Minutes of 964 Meeting of the Town Planning Board held on 20.8 ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

- 50 - Mr. Abdul Rahim Senior Design Management Architect, MTRCL Mr. Ringo K.T. Li Design Management Architect, MTRCL 67. The following representers, commenters and <strong>the</strong>ir representatives were also invited to <strong>the</strong> meeting: Representer No. 4 (R4) Ms. Tang Siu Ling R4’s representative R20 and R113 Ms. Tsang Yuk Lan R20 and R113 R78, R79, Commenter No. 31 (C31) and C35 Mr. Wong Tak Hau representative <strong>of</strong> R78, R79, C31 & C35 C30 Mr. Chan Wai Hang C30’s representative C50 Ms. Leung Yin Mui C50’s representative C54 Mr. Leung Cheuk Ho C54 R114 and C85 Mr. Lau Wing Hung R114 and C85 C88 Ms. Cheng Lai King C88’s representative 68. The Chairman extended a welcome and explained <strong>the</strong> procedures <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> hearing. He <strong>the</strong>n invited DPO/HK to brief Members on <strong>the</strong> representations.
- 51 - 69. With <strong>the</strong> aid <strong>of</strong> a Powerpoint presentation, Mr. Derek Cheung made <strong>the</strong> following main points as detailed in <strong>the</strong> Paper: (a) on 5.2.2010, <strong>the</strong> draft Sai Ying Pun & Sheung Wan OZP No. S/H3/23 was exhibited for public inspection under section 5 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Town</strong> <strong>Planning</strong> Ordinance (<strong>the</strong> Ordinance). During <strong>the</strong> two-month exhibition period, a total <strong>of</strong> 114 representations were received. On 16.4.2010, <strong>the</strong> representations were published for public comments. During <strong>the</strong> three-week publication period, a total <strong>of</strong> 89 comments were received; (b) <strong>the</strong> 112 representations (R3 to R114) in Group 2 were against <strong>the</strong> deletion <strong>of</strong> a portion <strong>of</strong> “Government, Institution or Community” (“G/IC”) zone and <strong>the</strong> incorporation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mass Transit Railway (MTR) Station Entrance, Ventilation and Plant Building under <strong>the</strong> authorized West Island Line scheme at 9B Bonham Road under Amendment Item F. C30 to C89 supported all <strong>the</strong> 112 representations (R3 to R114); (c) <strong>the</strong> main grounds <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> representations and <strong>the</strong>ir proposals were summarised in paragraph 2.2 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Paper and highlighted below: (i) air and noise pollution - <strong>the</strong> representation site was surrounded by residential buildings, a school and a community complex, which would be subject to <strong>the</strong> adverse air and noise impacts generated by <strong>the</strong> ventilation shaft and <strong>the</strong> chiller plant <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> proposed building. The ventilation shaft would operate long hours daily. It would seriously deteriorate <strong>the</strong> air quality at Bonham Road. The water cooling tower might cause legionnaire’s disease which would affect <strong>the</strong> health <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> nearby residents; (ii) separation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ventilation and plant building from <strong>the</strong> nearby buildings - <strong>the</strong> 5m gap between <strong>the</strong> chiller plant and <strong>the</strong> vent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> proposed building and <strong>the</strong> nearby residential buildings was not acceptable. It failed to follow <strong>the</strong> guidelines given by <strong>the</strong>
Page 1 and 2: Present Minutes <s
Page 3 and 4: Absent with Apologies Dr. James C.W
Page 5 and 6: - 5 - were considered necessary; Pr
Page 7 and 8: Background - 7 - Approval and Exten
Page 9 and 10: - 9 - departments in this regard wa
Page 11 and 12: - 11 - (iii) New Town</stro
Page 13 and 14: - 13 - (i) different districts (18
Page 15 and 16: - 15 - always permitted use under <
Page 17 and 18: Discussion Session - 17 - should be
Page 19 and 20: - 19 - (c) to improve the</
Page 21 and 22: - 21 - 24. In response, Mrs. Lai Ch
Page 23 and 24: - 23 - columbaria without combating
Page 25 and 26: - 25 - the cemeter
Page 27 and 28: - 27 - 34. A Member was also concer
Page 29 and 30: - 29 - Mr. Patzold, Daniel C3 C12 M
Page 31 and 32: - 31 - to the buil
Page 33 and 34: - 33 - itself and its history assoc
Page 35 and 36: - 35 - buildings, the</stro
Page 37 and 38: - 37 - [Mr. Rock C.N. Chen returned
Page 39 and 40: - 39 - subject zoning. The “OU”
Page 41 and 42: - 41 - (MPC) of <s
Page 43 and 44: - 43 - value and features o
Page 45 and 46: - 45 - [Ms. Pansy L.P. Yau and Dr.
Page 47 and 48: - 47 - from the <s
Page 49: - 49 - future design and adaptive r
Page 53 and 54: - 53 - representers’ proposals we
Page 55 and 56: - 55 - (v) since 2005, the<
Page 57 and 58: - 57 - (c) the rep
Page 59 and 60: - 59 - (a) the Adm
Page 61 and 62: - 61 - then she re
Page 63 and 64: - 63 - (d) according to MTRC’s st
Page 65 and 66: - 65 - 88. Ms. Tsang Yuk Lan, R20 a
Page 67 and 68: - 67 - the station
Page 69 and 70: - 69 - 106. A Member suggested that
Page 71 and 72: - 71 - 111. After deliberation, <st
Page 73 and 74: - 73 - (c) departmental comments -
Page 75 and 76: - 75 - applications had been compli
Page 77 and 78: - 77 - (e) the exi
Page 79 and 80: - 79 - (a) the set
Page 81 and 82: - 81 - apply to his Office for Shor
Page 83 and 84: Agenda Item 9 [Open Meeting
Page 85 and 86: - 85 - Professor E

Minutes of 964 Meeting of the Town Planning Board held on 20.8 ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?