ESA Document - Emits - ESA
ESA Document - Emits - ESA ESA Document - Emits - ESA
s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-20(A) February 2004 page 384 of 422 • guaranteeing by adequate provision of thermal hardware for the whole mission (necessary autonomy of the crew) • fully verifying and testing the TCS on ground 4.5.5.2 Assumptions 4.5.5.2.1 Transfer, rendezvous and docking phases thermal environment The same environment as for the transfer vehicle applies for the Mars Excursion vehicle including the ascent vehicle. A conservative approach is to consider envelopes through worstcase scenarios: Solar flux [W/m 2 ] Planet albedo Planet IR [W/m 2 ] Hot case (Earth LEO, WS, 1 AU) 1423 0.33 241 Hot case (Mars orbit, perihelion, 1.38 AU) 2 717 0.29 (subsolar) 470 (subsolar) to 30 Cold case (Mars orbit, aphelion, 1.66 AU) 3 493 0.29 (subsolar) 315 (subsolar) to 30 Table 4-57: Thermal cases definition The docking has an envelope of maximal 4 days starting from the take off. 4.5.5.2.2 Martian thermal environment The same environment as for the Habitation Module applies. 4.5.5.2.3 Martian ascent phase Altitude (km) 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 Altitude (km) Velocity (km/s) 1 0.5 0 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 Time (s) 4.5.5.2.4 Man-induced thermal loads 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 Inertial Velocity (km/s) Dynamic Pressure (Pa) 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 Time (s) Figure 4-117: Flight Environment (from Trajectory analysis) Dynamic Pressure (Pa) Heat Flux (kW/m2) The thermal design shall manage all internal heat loads resulting from the human activities and various dissipating equipments: • Total mean heat load of 582W during ascent and parking orbit phases, 931W during rendezvous and docking phase. • Metabolic dissipation is estimated to be 110W (steady activity) per crew (x 3) 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 Heat Flux (kW/m2)
s 4.5.5.3 Baseline thermal design HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-20(A) February 2004 page 385 of 422 4.5.5.3.1 Ascent vehicle thermal control With no direct expertise in Europe available for such vehicle, the design block proposed is based partly on the exploitation of foreign existing heritage: Apollo LM, LOK (derived Soyuz). Space station fluid loops technologies are applicable to a certain extent (shall work against gravity). The thermal control philosophy adopted for such vehicle is standard and relies on the following approach: • simplification of the heat transfer with maximal use of thermal decoupling when possible • use of thermal-regulated bus to recuperate and transfer internal heat to heat sinks • use of switch capability to modulate this transfer and balance the heat inputs from the outputs, and thus maintain temperatures within a certain bandwidth This is implemented using appropriate materials and technologies combining passive or active means. 4.5.5.3.2 Thermal bus and radiator • Docked and descent phases Due to the staging with the SHM, a direct connection is designed with the SHM (quick disconnect). As long as this coupling exist, the SH module thermal bus is used providing a cooling capability when necessary. • Landed phase The cooling capability designed for the free flight phases is used in conjunction with the SHM heat rejection system. • Ascent, rendezvous and docking phases Considering the requirement of 4 days, a complete and independent thermal control system has to be designed. A Soyuz / LOK type thermal control is adopted: • The secondary fluid loop is based on Polymethylsiloxane as working fluid, the radiator located on the lateral sides of the main cylindrical body • The primary loop is based on water as working fluid, both lines connected via a heat exchanger On the basis of 931W of rejected power and 330W metabolic heat, a radiator size of 8 m 2 is needed. This is implemented in a cylindrical shape type (eight surfaces of 3.6 m x 0.71 m length).
