2001-01-26 Harley-Davidson Response - Minnesota Judicial Branch

EPO‘-SOUlSH Condcnsclt IM Tcrrancc J.
P3gc 69 Page 71
i doil’l. I Dll~li(“l‘ I;XAMINA’I‘IOK
) Q. D~I you recall having any disctlssions will1 2 UY MR. ISAh(‘SON:
1 anyhtwly involvccl in 11x I larlcy-D;I\:idsc,tl husincss ahou~ Twin 3 0. Kcgarding I:xhihit Numhcr 3, woultl you lake ;I
1 Cily Iiorlcy-Davidson tmcliccs? 4 look al thal apin, plcasc?
5 A. ()lhccr Ihail Ile discussions I had inside lhc 3 A. (Wilncss coniplics.) Yc:s.
5 dwlcrsliip. no. with tllc \:ilrious s;IIcsmcIl. Wollld yell h Q. Would you look ;11 lhc: hack of ~llut shecc? Is
7 rqlirasc IhuI qucslicln. hccausc llicrc ini@ he soinclhing I 7 thcrc anything on (he hack‘?
$ have lo aiiswcr tlil‘l~rciilly’.’ s A. No.
J tJ. 1*11i curicjus il ycru’vc cvcr had any discussions 0 Q. Was thcrc anything on rllc hack 01‘ (hc original
:J or coi111ii1i1iiciltiolis with aiiyhody in lht: IHibrlcy-Davidson IO of that hill of sale when you sign4 i[?
I business rqarding Twin Cities I larlcy-Davidson practicm II A. A Ior of fine print.
2 A. Ye. other dealers loo. 12 Q. Okay. So that’s no1 the entire agreement?
3 Q. What other dcale.rs have you talked to ahout I3 A. Certainly not.
4 Twin Cities Harlq+Davidson’s practices? I4 Q. Okay.
5 A. I’rohahly cv~zry clcxtr I’ve cvcr dealt with. IS MR. ISAACSON: ‘That’s all I have. You
6 Q. And what havt: you talkti about with thm? 16 have the right to read the transcript of this deposition to
7 A. How 1 wus unhappy perticularly how thq I 7 make any corrections of errors or wrong answers or
8 -ted me. llxy chanted my dal from Point A to Point B. I 8 whatever. That would involve 96~ going either to the court
9 Q. Have you cvtx had any discussions with any IO reporter’s location or our oftis to sit down and read it
0 factory pxsunnel from Harley-Davidson? 20 and writing out corrections on a separate page. You also i
I A. No. 1 don’t know anybody. I don’t know if 21 have the right to waive that reading. And I would
2 I’ve ever talked to anyhody. factory people. 22 recommend that you read it.
3 Q. Have you ever run any adverGements that have 23 niE wrrmss: I will not waive the
4 mf&tmced Twin City Harlq-Davidson? 24 reading.
,5 A. I know my son-in-law did, and I wanti to. but 25 MR. ISAACSON: -rhank you.
Page 70 Page 7:
I I don’t know if I did. I (Whereupon, at 450 p.m., Monday, Novcmbcr 13,
2 Q. Tell me ahout your son-in-law’s advertisement. 2 2000, the taking of the deposition of TERRANCE
3 A. I don’t remember. I just thought he did 3 JOHN CARTER Was adjourned.)
4 something that had something to do with it. He just 4
5 mentioned that he didn’t buy from -- or didn’t get ripped 5
6 off from Twin Cities .South on a bike he was .selling so that 6
7 people wouldn’t think the price was too high for him to 7
8 1~~211 it, .sornething to that effect. 8 C
9 Q. And where did hc place that ad? 9
IO A. I believe it was in the Star and Tribune, I 10
I I never saw it myself. 11
L2 Q. Have you ever placed ads? 12
I3 A. I told you I had. 13
14
IS
Q. Ft refer to or reference Twin City
Ha&y-Davidson in any way?
14
15
.a
-6 A. I remember thinking about it. I don’t
16
7 remember if I ever did. I honestly don’t remember.
17
8 Q. It’s possible you did?
18
9 A. It’s possible. I’d Liked to have.
19
!O MR. LAFEBER: That’s all I have,
20
!l Mr. Carter. Thank you very much for your time.
21
!2 THE WITNESS: Thank you.
22
!3 MR. ISAACSON: I’ve got a Couple Of
23
~4 qUestions, I think.
24
15 Ill
25
Page 69 - Page 72 Kirby
-
A. Kennedy
-.
& Associates
_- --_ --- _^_C
(952) 922-lY33