ESA Document - Emits - ESA

ESA Document - Emits - ESA ESA Document - Emits - ESA

emits.esa.int
from emits.esa.int More from this publisher
06.02.2013 Views

s 45˚ 60˚ 70˚ Figure 4-77: IBD shapes Half cone angle 45d 60d 70d Lref m 21.55 33.71 26.7 Sref m2 364.74 892.5 560 Table 4-38: Reference IBD characteristics HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-20(A) February 2004 page 338 of 422 The aerodynamic coefficients were computed with the Newtonian methods and are shown in the Figure 4-78: Figure 4-78: Aerodynamic coefficients comparison The IBD shape selection is based on three coefficients: the drag and the lift coefficients and the reference surface. A drag coefficient and a reference surface should be high enough to reduce the velocity during the entry low enough to open the parachute; a lift coefficient should be enough to reduce the g-load during the entry according to the requirements for a human mission. Another requirement to be taken into account is the stability of the vehicle. The stability can be analysed knowing the distance between the centre of pressure and the centre of gravity. The module which has to be landed is made up from the bottom to the top by the retro-rockets needed to land, the habitation module and the MAV. The centre of gravity of this module is

s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-20(A) February 2004 page 339 of 422 between half and three-quarter of the length from the bottom. Thus the centre of pressure shall be after this point, so the IBD shape should be long enough to fulfil this requirement. 4.4.2.3 Baseline design The baseline for the design is an IBD shape with a 60˚ half cone angle, with a reference diameter of 25m (reference surface of 490m 2 ). This shape was a good compromise between aerodynamic coefficients (drag, lift and L/D) and centre of pressure for the stability. Cd, Cl 1.4 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 Figure 4-79: 60 degrees half cone angle, 25 m Base diameter 0 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Mach number Figure 4-80: Aerodynamic coefficients vs Mach number CD CL L/D 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 L/D

s<br />

45˚ 60˚ 70˚<br />

Figure 4-77: IBD shapes<br />

Half cone angle<br />

45d 60d 70d<br />

Lref m 21.55 33.71 26.7<br />

Sref m2 364.74 892.5 560<br />

Table 4-38: Reference IBD characteristics<br />

HMM<br />

Assessment Study<br />

Report: CDF-20(A)<br />

February 2004<br />

page 338 of 422<br />

The aerodynamic coefficients were computed with the Newtonian methods and are shown in the<br />

Figure 4-78:<br />

Figure 4-78: Aerodynamic coefficients comparison<br />

The IBD shape selection is based on three coefficients: the drag and the lift coefficients and the<br />

reference surface. A drag coefficient and a reference surface should be high enough to reduce the<br />

velocity during the entry low enough to open the parachute; a lift coefficient should be enough to<br />

reduce the g-load during the entry according to the requirements for a human mission.<br />

Another requirement to be taken into account is the stability of the vehicle. The stability can be<br />

analysed knowing the distance between the centre of pressure and the centre of gravity.<br />

The module which has to be landed is made up from the bottom to the top by the retro-rockets<br />

needed to land, the habitation module and the MAV. The centre of gravity of this module is

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!