06.02.2013 Views

ESA Document - Emits - ESA

ESA Document - Emits - ESA

ESA Document - Emits - ESA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

s<br />

HMM<br />

Assessment Study<br />

Report: CDF-20(A)<br />

February 2004<br />

page 76 of 422<br />

• The global dust storm season on Mars. This occurs for approximately 3 months on either<br />

side of the Martian perihelion passage.<br />

• Superior conjunction (i.e. the Earth and Mars are on opposite sides of the Sun). In this<br />

situation there is a communications difficulty that can last for up to 55 days (an angle of<br />

10° either side of the Sun).<br />

• Martian winter at the landing site if power is supplied by solar arrays. The power<br />

subsystem provides a cut-off associated with the size of the solar arrays. In winter the<br />

solar flux reaching the Martian surface is reduced so the lander would have insufficient<br />

power. The exact length of the excluded time period depends on the landing site latitude.<br />

There is a trade-off to ensure that the size of the solar arrays does not impact too greatly<br />

on other subsystems by providing more opportunities for surface stays. In the case of a<br />

fuel cell power source, the landing site and hence the Martian season are immaterial.<br />

In addition there are several mission operations during which the surface stay cannot take place.<br />

These are:<br />

• Aerobraking<br />

• Final Martian orbit acquisition<br />

• System check. These are assumed to last 1 week after arrival in the final Martian orbit<br />

and 2 weeks before departure on the return journey to Earth.<br />

• MAV-TV rendezvous. This can take several days at the end of the surface stay.<br />

The analysis took into account:<br />

• Selection of the power source used, whether solar arrays or fuel cells.<br />

• Selection of one of four landing site latitudes: 21°N, 12.5°N, 12.5°S and 22.5°S.<br />

However, in the case of using fuel cells, the landing site is immaterial.<br />

• Selection of whether or not to include dust deposition on the solar arrays when<br />

considering the power constraints.<br />

Figure 2-38 shows how the opportunities vary when the landing site and the aerobraking<br />

manoeuvre are taken into account. Note that the fuel cell case is the same as the best case of<br />

each of the solar cell launch window scenarios. Aerobraking manoeuvres are considered to last<br />

six months in this case also.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!