09.02.2013 Views

October 2000 Newsletter - Naval Postgraduate School

October 2000 Newsletter - Naval Postgraduate School

October 2000 Newsletter - Naval Postgraduate School

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

MICRO-AIR VEHICLE AERODYNAMICS, continued from page 42<br />

shown in Figure 4.<br />

Since the resultant force must be normal to the incident<br />

flow, the resultant force vector must be tilted forward, as<br />

shown in Figure 4, which provides both a lift component and<br />

a thrust component. Knoller and Betz went one step further,<br />

and they noted that if the wing was flapped (plunging it up<br />

and down vertically in an oscillatory fashion) while the lift<br />

force would be both positive and negative during the cycle,<br />

averaging to zero, the thrust force would always be<br />

non-negative, so the average thrust would be a<br />

positive value. (For an animated demonstration of<br />

this phenomenon, visit our online version of this<br />

article at www.aa.nps.navy.mil/~jones/research/<br />

unsteady/propulsion/theory/).<br />

Prandtl’s student Birnbaum (1924) first presented a<br />

solution for incompressible flow past flapping airfoils,<br />

while Katzmayr (1922) in Vienna produced the first<br />

wind tunnel measurements which conclusively showed that<br />

an airfoil mounted in an oscillating wind stream experiences a<br />

thrust force. In the 1940’s and 50’s Schmidt (1965) in East<br />

Germany started to conduct systematic experiments on<br />

flapping foil propellers which led him to the development of<br />

the wave propeller and its demonstration on a catamaran<br />

boat. Classical oscillatory thin airfoil theory shows that the<br />

propulsive efficiency of a single harmonically plunging airfoil<br />

is only about 50 percent unless the airfoil oscillates rather<br />

slowly (which in turn requires a large airfoil in order to obtain<br />

Figure 5. Thrust Indicative Vortex Street.<br />

FEATURED PROJECT<br />

Figure 4. Induced velocity<br />

and the resultant<br />

tilting of the normal-force<br />

vector.<br />

significant thrust values). Schmidt sought to overcome this<br />

deficiency by arranging two airfoils in tandem, where the<br />

forward foil is oscillating and the rear-ward foil is stationary.<br />

This makes it possible to convert the vortical energy generated<br />

by the forward foil into additional thrust rather than being<br />

wasted. Schmidt claimed that his wave propeller achieved<br />

efficiencies comparable to those of conventional propellers<br />

and had the additional advantage of enabling operation in<br />

shallow waters.<br />

Flapping Wings Generate Vortices<br />

It is a well known fact that a vortex is generated<br />

whenever an airfoil changes its angle of attack.<br />

Therefore, a flapping airfoil continuously sheds<br />

vortices from its trailing edge. We have made extensive<br />

studies of this vortex shedding phenomenon. Two<br />

examples are shown in Figures 5 and 6, where the<br />

lower image is a photograph of the water-tunnel<br />

experiment, and the upper image is a schematic<br />

representation of the vortices. If one measures the<br />

time-average of the flow at some station downstream<br />

of the trailing edge (as we did using the previously<br />

described LDV instrumentation), one obtains the jetlike<br />

distribution schematically shown in the upper<br />

part of Figure 5. Hence the flapping wing generates a<br />

jet similar to the jet produced by a conventional<br />

propeller or jet engine.<br />

It is interesting to note, however, that when we flap<br />

--continued on page 44<br />

NPS Research page 43<br />

<strong>October</strong> <strong>2000</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!