Minutes of 964 Meeting of the Town Planning Board held on 20.8 ...
Minutes of 964 Meeting of the Town Planning Board held on 20.8 ... Minutes of 964 Meeting of the Town Planning Board held on 20.8 ...
- 8 - planning permission (Application No. A/TY/102) for a temporary concrete batching plant for three years up to 22.2.2011 at a site in Tsing Yi. On 18.3.2010, eleven months before
- 9 - departments in this regard was considered not necessary. 6. In response to a Member’s enquiry on
- Page 1 and 2: Present Minutes <s
- Page 3 and 4: Absent with Apologies Dr. James C.W
- Page 5 and 6: - 5 - were considered necessary; Pr
- Page 7: Background - 7 - Approval and Exten
- Page 11 and 12: - 11 - (iii) New Town</stro
- Page 13 and 14: - 13 - (i) different districts (18
- Page 15 and 16: - 15 - always permitted use under <
- Page 17 and 18: Discussion Session - 17 - should be
- Page 19 and 20: - 19 - (c) to improve the</
- Page 21 and 22: - 21 - 24. In response, Mrs. Lai Ch
- Page 23 and 24: - 23 - columbaria without combating
- Page 25 and 26: - 25 - the cemeter
- Page 27 and 28: - 27 - 34. A Member was also concer
- Page 29 and 30: - 29 - Mr. Patzold, Daniel C3 C12 M
- Page 31 and 32: - 31 - to the buil
- Page 33 and 34: - 33 - itself and its history assoc
- Page 35 and 36: - 35 - buildings, the</stro
- Page 37 and 38: - 37 - [Mr. Rock C.N. Chen returned
- Page 39 and 40: - 39 - subject zoning. The “OU”
- Page 41 and 42: - 41 - (MPC) of <s
- Page 43 and 44: - 43 - value and features o
- Page 45 and 46: - 45 - [Ms. Pansy L.P. Yau and Dr.
- Page 47 and 48: - 47 - from the <s
- Page 49 and 50: - 49 - future design and adaptive r
- Page 51 and 52: - 51 - 69. With the</strong
- Page 53 and 54: - 53 - representers’ proposals we
- Page 55 and 56: - 55 - (v) since 2005, the<
- Page 57 and 58: - 57 - (c) the rep
- 8 -<br />
planning permissi<strong>on</strong> (Applicati<strong>on</strong> No. A/TY/102) for a temporary c<strong>on</strong>crete<br />
batching plant for three years up to 22.2.2011 at a site in Tsing Yi. On<br />
18.3.2010, eleven m<strong>on</strong>ths before <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> expiry <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> temporary planning<br />
permissi<strong>on</strong> No. A/TY/102 <strong>on</strong> 22.2.2011, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> applicant submitted an<br />
applicati<strong>on</strong> for renewal <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> temporary planning permissi<strong>on</strong> for a fur<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r<br />
three years (Applicati<strong>on</strong> No. A/TY/110);<br />
(f) <strong>on</strong> 7.5.2010, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> MPC c<strong>on</strong>sidered <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> applicati<strong>on</strong> for renewal <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
temporary permissi<strong>on</strong>. Taking into account that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> applicati<strong>on</strong> was<br />
submitted almost <strong>on</strong>e year before <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> expiry <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> original planning<br />
permissi<strong>on</strong>, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> MPC c<strong>on</strong>sidered that it would be too early to c<strong>on</strong>sider <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
renewal applicati<strong>on</strong> as <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> planning circumstances might be different at <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
time nearer to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> expiry <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> planning permissi<strong>on</strong>, which might have a<br />
material bearing <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> decisi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> planning applicati<strong>on</strong>. The MPC<br />
decided to defer a decisi<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> applicati<strong>on</strong> No. A/TY/110 until a time closer<br />
to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> expiry <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> original planning permissi<strong>on</strong>;<br />
Proposed Amendment to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> TPB Guidelines No. 34A<br />
Submissi<strong>on</strong> Time for Applicati<strong>on</strong> for Renewal<br />
(g) to ensure that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Board</str<strong>on</strong>g> could take into account <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> latest planning<br />
circumstances pertaining to an applicati<strong>on</strong> for renewal <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> temporary<br />
planning permissi<strong>on</strong>, it was proposed that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> TPB Guidelines No. 34A be<br />
revised by adding a new paragraph 3.4 to stipulate that an applicati<strong>on</strong> for<br />
renewal <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> planning permissi<strong>on</strong> for temporary use should not be submitted<br />
more than four m<strong>on</strong>ths before <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> expiry <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> original temporary<br />
approval; and<br />
C<strong>on</strong>sultati<strong>on</strong><br />
(h) <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> proposed amendments to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> TPB Guidelines No. 34A were to indicate<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> time requirement for submissi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> applicati<strong>on</strong> for renewal <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
temporary planning permissi<strong>on</strong>. C<strong>on</strong>sultati<strong>on</strong> with government