ESA Document - Emits - ESA
ESA Document - Emits - ESA ESA Document - Emits - ESA
s Technology Isp (s) Structural index (%) Storable 345 8 Cryogenic 450 11 Table 2-9: Propulsion technologies characteristics HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-20(A) February 2004 page 48 of 422 Note that actual storable technology for such thrust levels provide an Isp of 325 s. Here an optimistic approach has been taken. 2.7.5.4 Waste management As the consumables are used, waste is generated. The waste is defined as the goods or material that once used, cannot be recycled. The amount of waste produced is directly linked to the level of closure of the life support system. For a mission of six crew members with a duration of around 1000 days and the levels of closure presented before, the total waste generated is 5.4 tonnes. The assumption is that the waste produced up to the MOI is discarded so the payload mass for this propulsive manoeuvre is reduced. The same applies to the TEI manoeuvre, the waste produced from the MOI till the TEI is also discarded. 2.7.5.5 Assembly in orbit For the assembly of the composite in Earth orbit it has been assumed a circular orbit of 400 km altitude. The inclination depends on each trip opportunity to Mars, i.e. 62 degress for the 2033 opportunity. 2.7.5.6 Parking orbit around Mars As parking orbit around Mars it has been assumed a circular orbit of 500 km altitude with the required inclination for the return to Earth trajectory, which also depends on the trip opportunity, i.e. 32 degrees is the one for the 2033 opportunity. 2.7.5.7 Launcher The biggest launcher selected for the analysis is the Russian Energia. The performances assumed for this launcher are shown in Table 2-10: Energia performances Mass to 400x400 (tonnes) 80 Fairing diameter (m) 6 Fairing length (m) 35 Table 2-10: Energia assumed performances Other launchers potentially usable are: • Ariane-5 (EC-B version) • Proton (K version) • Soyuz • Space Shuttle (only if crewed missions are required during the assembly in LEO)
s 2.7.5.8 MEV release The MEV is released from the parking orbit at Mars, 500x500 km. 2.7.5.9 Strategy on Earth return HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-20(A) February 2004 page 49 of 422 The ERC is assumed to perform a direct entry on Earth return. The THM is separated and put on and Earth avoidance trajectory. The following table gives a summary of the design point for the trade-offs: Design Point THM dry mass 55.4 tonnes MEV dry mass 29 tonnes ERC dry mass 10.2 tonnes ECLSS level of closure: Oxygen Potable water Grey water(condensate, used hygiene water) Yellow water(water in contact with urine) Black water(water in contact with faces) Solid organic waste to food Solid inorganic waste Packaging reuse Consumable mass for the THM 10.2 tonnes Waste mass 5.4 tonnes Waste discarded prior to MOI and TEI Cryogenic propulsion Isp 450 sec Cryogenic propulsion structural index 11% Storable propulsion Isp 345 sec Storable propulsion structural index 8% In orbit assembly orbit 400 X 400 km, 62 degrees Energia performances: Mass to LEO Fairing diameter Fairing length % 95 95 95 95 20 20 0 0 80 tonnes 6 m 35 m Other launchers used Ariane-5, Proton, Soyuz, Space Shuttle MEV released From parking orbit 500 x 500, 32 degrees THM Discarded on Earth arrival Strategy for Earth return Direct entry of ERC Table 2-11: Design point and assumptions for trade-offs
- Page 1 and 2: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 3 and 4: s STUDY TEAM HMM Assessment Study R
- Page 5 and 6: s T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S HMM
- Page 7 and 8: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 9 and 10: s L I S T O F F I G U R E S HMM Ass
- Page 11 and 12: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 13 and 14: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 15 and 16: s L I S T O F T A B L E S HMM Asses
- Page 17 and 18: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 19 and 20: s 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background HMM
- Page 21 and 22: s 2 GENERAL ARCHITECTURE 2.1 Study
- Page 23 and 24: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 25 and 26: s 2.2.4.2 Accelerations HMM Assessm
