ESA Document - Emits - ESA
ESA Document - Emits - ESA ESA Document - Emits - ESA
s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-20(A) February 2004 page 310 of 422 Option 2 (high pressure storage) has several advantages: the mass and the volume of the tanks are amazingly high, but also, the transportation of very high pressure tanks located close to the crew is a large risk in case of failure. On the other hand, the use of regenerative system (here performed with solar cells) in the best case cannot be designed with a solar panel smaller than 100 m². Given the difficulties that the astronauts will have to face with the gravity just after the landing, it is not possible to assume a manual deployment of the panels within at least 2 days. Deployment mechanisms have to be mounted on the Habitation Module. These mechanisms are expected to be heavy since they have to cope with the gravity on Martian surface and the huge solar array areas that need to be deployed. In conclusion, the architecture that fits the requirements the best is Option 1: Primary hydrogen/oxygen fuel cells stored in cryogenic tanks. Another benefit of this topology is the possibility to combine the life support oxygen tanks with the ones of the power subsystem. Figure 4-60 shows the mass budget of the selected option. The tank optimal shapes have not been studied. In this budget, they were spherical with diameters of 1.1 m. The oxygen tank includes also the part allocated for life support. The empty water tank is included in the mass budget of the life support subsystem. To avoid the boil-off during the cruise to Mars, a constant power consumption of 1800W is allocated to the thermal regulation of the tanks for the design of the TV. The hydrogen tank mass is computed with the data given in [RD60]. For example, it is assumed that a cryogenic container can store 20 wt.% hydrogen. This value seems optimistic. Other aspects that require closer investigation are: • the estimation of the boil-off • the power estimation of the tanks thermal regulation • the gravimetric capacity of the tanks • the shape of the tanks Element 2: Surface Habitation Module MASS [kg] Unit Element 2 Unit Name Quantity Mass per Maturity Level Margin Total Mass Click on button below to insert new quantity excl. incl. margin unit margin 1 Fuel Cells 1 35.8 To be developed 20 43.0 2 Tank O2 (Spheric) 2 733.1 To be developed 20 1759.4 3 Tank H2 (Spheric) 4 149.4 To be developed 20 717.3 4 PCDU 1 114.8 To be developed 20 137.8 5 Fully developed 5 0.0 - Click on button below to insert new unit To be developed 20 0.0 ELEMENT 2 SUBSYSTEM TOTAL 4 2214.5 20.0 2657.4 4.3.6 Data handling Figure 4-60: Mass budget of Option 1 SHM power subsystem The excursion vehicle’s module integrated avionics shall be seen as a small subset of the one already described for THM.
s 4.3.6.1 Budgets HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-20(A) February 2004 page 311 of 422 The mass and power for the avionics systems can be derived using the same mass/power ratio. The result lead to the following budgets, divided per functional module. Element Mass Surface Habitation Module 40 kg Mars Ascent Vehicle 30 kg Table 4-16: Mass budget The above figures have been derived considering a ‘classical’ approach to the DHS, including all the strictly necessary units. No evaluation for the harness has been made (apart from the usual 4% figure). The current assumption is that the Descent Module is ‘free’ of avionics. As a comparison, the power consumption and mass of the avionics core units in Mars Express configuration are : CDMU : 9.1 kg each, 19W (one active, one cold redundant) RTU : 7.7 kg, 6W AIU : 6.2 kg, 8W SSMM : 8.7 kg, 17W (TBC) Total : 40.8 kg, 50W 4.3.7 Communications 4.3.7.1 Requirements and design drivers • Tracking, Telemetry and Command (TT&C) communications will be supported without any interruption longer than 1 hour. • The maximum range that shall be supported is 1.37 AU and the minimum one 1.1 AU (maximum and minimum Earth / Mars distance respectively during surface operations) • The telecommand (TC) and telemetry (TM) data rates shall be selectable to improve the data rate depending on the distance. • Data rates should be optimised by giving realistic assumption of on-board equipment and ground segment availability. • Data consists of housekeeping, high quality audio and video channels, and any additional data (for example internet access). • Communications during EVAs shall be provided, for simultaneously two astronauts and for a maximum distance of 1 km from SHM. • During EVAs, communications shall be possible even without direct visibility astronaut – SHM. 4.3.7.2 Assumptions and trade-offs 4.3.7.2.1 Communications availability from SHM: relay satellite
- Page 259 and 260: s Figure 4-11: Section through the
- Page 261 and 262: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 263 and 264: s 4.3.1.5 Baseline design HMM Asses
