ESA Document - Emits - ESA
ESA Document - Emits - ESA ESA Document - Emits - ESA
s Oxygen tank (fuel cells): (x 2) Cryo systems HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-20(A) February 2004 page 294 of 422 per tank, two coolers, each 8.3 kg (7 kg compressor, 1.3 kg displacer), consumption 37W each MLI: 4.6 kg for each tank Table 4-14: Synthesis per subsystem 4.3.4.4.2 Overall budget (as introduced to the system) 4.3.5 Power 4.3.5.1 Design drivers Table 4-15: Overall budget The environment encountered by the MEV and the specific requirements are completely new for a space power design. Therefore, the completion of this power subsystem is one of the most challenging power designs of the coming 20 years. Until now, except nuclear technologies, power storage and generation were only performed on space applications by: solar cells, batteries (primary or secondary) or fuel cells. More extended technologies for power storage and generation have to be considered. The Martian environment is hostile for power system for several reasons: dust deposit, daily temperature cycling, diffusion and scattering of the sunlight, high-speed winds, presence of oxidizing soil characteristics, dust storms, roughness and relief of the landing spot, low solar irradiance and long eclipse durations. Several studies dealing with a large range of possible technologies candidates have already been performed (See [RD4],[RD5],[RD60],[RD62],[RD64],[RD65]…). The conclusions vary from stray to another. An important rationale is the fact that the technologies shall be available and qualified only for 2015. Hence, designs that are nowadays still at experimental or even conceptual level are also considered. Moreover, the expected efficiency increase of the qualified technologies during the following 10 years can also differ. This study therefore focuses on: • the qualified/existing technologies: on the ESA development programmes plan • other technologies at the current level of confidence
s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-20(A) February 2004 page 295 of 422 Consequently, although the final design presented in the report will maybe not be the one with the best performances in 2015, but is one of the most reliable with the current state of art without having a too conservative approach. A first trade-off between the main promising candidates was performed before starting the design itself of the subsystem. Nuclear energy has been excluded from this study. 4.3.5.2 Requirements 4.3.5.2.1 Mission requirements During the cruise from Earth to Mars, the power required for the MEV (thermal regulation, check-ups…) is supplied by the power system of the TV. The MEV needs to have an autonomous power system from the separation from the TV, during the descent phase, during the surface operations, and during the launch from Mars until the rendezvous with the TV. The mission has therefore been divided into the following modes: • Descent phase (duration estimated: 30 minutes) • Surface operations (distinction between night and day power consumptions) • Ascent phase (max 90 minutes) • Parking orbit (orbit duration: 118 minutes) for several days • Rendezvous and docking (maximum 30 minutes) • MAV Orbital Safe Mode The surface operations duration is 37 days long in the contingency case. The possible landing sites to take into account are in the latitude range [20ºN, 20ºS]. During all the phases, power has to be supplied to the different subsystems. The Figure 4-45 shows the different modes of the mission. The time durations correspond to the reference time considered for the power design.
- Page 243 and 244: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 245 and 246: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 247 and 248: s 3.4.4 Mechanisms HMM Assessment S
- Page 249 and 250: s 4 MARS EXCURSION VEHICLE 4.1 Syst
- Page 251 and 252: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 253 and 254: s Figure 4-2: Option 2: Vertical co
- Page 255 and 256: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 257 and 258: s 4.3 Surface habitation module Fig
- Page 259 and 260: s Figure 4-11: Section through the
- Page 261 and 262: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 263 and 264: s 4.3.1.5 Baseline design HMM Asses
- Page 265 and 266: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 267 and 268: s 4.3.1.5.3 Top level Figure 4-20:
- Page 269 and 270: s 4.3.2.3 Baseline design HMM Asses
- Page 271 and 272: s Schedule in hours for the most ac
- Page 273 and 274: s 4.3.3.6 Waste production HMM Asse
- Page 275 and 276: s Figure 4-26: Total pressure vs. O
- Page 277 and 278: s ECLS system mass: Figure 4-27: Ma
- Page 279 and 280: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 281 and 282: s Figure 4-28: Mars albedo (L), ars
- Page 283 and 284: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 285 and 286: s sun flux (W/m2) 450 400 350 300 2
- Page 287 and 288: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 289 and 290: s Insulation structure (external) F
- Page 291 and 292: s cryocooler heat lift [W] cryocool
- Page 293: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 297 and 298: s • a duty cycle value (duration
- Page 299 and 300: s Figure 4-48: MAV Power Inputs HMM
- Page 301 and 302: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 303 and 304: s 4.3.5.4.2 Power storage HMM Asses
- Page 305 and 306: s Figure 4-52: Regenerative Fuel Ce
- Page 307 and 308: s Figure 4-54: Solar irradiance on
- Page 309 and 310: s 450.00 400.00 350.00 300.00 250.0
- Page 311 and 312: s 4.3.6.1 Budgets HMM Assessment St
- Page 313 and 314: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 315 and 316: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 317 and 318: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 319 and 320: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 321 and 322: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 323 and 324: s Surface Surface Container MAV Con
- Page 325 and 326: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 327 and 328: s 4.3.9.3 Baseline design 4.3.9.3.1
- Page 329 and 330: s Bio-Lock Masses: Core Samples No.
- Page 331 and 332: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 333 and 334: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 335 and 336: s Figure 4-72: Entry Velocity (L) a
- Page 337 and 338: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 339 and 340: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 341 and 342: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 343 and 344: s 2 3.9 233 923.1 347 923 12.3 352
s<br />
Oxygen tank (fuel<br />
cells): (x 2)<br />
Cryo systems<br />
HMM<br />
Assessment Study<br />
Report: CDF-20(A)<br />
February 2004<br />
page 294 of 422<br />
per tank, two coolers, each 8.3 kg (7 kg compressor, 1.3 kg displacer), consumption 37W<br />
each<br />
MLI: 4.6 kg for each tank<br />
Table 4-14: Synthesis per subsystem<br />
4.3.4.4.2 Overall budget (as introduced to the system)<br />
4.3.5 Power<br />
4.3.5.1 Design drivers<br />
Table 4-15: Overall budget<br />
The environment encountered by the MEV and the specific requirements are completely new for<br />
a space power design. Therefore, the completion of this power subsystem is one of the most<br />
challenging power designs of the coming 20 years. Until now, except nuclear technologies,<br />
power storage and generation were only performed on space applications by: solar cells, batteries<br />
(primary or secondary) or fuel cells. More extended technologies for power storage and<br />
generation have to be considered.<br />
The Martian environment is hostile for power system for several reasons: dust deposit, daily<br />
temperature cycling, diffusion and scattering of the sunlight, high-speed winds, presence of<br />
oxidizing soil characteristics, dust storms, roughness and relief of the landing spot, low solar<br />
irradiance and long eclipse durations.<br />
Several studies dealing with a large range of possible technologies candidates have already been<br />
performed (See [RD4],[RD5],[RD60],[RD62],[RD64],[RD65]…). The conclusions vary from<br />
stray to another.<br />
An important rationale is the fact that the technologies shall be available and qualified only for<br />
2015. Hence, designs that are nowadays still at experimental or even conceptual level are also<br />
considered. Moreover, the expected efficiency increase of the qualified technologies during the<br />
following 10 years can also differ.<br />
This study therefore focuses on:<br />
• the qualified/existing technologies: on the <strong>ESA</strong> development programmes plan<br />
• other technologies at the current level of confidence