven, so on earth', Matt. 6.10b), presumably as an explanatory elaboration<br />

of <strong>the</strong> second petition ('May your k<strong>in</strong>gdom come', 6.10a). 478 Does this <strong>in</strong>dicate<br />

how <strong>the</strong> petition for <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>gdom to come was understood early on? Ei<strong>the</strong>r that<br />

<strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>gdom of God would be recognized (as present) when God's will was be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

done (on earth) 479 or that seek<strong>in</strong>g for <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>gdom would be unavail<strong>in</strong>g without<br />

striv<strong>in</strong>g to do God's will? Mat<strong>the</strong>w himself seems to draw that conclusion<br />

(Matt. 7.21). 480 Ei<strong>the</strong>r way, Mat<strong>the</strong>w's tradition does not treat <strong>the</strong> prayer for <strong>the</strong><br />

k<strong>in</strong>gdom's com<strong>in</strong>g as an aspiration which can stand alone. As Luke's subsequent<br />

account was to put it: questions about <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>gdom's future had <strong>the</strong>ir place (and<br />

sky-gaz<strong>in</strong>g was all very well), but what mattered now was <strong>the</strong> mission (Acts 1.5-<br />

11). Or as Lee Keck has more recently put it: 'The real question is not whe<strong>the</strong>r<br />

<strong>Jesus</strong> was right or wrong about <strong>the</strong> time of <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>gdom but whe<strong>the</strong>r he was right<br />

about <strong>the</strong> God whom he imaged as k<strong>in</strong>g and fa<strong>the</strong>r'. 481<br />

e. The K<strong>in</strong>gdom as Metaphor?<br />

Before we paused to take stock, <strong>the</strong> preced<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>e of reflection was lead<strong>in</strong>g us<br />

<strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> problems of conceptuality, where <strong>the</strong> basic problem is that of language<br />

itself. Language as it were forces us <strong>in</strong>to a l<strong>in</strong>guistic/semiotic box, with words<br />

hav<strong>in</strong>g to serve (<strong>in</strong>adequately) as both w<strong>in</strong>dows of <strong>in</strong>sight and l<strong>in</strong>es of communication.<br />

In do<strong>in</strong>g both, <strong>the</strong>y do nei<strong>the</strong>r very effectively. The basic issue, <strong>the</strong>n, is<br />

how language deals with time, and <strong>in</strong> particular with <strong>the</strong> future.<br />

Paul Ricoeur has observed that it is narrative which gives history its temporal<br />

flow, with <strong>the</strong> idea of beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g and end usually <strong>in</strong>herent <strong>in</strong> narrative. 482 Narrative<br />

draws on human experience and <strong>in</strong> evok<strong>in</strong>g a response from <strong>the</strong> reader mediates<br />

between what has been and what is yet to be. 483 But if we cannot<br />

478. As already noted (§8.5b), <strong>the</strong> most obvious explanation for such a difference <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

two versions of <strong>the</strong> Prayer (Mat<strong>the</strong>w's and Luke's) is liturgical elaboration. The alternative of<br />

tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> first two petitions <strong>in</strong> parallel (Gnilka, <strong>Jesus</strong> of Nazareth 137: '"name" is virtually<br />

synonymous with "k<strong>in</strong>gdom"') is less illum<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g. The possibility that <strong>the</strong> explanatory addition<br />

was 'authorized' by <strong>Jesus</strong> himself should not be excluded (see below, § 16.2b).<br />

479. See also Luz, Matthäus 1.344-45; Davies and Allison, Mat<strong>the</strong>w 1.605-606.<br />

480. Caird, Theology draws a similar conclusion with regard to <strong>Jesus</strong>: 'For <strong>Jesus</strong>, enter<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>the</strong> K<strong>in</strong>gdom was synonymous with <strong>the</strong> life of discipleship — of submitt<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> demands<br />

of <strong>the</strong> God who is K<strong>in</strong>g' (Theology 369).<br />

481. Who Is <strong>Jesus</strong>? 112.<br />

482. P. Ricoeur, Time and Narrative <strong>vol</strong>. 1 ch. 3.<br />

483. This is my much too simplified attempt to draw out for my own purposes Ricoeur's<br />

'threefold mimesis', that is, his dist<strong>in</strong>ction between mimesisj, mimesis2 and mimesis3, <strong>in</strong> which<br />

I acknowledge my debt also to D. Pellauer's Foreword to M. Joy, ed., Paul Ricoeur and Narrative<br />

(Calgary: University of Calgary, 1997) xiv-xvi. In correlation with <strong>the</strong> reflections of <strong>the</strong><br />

484

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!