- Page 265 and 266: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 267 and 268: s 4.3.1.5.3 Top level Figure 4-20:
- Page 269 and 270: s 4.3.2.3 Baseline design HMM Asses
- Page 271 and 272: s Schedule in hours for the most ac
- Page 273 and 274: s 4.3.3.6 Waste production HMM Asse
- Page 275 and 276: s Figure 4-26: Total pressure vs. O
- Page 277 and 278: s ECLS system mass: Figure 4-27: Ma
- Page 279 and 280: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 281 and 282: s Figure 4-28: Mars albedo (L), ars
- Page 283 and 284: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 285 and 286: s sun flux (W/m2) 450 400 350 300 2
- Page 287 and 288: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 289 and 290: s Insulation structure (external) F
- Page 291 and 292: s cryocooler heat lift [W] cryocool
- Page 293 and 294: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 295 and 296: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 297 and 298: s • a duty cycle value (duration
- Page 299 and 300: s Figure 4-48: MAV Power Inputs HMM
- Page 301 and 302: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 303 and 304: s 4.3.5.4.2 Power storage HMM Asses
- Page 305 and 306: s Figure 4-52: Regenerative Fuel Ce
- Page 307 and 308: s Figure 4-54: Solar irradiance on
- Page 309: s 450.00 400.00 350.00 300.00 250.0
- Page 313 and 314: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 315 and 316: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 317 and 318: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 319 and 320: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 321 and 322: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 323 and 324: s Surface Surface Container MAV Con
- Page 325 and 326: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 327 and 328: s 4.3.9.3 Baseline design 4.3.9.3.1
- Page 329 and 330: s Bio-Lock Masses: Core Samples No.
- Page 331 and 332: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 333 and 334: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 335 and 336: s Figure 4-72: Entry Velocity (L) a
- Page 337 and 338: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 339 and 340: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 341 and 342: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 343 and 344: s 2 3.9 233 923.1 347 923 12.3 352
- Page 345 and 346: s Figure 4-85: Communications MEV/M
- Page 347 and 348: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 349 and 350: s 4.4.5.3.2 GNC equipment HMM Asses
- Page 351 and 352: s 4.4.5.4 Control laws generation H
- Page 353 and 354: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 355 and 356: s Finally, the Figure 4-97 shown th
- Page 357 and 358: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 359 and 360: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
s<br />
4.3.6.1 Budgets<br />
HMM<br />
Assessment Study<br />
Report: CDF-20(A)<br />
February 2004<br />
page 311 of 422<br />
The mass and power for the avionics systems can be derived using the same mass/power ratio.<br />
The result lead to the following budgets, divided per functional module.<br />
Element Mass<br />
Surface Habitation Module 40 kg<br />
Mars Ascent Vehicle 30 kg<br />
Table 4-16: Mass budget<br />
The above figures have been derived considering a ‘classical’ approach to the DHS, including all<br />
the strictly necessary units. No evaluation for the harness has been made (apart from the usual<br />
4% figure). The current assumption is that the Descent Module is ‘free’ of avionics.<br />
As a comparison, the power consumption and mass of the avionics core units in Mars Express<br />
configuration are :<br />
CDMU : 9.1 kg each, 19W (one active, one cold redundant)<br />
RTU : 7.7 kg, 6W<br />
AIU : 6.2 kg, 8W<br />
SSMM : 8.7 kg, 17W (TBC)<br />
Total : 40.8 kg, 50W<br />
4.3.7 Communications<br />
4.3.7.1 Requirements and design drivers<br />
• Tracking, Telemetry and Command (TT&C) communications will be supported<br />
without any interruption longer than 1 hour.<br />
• The maximum range that shall be supported is 1.37 AU and the minimum one 1.1<br />
AU (maximum and minimum Earth / Mars distance respectively during surface<br />
operations)<br />
• The telecommand (TC) and telemetry (TM) data rates shall be selectable to improve<br />
the data rate depending on the distance.<br />
• Data rates should be optimised by giving realistic assumption of on-board equipment<br />
and ground segment availability.<br />
• Data consists of housekeeping, high quality audio and video channels, and any<br />
additional data (for example internet access).<br />
• Communications during EVAs shall be provided, for simultaneously two astronauts<br />
and for a maximum distance of 1 km from SHM.<br />
• During EVAs, communications shall be possible even without direct visibility<br />
astronaut – SHM.<br />
4.3.7.2 Assumptions and trade-offs<br />
4.3.7.2.1 Communications availability from SHM: relay satellite