- Page 333 and 334: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 335 and 336: s Figure 4-72: Entry Velocity (L) a
- Page 337 and 338: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 339 and 340: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 341 and 342: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 343 and 344: s 2 3.9 233 923.1 347 923 12.3 352
- Page 345 and 346: s Figure 4-85: Communications MEV/M
- Page 347 and 348: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 349 and 350: s 4.4.5.3.2 GNC equipment HMM Asses
- Page 351 and 352: s 4.4.5.4 Control laws generation H
- Page 353 and 354: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 355 and 356: s Finally, the Figure 4-97 shown th
- Page 357 and 358: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 359 and 360: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 361 and 362: s velocity (m/sec) altitude (km) 50
- Page 363 and 364: s 4.5 Mars Ascent Vehicle 4.5.1 Tra
- Page 365 and 366: s Term Value Unit Radius of equator
- Page 367 and 368: s 4.5.2.1 Requirements and design d
- Page 369 and 370: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 371 and 372: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 373 and 374: s Inclination (deg) 47.5 47 46.5 46
- Page 375 and 376: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 377 and 378: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 379 and 380: s 4.5.3 Structures HMM Assessment S
- Page 381 and 382: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 383: s 4.5.5 Thermal HMM Assessment Stud
- Page 387 and 388: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 389 and 390: s Crew Ingress/Egress Hatch: HMM As
- Page 391 and 392: s Element 3: Mars Ascent Vehicle HM
- Page 393 and 394: s 4.5.7.5 Budgets Characteristic Va
- Page 395 and 396: s PER DAY PER MISSION DRINKING WATE
- Page 397 and 398: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 399 and 400: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 401 and 402: s 5 OVERALL CONCLUSIONS HMM Assessm
- Page 403 and 404: s 6 APPENDIX A - MARTIAN SURFACE NU
- Page 405 and 406: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 407 and 408: s Figure 6-1: Example of buried rea
- Page 409 and 410: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 411 and 412: s 7 APPENDIX B - REFERENCES [RD1] C
- Page 413 and 414: s [RD26] IES2, Phase A0: Final Repo
- Page 415 and 416: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 417 and 418: s [RD85] Mars Transportation Enviro
- Page 419 and 420: s 8 APPENDIX C - ACRONYMS AAA Avion
- Page 421 and 422: s MLI Multi-Layer Insulation MMH Mo
s<br />
4.5.5.3 Baseline thermal design<br />
HMM<br />
Assessment Study<br />
Report: CDF-20(A)<br />
February 2004<br />
page 385 of 422<br />
4.5.5.3.1 Ascent vehicle thermal control<br />
With no direct expertise in Europe available for such vehicle, the design block proposed is based<br />
partly on the exploitation of foreign existing heritage: Apollo LM, LOK (derived Soyuz). Space<br />
station fluid loops technologies are applicable to a certain extent (shall work against gravity).<br />
The thermal control philosophy adopted for such vehicle is standard and relies on the following<br />
approach:<br />
• simplification of the heat transfer with maximal use of thermal decoupling when<br />
possible<br />
• use of thermal-regulated bus to recuperate and transfer internal heat to heat sinks<br />
• use of switch capability to modulate this transfer and balance the heat inputs from the<br />
outputs, and thus maintain temperatures within a certain bandwidth<br />
This is implemented using appropriate materials and technologies combining passive or active<br />
means.<br />
4.5.5.3.2 Thermal bus and radiator<br />
• Docked and descent phases<br />
Due to the staging with the SHM, a direct connection is designed with the SHM (quick<br />
disconnect). As long as this coupling exist, the SH module thermal bus is used providing a<br />
cooling capability when necessary.<br />
• Landed phase<br />
The cooling capability designed for the free flight phases is used in conjunction with the SHM<br />
heat rejection system.<br />
• Ascent, rendezvous and docking phases<br />
Considering the requirement of 4 days, a complete and independent thermal control system has<br />
to be designed. A Soyuz / LOK type thermal control is adopted:<br />
• The secondary fluid loop is based on Polymethylsiloxane as working fluid, the<br />
radiator located on the lateral sides of the main cylindrical body<br />
• The primary loop is based on water as working fluid, both lines connected via a heat<br />
exchanger<br />
On the basis of 931W of rejected power and 330W metabolic heat, a radiator size of 8 m 2 is<br />
needed. This is implemented in a cylindrical shape type (eight surfaces of 3.6 m x 0.71 m<br />
length).