ESA Document - Emits - ESA
ESA Document - Emits - ESA ESA Document - Emits - ESA
s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-20(A) February 2004 page 390 of 422 The hatch diametre is sized to fit within the (current) IBDM tunnel; ≈800 mm. Both hatches will require Latch and Seal mechanisms. Mass estimates shall be realised using a ‘simple geometry’ model. A disposable cover shall be implemented over the outer surface of the Egress hatch door. The method of separation shall be pyrotechnic bolts. Vehicle Separation: The separation of the MAV first and second stages shall be realised with a pyrotechnic operated Clamp-band of about ∅1.5 to ∅2.0. 4.5.6.4 Budgets Element 3: Mars Ascent Vehicle MASS [kg] DIMENSIONS [m] Unit Element 3 Unit Name Quantity Mass per Maturity Level Margin Total Mass Dim1 Dim2 Dim3 Click on button below to insert new unit quantity incl. margin Length Width Height 1 Docking Mechanism- IBDM 1 334.4 To be modified 10 367.8 1.371 0.813 0.254 2 Electronic Box- IBDM 6 8.8 To be modified 10 58.1 0.4 0.25 0.25 3 Hatch Door- Egress External 2 18.0 To be developed 20 43.2 0.9 0.01 4 Hatch Door Locking Mechanisms- Egress Externa 2 120.0 To be developed 20 288.0 0.95 0.80 0.05 5 Hatch Door Cont. Protection Cover 1 15.0 To be modified 10 16.5 6 Clamp-band- Stage 1/Stage 2 I/F 1 15.6 To be modified 10 17.2 1.200 - Click on button below to insert new unit To be developed 20 0.0 - ELEMENT 3 SUBSYSTEM TOTAL 6 693.8 14.0 790.8 Table 4-60: MAV Mass Budget Unit Element 3 Unit Name Quantity Ppeak DESM DESM DESM Click on button below to insert new unit Pon Pstby Dc 1 Docking Mechanism- IBDM 1 784.0 1.1 2 Electronic Box- IBDM 6 3 Hatch Door- Egress External 2 4 Hatch Door Locking Mechanisms- Egress Externa 2 5 Hatch Door Cont. Protection Cover 1 6 Clamp-band- Stage 1/Stage 2 I/F 1 - Click on button below to insert new unit - ELEMENT 3 SUBSYSTEM TOTAL 6 0.0 784.0 0.0 Table 4-61: Power Budget- Descent Element 3: Mars Ascent Vehicle AND POWER SPECIFICATION PER M Unit Element 3 Unit Name Quantity Ppeak RVDM RVDM RVDM Click on button below to insert new unit Pon Pstby Dc 1 Docking Mechanism- IBDM 1 1806.0 12.7 2 Electronic Box- IBDM 6 152.0 75.7 3 Hatch Door- Egress External 2 4 Hatch Door Locking Mechanisms- Egress Externa 2 5 Hatch Door Cont. Protection Cover 1 6 Clamp-band- Stage 1/Stage 2 I/F 1 - Click on button below to insert new unit - ELEMENT 3 SUBSYSTEM TOTAL 6 0.0 1958.0 0.0 Table 4-62: Power Budget- Docking
s Element 3: Mars Ascent Vehicle HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-20(A) February 2004 page 391 of 422 TEMPERATURE REQs [deg C] Unit Element 3 Unit Name Quantity Operation Operation NOP NOP Click on button below to insert new unit (max) (min) (max) (min) 1 Docking Mechanism- IBDM 1 50.0 -50.0 100.0 -100.0 2 Electronic Box- IBDM 6 50.0 -20.0 70.0 -50.0 3 Hatch Door- Egress External 2 4 Hatch Door Locking Mechanisms- Egress Externa 2 5 Hatch Door Cont. Protection Cover 1 6 Clamp-band- Stage 1/Stage 2 I/F 1 - Click on button below to insert new unit - ELEMENT 3 SUBSYSTEM TOTAL 6 4.5.7 Propulsion Table 4-63: Thermal Constraints 4.5.7.1 Requirements and design drivers The payload mass for ascent is estimated 4200 kg. A thrust of 130 kN is required for the first stage to maintain the T/M ratio at acceptable value A thrust of 20 kN is required for the second stage to maintain the T/M ratio at the same value 4.5.7.2 Assumptions and trade-offs The ascent manoeuvre is staged in with two different modules. Only storable bi-propellant are considered. No attitude and steering manoeuvres are considered 4.5.7.3 Baseline design 1 st stage Four improved pump feed version of the AESTUS engine has been chosen as propulsion system for the first stage. The engine derives from the AESTUS pressure feed engine used in Ariane-5 upper stage. Recently this engine was proposed in a pump-feed version with an increase of the Isp performances and reduced system mass derived from the relaxed pressure tank operating system typical of pump feed engines. The engine nozzle has been resized (shortened) for the Martian atmosphere with reduced performances in Isp and thrust level in comparison to the vacuum performances The propulsion system presents the following characteristics:
- Page 339 and 340: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 341 and 342: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 343 and 344: s 2 3.9 233 923.1 347 923 12.3 352
