06.02.2013 Views

ESA Document - Emits - ESA

ESA Document - Emits - ESA

ESA Document - Emits - ESA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

s<br />

Total Mass to LEO (Ton)<br />

1240<br />

1235<br />

1230<br />

1225<br />

1220<br />

1215<br />

1210<br />

1205<br />

1200<br />

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000<br />

Altitude (km)<br />

Radiation increment %<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000<br />

Altitude (km)<br />

HMM<br />

Assessment Study<br />

Report: CDF-20(A)<br />

February 2004<br />

page 60 of 422<br />

Figure 2-27: Orbit around Mars<br />

Figure 3-32 shows on the left that the variation in the total mass to LEO versus altitude is<br />

negligible. The dose received by the astronauts above the low Mars orbit, as the effectiveness of<br />

the planet shielding is reduced. Orbit decay is not a problem above 500 km.<br />

The baseline of 500 km circular has therefore been chosen and the inclination of the final orbit<br />

has been taken as the optimal one for departure.<br />

2.7.6.7 MEV release<br />

There are two possibilities for releasing of the MEV: while still in high elliptical orbit before the<br />

final orbit acquisition, or once the orbit has been circularized. In principle, the first option and<br />

reduce mass, as the mass to be put into the circular orbit is lower.<br />

MEV released from HEO MEV released from LMO<br />

Mass to LEO (tonne) 1312 1336<br />

Table 2-17: Mass to LEO as function of the MEV release strategy<br />

Release from high elliptical orbit provides very little mass advantage, which is not compensated<br />

by the increment in complexity. Furthermore, the TV would have little time (the surface stay<br />

time) to reach the final rendezvous orbit with the MAV from release, which significantly raises<br />

the risk of the mission. Finally, release may not be possible at arrival because of dust storms, so<br />

the TV would have to wait in HEO until the landing is feasible.<br />

A MEV release from the final circular orbit has been therefore selected.<br />

2.7.6.8 All-up / Split scenarios<br />

An all-up scenario is defined as one in which the mission composite is sent to Mars in one<br />

vehicle, with all the required vehicles and infrastructures in one go. The split scenario is the one<br />

in which some of the infrastructures and/or vehicles are sent in a different composite vehicle.<br />

Two possible split scenarios have been considered:<br />

1. Two identical vehicles with three crew members each, one carrying a MEV and both<br />

carrying an ERC.<br />

2. One vehicle including THM+ERC and one only the MEV, which will have to<br />

rendezvous with the THM+ERC in Mars orbit before descent.<br />

The means to come back and consumables have to be included in every crewed vehicle. In this<br />

way the crew can survive if any of the rendezvous manoeuvres fails.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!