ESA Document - Emits - ESA

ESA Document - Emits - ESA ESA Document - Emits - ESA

emits.esa.int
from emits.esa.int More from this publisher
06.02.2013 Views

s Oxygen tank (fuel cells): (x 2) Cryo systems HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-20(A) February 2004 page 294 of 422 per tank, two coolers, each 8.3 kg (7 kg compressor, 1.3 kg displacer), consumption 37W each MLI: 4.6 kg for each tank Table 4-14: Synthesis per subsystem 4.3.4.4.2 Overall budget (as introduced to the system) 4.3.5 Power 4.3.5.1 Design drivers Table 4-15: Overall budget The environment encountered by the MEV and the specific requirements are completely new for a space power design. Therefore, the completion of this power subsystem is one of the most challenging power designs of the coming 20 years. Until now, except nuclear technologies, power storage and generation were only performed on space applications by: solar cells, batteries (primary or secondary) or fuel cells. More extended technologies for power storage and generation have to be considered. The Martian environment is hostile for power system for several reasons: dust deposit, daily temperature cycling, diffusion and scattering of the sunlight, high-speed winds, presence of oxidizing soil characteristics, dust storms, roughness and relief of the landing spot, low solar irradiance and long eclipse durations. Several studies dealing with a large range of possible technologies candidates have already been performed (See [RD4],[RD5],[RD60],[RD62],[RD64],[RD65]…). The conclusions vary from stray to another. An important rationale is the fact that the technologies shall be available and qualified only for 2015. Hence, designs that are nowadays still at experimental or even conceptual level are also considered. Moreover, the expected efficiency increase of the qualified technologies during the following 10 years can also differ. This study therefore focuses on: • the qualified/existing technologies: on the ESA development programmes plan • other technologies at the current level of confidence

s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-20(A) February 2004 page 295 of 422 Consequently, although the final design presented in the report will maybe not be the one with the best performances in 2015, but is one of the most reliable with the current state of art without having a too conservative approach. A first trade-off between the main promising candidates was performed before starting the design itself of the subsystem. Nuclear energy has been excluded from this study. 4.3.5.2 Requirements 4.3.5.2.1 Mission requirements During the cruise from Earth to Mars, the power required for the MEV (thermal regulation, check-ups…) is supplied by the power system of the TV. The MEV needs to have an autonomous power system from the separation from the TV, during the descent phase, during the surface operations, and during the launch from Mars until the rendezvous with the TV. The mission has therefore been divided into the following modes: • Descent phase (duration estimated: 30 minutes) • Surface operations (distinction between night and day power consumptions) • Ascent phase (max 90 minutes) • Parking orbit (orbit duration: 118 minutes) for several days • Rendezvous and docking (maximum 30 minutes) • MAV Orbital Safe Mode The surface operations duration is 37 days long in the contingency case. The possible landing sites to take into account are in the latitude range [20ºN, 20ºS]. During all the phases, power has to be supplied to the different subsystems. The Figure 4-45 shows the different modes of the mission. The time durations correspond to the reference time considered for the power design.

s<br />

Oxygen tank (fuel<br />

cells): (x 2)<br />

Cryo systems<br />

HMM<br />

Assessment Study<br />

Report: CDF-20(A)<br />

February 2004<br />

page 294 of 422<br />

per tank, two coolers, each 8.3 kg (7 kg compressor, 1.3 kg displacer), consumption 37W<br />

each<br />

MLI: 4.6 kg for each tank<br />

Table 4-14: Synthesis per subsystem<br />

4.3.4.4.2 Overall budget (as introduced to the system)<br />

4.3.5 Power<br />

4.3.5.1 Design drivers<br />

Table 4-15: Overall budget<br />

The environment encountered by the MEV and the specific requirements are completely new for<br />

a space power design. Therefore, the completion of this power subsystem is one of the most<br />

challenging power designs of the coming 20 years. Until now, except nuclear technologies,<br />

power storage and generation were only performed on space applications by: solar cells, batteries<br />

(primary or secondary) or fuel cells. More extended technologies for power storage and<br />

generation have to be considered.<br />

The Martian environment is hostile for power system for several reasons: dust deposit, daily<br />

temperature cycling, diffusion and scattering of the sunlight, high-speed winds, presence of<br />

oxidizing soil characteristics, dust storms, roughness and relief of the landing spot, low solar<br />

irradiance and long eclipse durations.<br />

Several studies dealing with a large range of possible technologies candidates have already been<br />

performed (See [RD4],[RD5],[RD60],[RD62],[RD64],[RD65]…). The conclusions vary from<br />

stray to another.<br />

An important rationale is the fact that the technologies shall be available and qualified only for<br />

2015. Hence, designs that are nowadays still at experimental or even conceptual level are also<br />

considered. Moreover, the expected efficiency increase of the qualified technologies during the<br />

following 10 years can also differ.<br />

This study therefore focuses on:<br />

• the qualified/existing technologies: on the <strong>ESA</strong> development programmes plan<br />

• other technologies at the current level of confidence

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!