ESA Document - Emits - ESA

ESA Document - Emits - ESA ESA Document - Emits - ESA

emits.esa.int
from emits.esa.int More from this publisher
06.02.2013 Views

s 4.4.8 Propulsion HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-20(A) February 2004 page 362 of 422 4.4.8.1 Requirements and design drivers According to mission analysis the total DV required for the deorbiting manoeuvre is estimated to be 98 m/s. Thrust required for this manoeuvre is assumed of 20 kN. This value has been selected by similarity on the basis of the thrust to mass ratio of the Soyuz module. 4.4.8.2 Assumptions and trade-offs Module dry mass is estimated 45 tonnes Only Storable bi-propellant are considered. 4.4.8.3 Baseline design Four YUZHNOYE RD 869 pump-fed thruster have been chosen as propulsion system for this module. The thruster is under development for 4 th stage of the European VEGA Launcher. The propulsion system presents the following characteristics. 4.4.8.4 Budgets Characteristic Value Number of thruster 4 Thrust 5 kN (pump- fed) Isp 325 sec exit diameter 325 mm length 600 mm thruster mass 34 kg propellant UDMH/NTO O/F ratio 2.1 number of tanks 2+2 Tanks material Ti max MEOP 7 bar Mass of UDMH tank 3 kg (each) Mass of NTO tank 2.5 kg (each) Table 4-46: De-orbit propulsion system summary Propellant mass 1463 kg Propulsion Dry mass (including margins) 253 kg This mass includes an estimation of thrusters mass, the tanks, and a roughly estimation of feedlines, valves and regulators, propulsion thermal control, avionics, actuators and does not consider the structure of the propulsion system, power and communication.

s 4.5 Mars Ascent Vehicle 4.5.1 Trajectories HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-20(A) February 2004 page 363 of 422 4.5.1.1 Requirements and design drivers The objective is to obtain an ascent trajectory which minimises the lift off mass, by means of selecting the proper propellant masses in each stage, firing time in each stage, pitch and yaw profile. 4.5.1.2 Baseline trajectory 4.5.1.2.1 Input data Initial conditions The optimal trajectory depends on both the altitude and latitude of the launch pad. The landing site drives the latitude of the launch site, and it was agreed to be 20 degrees North as reference. The reference altitude was assumed to be 0 Km, to be conservative. The longitude was assumed to be equal to 0, since it has no influence in the trajectory computation. Final conditions The final conditions are those corresponding to a circular orbit of 500 km altitude and 32 degrees of inclination. Mass budget Table 4-47 shows the mass budget used for the baseline trajectory. During the optimisation process the mass of the tanks was considered as a variable, being equal to 3% of the propellant mass. Dry Mass (except Tanks) 1st Stage 2nd Stage Tanks Total Dry Mass Prop Dry Mass (except Tanks) Tanks Total Dry Mass Prop Lift Off Mass 700 388 1088 12922 5100 81 5181 2705 21896 Table 4-47: Mass budget in Kg Propulsion system Table 4-48 shows the performance data of the propulsion system and the final propulsion configuration. Type of engine Number of engines Thrust (N) Isp(s) Nozzle Diameter (mm) 1st Stage Aestus (advance) 4 33000 330 1070 2nd Stage RD 869 4 5000 325 375 Drag coefficients and reference area Table 4-48: Propulsion system

s<br />

4.5 Mars Ascent Vehicle<br />

4.5.1 Trajectories<br />

HMM<br />

Assessment Study<br />

Report: CDF-20(A)<br />

February 2004<br />

page 363 of 422<br />

4.5.1.1 Requirements and design drivers<br />

The objective is to obtain an ascent trajectory which minimises the lift off mass, by means of<br />

selecting the proper propellant masses in each stage, firing time in each stage, pitch and yaw<br />

profile.<br />

4.5.1.2 Baseline trajectory<br />

4.5.1.2.1 Input data<br />

Initial conditions<br />

The optimal trajectory depends on both the altitude and latitude of the launch pad. The landing<br />

site drives the latitude of the launch site, and it was agreed to be 20 degrees North as reference.<br />

The reference altitude was assumed to be 0 Km, to be conservative. The longitude was assumed<br />

to be equal to 0, since it has no influence in the trajectory computation.<br />

Final conditions<br />

The final conditions are those corresponding to a circular orbit of 500 km altitude and 32 degrees<br />

of inclination.<br />

Mass budget<br />

Table 4-47 shows the mass budget used for the baseline trajectory. During the optimisation<br />

process the mass of the tanks was considered as a variable, being equal to 3% of the propellant<br />

mass.<br />

Dry Mass<br />

(except Tanks)<br />

1st Stage 2nd Stage<br />

Tanks Total Dry Mass Prop<br />

Dry Mass<br />

(except Tanks)<br />

Tanks Total Dry Mass Prop Lift Off Mass<br />

700 388 1088 12922 5100 81 5181 2705 21896<br />

Table 4-47: Mass budget in Kg<br />

Propulsion system<br />

Table 4-48 shows the performance data of the propulsion system and the final propulsion<br />

configuration.<br />

Type of engine Number of engines Thrust (N) Isp(s) Nozzle Diameter (mm)<br />

1st Stage Aestus (advance) 4 33000 330 1070<br />

2nd Stage RD 869 4 5000 325 375<br />

Drag coefficients and reference area<br />

Table 4-48: Propulsion system

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!