2001-01-26 Harley-Davidson Response - Minnesota Judicial Branch

More documents

Recommendations

Info

4. Of the 22 declaratory judgment actions currently pending, 12 are located in Hennepin County where they appear to have all been assigned to the same judge. There are five cases pending in Anoka County, two in Dakota County, and one each in Scott, Rice, ad Nobles County. 5. Attached hereto as Exhibit 1 is a true and correct copy of correspondence of Eldwin Sisam dated June 23,200O. 6. Attached hereto as Exhibit 2 is a true and correct copy of correspondence of Michael W. Unger dated January 30,200O. 7. Attached hereto as Exhibit 3 is a true and correct copy of correspondence of July 6,2000, by Edwin Sisam. 8. Attached hereto as Exhibit 4 is a true and correct copy of correspondence by Michael W. Unger dated July 14,200O. 9. Attached hereto as Exhibit 5 is a true and correct copy of correspondence by Edwin Sisarn dated August 7,200O. 10. Attached hereto as Exhibit 6 is a true and correct copy of correspondence by Michael W. Unger dated August 11,200O. 11. Attached hereto as Exhibit 7 is a true and correct copy of correspondence by Edwin Sisam dated August 16,200O. 12. Attached hereto as Exhibit 8 is a true and correct copy of correspondence by Michael W. Unger dated August 22,200O. IE 13. Attached hereto as Exhibit 9 is a true and correct copy of correspondence by Michael W. Unger dated August 24,200O. . L*
e , 14. Attached hereto as Exhibit 10 is a true and correct copy of the deposition testimony of James Kinney. 15. Attached hereto as Exhibit 11 is a true and correct copy of the deposition testimony of Terrance Carter. 16. Attached hereto as Exhibit 12 is a true and correct copy of the deposition testimony of Daniel Lund. Subscribed and sworn to before me this 26* day of January, 2001. 630563-l 3 ~~~.~ I&chael W. Unger . I-
Page 1 and 2: Hand Delivered Frederick Grittner C
Page 3 and 4: agreement. The two individuals alle
Page 5 and 6: were heard and considered in Dakota
Page 7 and 8: In a case directly on point, the Mi
Page 9 and 10: Differing factual circumstances als
Page 11 and 12: A. The Number of Parties. The mere
Page 13 and 14: of the settlement and missed the de
Page 15: OFFICE OF APPEi..LbiTE COURTS STATE
Page 19 and 20: * . : , : 4. . s . Mr. Unger June 2
Page 21 and 22: 3 3 I I July 6,200O Michael W. Unge
Page 23 and 24: ‘August 7,200O Michael W. Unger R
Page 25 and 26: nr,uI,ac,, . . 1 APlcinarmlLlmlIed~
Page 27 and 28: RIDERBENNETT EGAN&.ARUNDEL . Edwin
Page 29 and 30: W”. --. -1-.* - - -- _~ . . I.1 *
Page 31 and 32: 3a be’.:. File NO. U-00-012649 3
Page 33 and 34: James ‘D. Kinncv Condcnsclt’M I
Page 35 and 36: . James D. Kinncv CondenseItTM DEPO
Page 37 and 38: ,JamcsD. Kinney CondenseIt’” DE
Page 39 and 40: I . r James D. Kinney Page 33 1 by
Page 41 and 42: I James D. Kinney CondcnseItTM DEPO
Page 43 and 44: . ‘Tmamc 1. Carter Condcnsclt’M
Page 45 and 46: 0 Tcrrancc J. Carter Condcnscl t l
Page 47 and 48: . , Tcrrancc J. Carter Page 17 I A.
Page 49 and 50: . Tcrrancc J. Carter Condcnsclt IM
Page 51 and 52: Terrance J. Carter Condcnscl t IM P
Page 53 and 54: Tcrrancc J. Caticr Condcnsclt.“M
Page 55 and 56: 1 .sell to the third guy for the sa
Page 57 and 58: . Tcrrancc J. Carter Condcnscl t IH
Page 59 and 60: xmncc J. Carter hike. Q. Boll 1 lan
Page 61 and 62: xrance J. Carter I (TEKKANC’E JOH
Page 63 and 64: . Daniel M. Lund / ---- I .4PYEAIlA
Page 65 and 66: * 9 thnicl M. Lund I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Page 67 and 68:
. I Daniel M. Lund Condensclt’M D
Page 69 and 70:
L Daniel M. Lund Condcnsclt’M DEP
Page 71 and 72:
. , aniel M. Lund Conde Page 33 I a
Page 73 and 74:
. . , Danicl M. Lund Condcn.sclt’
Page 75 and 76:
\ Z ’ Daniel M. Lund Condenselt
show all

2001-01-26 Harley-Davidson Response - Minnesota Judicial Branch

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?