ESA Document - Emits - ESA
ESA Document - Emits - ESA ESA Document - Emits - ESA
s 4.3.5.3 Mars environment description Figure 4-49: Power inputs at MEV level HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-20(A) February 2004 page 300 of 422 On Mars, there are specific degradation factors affecting solar energy technology performances (typically solar cells): • Presence of direct but also diffuse light from the atmosphere and suspended dust particles (‘diffusion’) • Scattering of the sunlight spectrum towards the red end, due to suspended dust particles (‘scattering’) • Dust deposition effects on solar array surfaces (‘dust deposition’) Note that diffusion, scattering and dust deposition effects are not constant but vary depending on seasonal and geographical conditions, as well as on the occurrence of large dust storms. In summary, solar cell efficiencies can be broadly affected by the Martian climate changes, and to an extent that can only partially be quantified for the time being. Other important environmental factors are: • Potentially lower operational temperatures than orbital conditions • High-speed winds, but with much lower force than in similar circumstances on Earth, due to the lower ambient pressure (average value is 6.4 mbar compared with Earth average 1013 mbar) • The presence of oxidizing soil characteristics (and potential corrosion of PVAs). For more information on the issues presented above can be found in [RD83] through [RD85]. The source of information for the Sun irradiance at Mars ground level is the Martian Climate database ([RD83]), which provides accurate information relating to the Mars latitude/longitude
s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-20(A) February 2004 page 301 of 422 and the Solar longitude Ls (indicating the Mars seasons: if Ls = 0 represents the spring equinox, then Ls=90 is the summer solstice, Ls=180 the fall equinox and Ls=270 the winter solstice). The selected database option is the Mars Global Surveyor Dust Scenario – January 2001, ‘a best guess’ representing the moderately dusty planet as observed by Mars Global Surveyvor (MGS) without the dust storms. This scenario is recommended for those who seek one annual scenario to represent the Martian mean climate, which is a reference for a moderate opacity of the atmosphere. Figure 4-50: Example of Data (Solar Flux) from the Mars Climate Database 4.3.5.4 Trade-off between technologies for the SHM Several processes to store or to generate energy on the Martian surface may be interesting. A specific chapter deals with the fuel cells since they can be used as power storage, as a power generation device or even more as part of the life support. 4.3.5.4.1 Power generation 4.3.5.4.1.1 Beamed power systems With this concept, the energy is sent by microwaves or lasers from an orbiter to the SHM. The main advantage is a light power collecting system. The disadvantages are: • requirement for a huge antenna on an orbiter • orbiter should have an orbit providing the maximum visibility of the SHM • technology is not proven in space • the Martian dust may significantly affect the performances • risk of depointment of the beam towards the crew This power generation option was therefor rejected. For information, a sizing has been estimated in [RD62].
- Page 249 and 250: s 4 MARS EXCURSION VEHICLE 4.1 Syst
- Page 251 and 252: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 253 and 254: s Figure 4-2: Option 2: Vertical co
- Page 255 and 256: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 257 and 258: s 4.3 Surface habitation module Fig
- Page 259 and 260: s Figure 4-11: Section through the
- Page 261 and 262: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 263 and 264: s 4.3.1.5 Baseline design HMM Asses
- Page 265 and 266: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 267 and 268: s 4.3.1.5.3 Top level Figure 4-20:
- Page 269 and 270: s 4.3.2.3 Baseline design HMM Asses
- Page 271 and 272: s Schedule in hours for the most ac
- Page 273 and 274: s 4.3.3.6 Waste production HMM Asse
- Page 275 and 276: s Figure 4-26: Total pressure vs. O
- Page 277 and 278: s ECLS system mass: Figure 4-27: Ma
- Page 279 and 280: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 281 and 282: s Figure 4-28: Mars albedo (L), ars
- Page 283 and 284: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 285 and 286: s sun flux (W/m2) 450 400 350 300 2
- Page 287 and 288: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 289 and 290: s Insulation structure (external) F
- Page 291 and 292: s cryocooler heat lift [W] cryocool
- Page 293 and 294: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 295 and 296: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 297 and 298: s • a duty cycle value (duration
- Page 299: s Figure 4-48: MAV Power Inputs HMM
- Page 303 and 304: s 4.3.5.4.2 Power storage HMM Asses
- Page 305 and 306: s Figure 4-52: Regenerative Fuel Ce
- Page 307 and 308: s Figure 4-54: Solar irradiance on
- Page 309 and 310: s 450.00 400.00 350.00 300.00 250.0
- Page 311 and 312: s 4.3.6.1 Budgets HMM Assessment St
- Page 313 and 314: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 315 and 316: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 317 and 318: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 319 and 320: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 321 and 322: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 323 and 324: s Surface Surface Container MAV Con
- Page 325 and 326: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 327 and 328: s 4.3.9.3 Baseline design 4.3.9.3.1
- Page 329 and 330: s Bio-Lock Masses: Core Samples No.
- Page 331 and 332: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 333 and 334: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 335 and 336: s Figure 4-72: Entry Velocity (L) a
- Page 337 and 338: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 339 and 340: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 341 and 342: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 343 and 344: s 2 3.9 233 923.1 347 923 12.3 352
- Page 345 and 346: s Figure 4-85: Communications MEV/M
- Page 347 and 348: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 349 and 350: s 4.4.5.3.2 GNC equipment HMM Asses
s<br />
4.3.5.3 Mars environment description<br />
Figure 4-49: Power inputs at MEV level<br />
HMM<br />
Assessment Study<br />
Report: CDF-20(A)<br />
February 2004<br />
page 300 of 422<br />
On Mars, there are specific degradation factors affecting solar energy technology performances<br />
(typically solar cells):<br />
• Presence of direct but also diffuse light from the atmosphere and suspended dust particles<br />
(‘diffusion’)<br />
• Scattering of the sunlight spectrum towards the red end, due to suspended dust particles<br />
(‘scattering’)<br />
• Dust deposition effects on solar array surfaces (‘dust deposition’)<br />
Note that diffusion, scattering and dust deposition effects are not constant but vary depending on<br />
seasonal and geographical conditions, as well as on the occurrence of large dust storms.<br />
In summary, solar cell efficiencies can be broadly affected by the Martian climate changes, and<br />
to an extent that can only partially be quantified for the time being.<br />
Other important environmental factors are:<br />
• Potentially lower operational temperatures than orbital conditions<br />
• High-speed winds, but with much lower force than in similar circumstances on Earth, due<br />
to the lower ambient pressure (average value is 6.4 mbar compared with Earth average<br />
1013 mbar)<br />
• The presence of oxidizing soil characteristics (and potential corrosion of PVAs).<br />
For more information on the issues presented above can be found in [RD83] through [RD85].<br />
The source of information for the Sun irradiance at Mars ground level is the Martian Climate<br />
database ([RD83]), which provides accurate information relating to the Mars latitude/longitude