2001-01-26 Harley-Davidson Response - Minnesota Judicial Branch

RIDERBENNETT
EGAN&ARUNDEL
VIA FACSIMILE AND
U.S. MAIL
Edwin L. Sisam, Esq.
Sisam & Watje, Ltd.
6600 France Avenue South
Suite360 --
Minneapolis, MN 554351804
August 24,200O
Re: Flanagan, et al v. Twin Cities Barley Davidson, Inc.
Our File No.: 12736/20139A
Dear Mr. Sisam:
Michael W. Unger
Civil Trial Spccidist
(612) 340-8953
IaminreceiptofyourletkrdatedAugust22,iuwhichyoustatethatJohnThormanisbringing
a claim “and demands immediate payment of the difference between the price he actually paid for his
motorcycle and the Barley Davidson MSRP for the particular motorcycle purchased.” As with your
other clieitts, we request that you provide us with a specific demand that indicates what your client is
clahning that amount is. Furthermore, we request that you provide us with some description ef the
fbctud basis upon which Mr. Thorman makes his allegation. Who does he claim told him that Twin
Cities Harley Davidson would sell him a new motorcycle at MSRP and when does he claim that
occumd. Whatdoesheclaimwassaid? Ifyouan~~~p~~dethis~o~onso~tmy
clientmBYCOEISidCf~c~-wewirrbcf~edtocommenceanotheraction. Pleaseadviseastoyour
response.
Finally, we are advis@that ourdeclaratoryjudgme& actionshave been’commencedunder Rule
3.01(c) with the successful delivery for service to the Sheriff.’ We agaiu renew our requestthat you
accept service to avoid uunecessary expense and potential embarrassment or inconvenience for your
clients. Plea& advise as to your intention in this ngard. Thank y&r. s
RIDER, BENNE’IT, EGAN & ARUNDEL, LLP
By
1 _-