06.02.2013 Views

ESA Document - Emits - ESA

ESA Document - Emits - ESA

ESA Document - Emits - ESA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

s<br />

HMM<br />

Assessment Study<br />

Report: CDF-20(A)<br />

February 2004<br />

page 78 of 422<br />

be allowed. In this case northern latitudes are preferred as the dust storms coincide with<br />

the winter.<br />

2.7.12 Abort Options<br />

In the event of a failure or emergency that precludes completion as planned, the mission will<br />

have to be aborted. Two categories of failures have been considered:<br />

• Failures in equipment/subsystems<br />

• Failures in manoeuvres/operations<br />

The first category is dealt with at subsystem design level by making the design fail safe. For the<br />

second category, mission-abort scenarios have been considered.<br />

In the event of a mission abort, the original mission objectives shift to a safe return of the crew,<br />

as soon as possible and within the constraints dictated by the system design. Any defined abort<br />

scenario must be consistent with all budgets imposed for the various subsystems, e.g., propellant,<br />

thermal, structural, power or ECLSS consumables.<br />

Firstly, the abort options for each phase of the mission require study. Then the cost (in terms of<br />

the budget of each relevant subsystem) must be quantified for each identified option. The<br />

outcome is to know what can conceivably be done to save the crew at each point of the mission.<br />

The options for a mission abort strongly depend on the selected scenario. Here, the study is<br />

limited to the baseline scenario as studied for the 2033 launch opportunity.<br />

First, the options per mission phase were analysed. Then, the abort cost for each option was<br />

quantified and listed.<br />

2.7.12.1 Phase-by-phase analysis<br />

The mission phases were studied chronologically, starting from Earth escape and ending with the<br />

return trajectory from Mars to Earth.<br />

2.7.12.1.1 Abort during Earth escape<br />

The Earth escape sequence is split into three manoeuvres, each of which further raises the<br />

apogee until a hyperbolic orbit with the required orbital parameters is achieved. Any of these<br />

burns can be prematurely terminated. For over 90% of the total manoeuvre duration, abort leaves<br />

the spacecraft still in a wide elliptical orbit around the Earth. The crew will have to wait until the<br />

next perigee to be able to then board the entry capsule and return to Earth’s surface.<br />

2.7.12.1.2 Fast abort during Mars transfer<br />

The fast option requires a large DSM to insert the spacecraft into a trajectory that intersects the<br />

Earth’s orbit. The nominal mission parameters are shown for comparison with the abort transfer<br />

characteristics in Table 2-27:<br />

• Earth escape date: 8 April 2033<br />

• Nominal Mars arrival date: 24 October 2033<br />

• Nominal Earth arrival date: October - November 2035<br />

• Nominal mission duration (maximum): 962 days<br />

• Nominal Earth arrival velocity (maximum): 3.052 km/s

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!