06.02.2013 Views

ESA Document - Emits - ESA

ESA Document - Emits - ESA

ESA Document - Emits - ESA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

s<br />

HMM<br />

Assessment Study<br />

Report: CDF-20(A)<br />

February 2004<br />

page 336 of 422<br />

The deorbit manoeuvre is at least 96 m/s and increases more than fivefold for a steep entry. This<br />

is an important factor to be taken into account in the final selection of the entry strategy. The<br />

following table lists the minimum and maximum values for all regarded trajectories occurring in<br />

the regarded entry corridor. On the basis of the provided information and taking into account the<br />

results of the aerothermodynamics analysis, this corridor must be narrowed down considerably<br />

and a baseline entry trajectory must be selected to obtain an optimal compromise between<br />

structural and thermal loads, duration, controllability, accuracy and deorbit manoeuvre propellant<br />

requirements.<br />

Based on the current analysis, a target entry angle of -4º appears to constitute an acceptable<br />

compromise but this should be verified.<br />

4.4.1.4 Options<br />

Minimum Maximum<br />

De-orbit burn size [m/s] 96 521<br />

Entry FPA [º] -2 -15<br />

Entry velocity [km/s] 2.990 3.358<br />

Final altitude [km] 13 15<br />

Flight time [s] 227 2450<br />

Max g-load 0.73 4.4<br />

Max dynamic Pressure [Pa] 570 3450<br />

Table 4-37: Summary of Min/Max Characteristics for Regarded Entry Corridor<br />

Different inflatable aeroshell sizes were considered for comparison with the 490.87 m 2 baseline.<br />

A considerably smaller aeroshell reference area size of 300 m 2 is marginally acceptable. It barely<br />

meets the 10 km constraint for attaining parachute deployment velocity. This should be regarded<br />

as the lowest possible value when using inflatable aeroshell technology for the given entry mass<br />

range.<br />

In the course of the CDF study the use of a rigid lifting body with a moderate lift/drag ratio of<br />

0.83 was also considered instead of the inflatable aeroshell with an L/D of about 0.3. The results<br />

are not presented here but further analysis in that direction can be undertaken at a later stage.<br />

4.4.2 Aerothermodynamics<br />

4.4.2.1 Requirements and design drivers<br />

The MEV design was driven by four requirements; the total mass (40 tonnes to 50m tonnes), the<br />

terminal velocity at 2000m of altitude (100m/s) due to the retro-rockets thrust and the design of<br />

the landing vehicle (vertical cylinder with the MAV at the top and retro-rockets at the bottom)<br />

and the g-load during the entry and descent phase.<br />

Trajectories atmospheric entries are functions of parameters as entry conditions (velocity and<br />

flight path angle) and the ballistic coefficients of the vehicle (ratio of the reference surface over<br />

mass and drag coefficient).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!