06.02.2013 Views

ESA Document - Emits - ESA

ESA Document - Emits - ESA

ESA Document - Emits - ESA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

s<br />

4.4.5.4 Control laws generation<br />

HMM<br />

Assessment Study<br />

Report: CDF-20(A)<br />

February 2004<br />

page 351 of 422<br />

For the control laws generation a trade-off has been made between two possible alternatives:<br />

Non-Linear Dynamic Inversion and Model-Based Predictive Control.<br />

Non-Linear Dynamic Inversion (NLDI) control techniques uses a model of the plant and the<br />

system dynamics under control. In case of a nonlinear plant, this technique uses a two-controller<br />

level scheme design: a feedback component to linearize the dynamics and a performance<br />

enhancement component of the resulting linear system.<br />

NLDI control technique computes a model of the dynamics of the vehicle during its flight. Then,<br />

it inverts the model to cancel all expected dynamics, and finally it inserts the desired vehicle<br />

response to the resulting plant dynamics.<br />

Model Based Predictive Control (MBPC) involves four control elements that use a linearized<br />

model of the plant under control around a set of well pre-defined trimmed points.<br />

The elements are as follows: a process model (a linearized system model obtained<br />

experimentally off-line), a predictor equation (a forward algorithm which will run for several<br />

steps to predict the behavior of the plant), a known future reference trajectory (previously<br />

obtained by other means and off-line), and a cost function (quadratic cost future process output<br />

error and controls).<br />

For the NLDI solution the controller is able to handle smoothly non-linearities, coupled<br />

aerodynamics effects and other uncertainties like Earth atmospheric and gravity disturbances. By<br />

having a broad model of the plant, NLDI can cover the full flight envelope, eliminating pointper-point<br />

design gain-scheduling. In addition, NLDI can handle a variety of vehicle plants when<br />

design evolves or updates.<br />

On the other hand, for the MBPC solution the controller is able to minimise the number of<br />

constraints when calculating the optimal trajectory and improve the failure forecasting function<br />

in the FDIR (fault detection identification and recovery) subsystem. Assuming a linearized<br />

model of the plant for a pre-defined interval of the flight, the predictor equation is based on the<br />

linearized equations of motion around this steady state flight condition.<br />

The NLDI solution requires an acurate model of the non-linear plan (masses, moments of<br />

inertia,…), and good aerodynamic data bases for all Mach number ranges (extensive wind tunnel<br />

campaigns).<br />

The MBPC solution requires a plant linearization on a wide rage of set points along the nominal<br />

trajectory, and on-line optimisation problem to be solved on-board inside a dedicated processor.<br />

The cost function for the quadratic optimal problem is based on a single criteria (minimum<br />

integral of the heat flux).<br />

The final selection is done for the Non-Linear Dynamic Inversion (NLDI) shown in Figure 4-94.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!