- Page 27 and 28: s 2.2.4.4 Temperature and relative
- Page 29 and 30: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 31 and 32: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 33 and 34: s Figure 2-10: Trajectory Overview
- Page 35 and 36: s 2.4.3.5 TEI and planetary protect
- Page 37 and 38: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 39 and 40: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 41 and 42: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 43 and 44: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 45 and 46: s Mars Excursion Vehicle Transfer H
- Page 47: s 2.7.5.1 Mission elements dry mass
- Page 51 and 52: s Total mission time (days) 1200 10
- Page 53 and 54: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 55 and 56: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 57 and 58: s stack 9 Propellant mass of the ne
- Page 59 and 60: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 61 and 62: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 63 and 64: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 65 and 66: s The core supporting structure has
- Page 67 and 68: s 2.7.7.1.3 Mars excursion module S
- Page 69 and 70: s 2.7.7.1.4 Earth return capsule HM
- Page 71 and 72: s Mission Phase Description Event s
- Page 73 and 74: s Mission Phase Description Event s
- Page 75 and 76: s 2.7.10 Mission performance Table
- Page 77 and 78: s Days on Martian surface 450 400 3
- Page 79 and 80: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 81 and 82: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 83 and 84: s Maximum manoeuvre duration 6 mont
- Page 85 and 86: s % of loss from baseline 20 18 16
- Page 87 and 88: s 2.7.15 Sensitivity analysis HMM A
- Page 89 and 90: s 2.7.15.4 Influence of the mass of
- Page 91 and 92: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 93 and 94: s Parameters used: • No Shuttle
- Page 95 and 96: s 2.8.3.3 Launch 3- Front node Figu
- Page 97 and 98: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
s<br />
Technology Isp (s) Structural index (%)<br />
Storable 345 8<br />
Cryogenic 450 11<br />
Table 2-9: Propulsion technologies characteristics<br />
HMM<br />
Assessment Study<br />
Report: CDF-20(A)<br />
February 2004<br />
page 48 of 422<br />
Note that actual storable technology for such thrust levels provide an Isp of 325 s. Here an<br />
optimistic approach has been taken.<br />
2.7.5.4 Waste management<br />
As the consumables are used, waste is generated. The waste is defined as the goods or material<br />
that once used, cannot be recycled. The amount of waste produced is directly linked to the level<br />
of closure of the life support system. For a mission of six crew members with a duration of<br />
around 1000 days and the levels of closure presented before, the total waste generated is 5.4<br />
tonnes.<br />
The assumption is that the waste produced up to the MOI is discarded so the payload mass for<br />
this propulsive manoeuvre is reduced. The same applies to the TEI manoeuvre, the waste<br />
produced from the MOI till the TEI is also discarded.<br />
2.7.5.5 Assembly in orbit<br />
For the assembly of the composite in Earth orbit it has been assumed a circular orbit of 400 km<br />
altitude. The inclination depends on each trip opportunity to Mars, i.e. 62 degress for the 2033<br />
opportunity.<br />
2.7.5.6 Parking orbit around Mars<br />
As parking orbit around Mars it has been assumed a circular orbit of 500 km altitude with the<br />
required inclination for the return to Earth trajectory, which also depends on the trip opportunity,<br />
i.e. 32 degrees is the one for the 2033 opportunity.<br />
2.7.5.7 Launcher<br />
The biggest launcher selected for the analysis is the Russian Energia. The performances assumed<br />
for this launcher are shown in Table 2-10:<br />
Energia performances<br />
Mass to 400x400 (tonnes) 80<br />
Fairing diameter (m) 6<br />
Fairing length (m) 35<br />
Table 2-10: Energia assumed performances<br />
Other launchers potentially usable are:<br />
• Ariane-5 (EC-B version)<br />
• Proton (K version)<br />
• Soyuz<br />
• Space Shuttle (only if crewed missions are required during the assembly in LEO)