- Page 345 and 346: s Figure 4-85: Communications MEV/M
- Page 347 and 348: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 349 and 350: s 4.4.5.3.2 GNC equipment HMM Asses
- Page 351 and 352: s 4.4.5.4 Control laws generation H
- Page 353 and 354: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 355 and 356: s Finally, the Figure 4-97 shown th
- Page 357 and 358: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 359 and 360: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 361 and 362: s velocity (m/sec) altitude (km) 50
- Page 363 and 364: s 4.5 Mars Ascent Vehicle 4.5.1 Tra
- Page 365 and 366: s Term Value Unit Radius of equator
- Page 367 and 368: s 4.5.2.1 Requirements and design d
- Page 369 and 370: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 371 and 372: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 373 and 374: s Inclination (deg) 47.5 47 46.5 46
- Page 375 and 376: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 377 and 378: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 379 and 380: s 4.5.3 Structures HMM Assessment S
- Page 381 and 382: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 383 and 384: s 4.5.5 Thermal HMM Assessment Stud
- Page 385 and 386: s 4.5.5.3 Baseline thermal design H
- Page 387 and 388: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 389: s Crew Ingress/Egress Hatch: HMM As
- Page 393 and 394: s 4.5.7.5 Budgets Characteristic Va
- Page 395 and 396: s PER DAY PER MISSION DRINKING WATE
- Page 397 and 398: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 399 and 400: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 401 and 402: s 5 OVERALL CONCLUSIONS HMM Assessm
- Page 403 and 404: s 6 APPENDIX A - MARTIAN SURFACE NU
- Page 405 and 406: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 407 and 408: s Figure 6-1: Example of buried rea
- Page 409 and 410: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 411 and 412: s 7 APPENDIX B - REFERENCES [RD1] C
- Page 413 and 414: s [RD26] IES2, Phase A0: Final Repo
- Page 415 and 416: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 417 and 418: s [RD85] Mars Transportation Enviro
- Page 419 and 420: s 8 APPENDIX C - ACRONYMS AAA Avion
- Page 421 and 422: s MLI Multi-Layer Insulation MMH Mo
s<br />
Element 3: Mars Ascent Vehicle<br />
HMM<br />
Assessment Study<br />
Report: CDF-20(A)<br />
February 2004<br />
page 391 of 422<br />
TEMPERATURE REQs [deg C]<br />
Unit Element 3 Unit Name<br />
Quantity Operation Operation NOP NOP<br />
Click on button below to insert new unit<br />
(max) (min) (max) (min)<br />
1 Docking Mechanism- IBDM 1 50.0 -50.0 100.0 -100.0<br />
2 Electronic Box- IBDM 6 50.0 -20.0 70.0 -50.0<br />
3 Hatch Door- Egress External 2<br />
4 Hatch Door Locking Mechanisms- Egress Externa 2<br />
5 Hatch Door Cont. Protection Cover 1<br />
6 Clamp-band- Stage 1/Stage 2 I/F 1<br />
- Click on button below to insert new unit<br />
-<br />
ELEMENT 3 SUBSYSTEM TOTAL<br />
6<br />
4.5.7 Propulsion<br />
Table 4-63: Thermal Constraints<br />
4.5.7.1 Requirements and design drivers<br />
The payload mass for ascent is estimated 4200 kg.<br />
A thrust of 130 kN is required for the first stage to maintain the T/M ratio at acceptable value<br />
A thrust of 20 kN is required for the second stage to maintain the T/M ratio at the same value<br />
4.5.7.2 Assumptions and trade-offs<br />
The ascent manoeuvre is staged in with two different modules.<br />
Only storable bi-propellant are considered.<br />
No attitude and steering manoeuvres are considered<br />
4.5.7.3 Baseline design 1 st stage<br />
Four improved pump feed version of the AESTUS engine has been chosen as propulsion system<br />
for the first stage.<br />
The engine derives from the AESTUS pressure feed engine used in Ariane-5 upper stage.<br />
Recently this engine was proposed in a pump-feed version with an increase of the Isp<br />
performances and reduced system mass derived from the relaxed pressure tank operating system<br />
typical of pump feed engines.<br />
The engine nozzle has been resized (shortened) for the Martian atmosphere with reduced<br />
performances in Isp and thrust level in comparison to the vacuum performances<br />
The propulsion system presents the following characteristics: