ESA Document - Emits - ESA
ESA Document - Emits - ESA ESA Document - Emits - ESA
s 4.3.4.3.2 Primary loop air 630 m3/hr at 27C max 12.3 kW mean + 660W metabolic cold plates assembly liquid/air HX N acquisition system Figure 4-35: SHM radiator and location to MAV thermal bus (secondary loop) 13/18 C liquid/liquid HX thermostatic coils (hull, propulsion, ...) 0 W worst case 1/6 C where high plume density, local protection with titanium foils (lateral, bottom) N 950 kg/hr at 3.5b, 18C pump assembly accumulator Figure 4-36: Surface Habitation Module / primary loop principles 4.3.4.3.3 The insulating system and thermal protection Ascent vehicle primary loop HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-20(A) February 2004 page 286 of 422 The thermal design for landed vehicles differs considerably from other space applications in that Mars has an atmosphere (7 mb), which plays an important role in the thermal insulation. The choice of insulation and structures must be traded off against each other. The vacuum compatible foams such as Basotect and Rohacell not only have different thermal properties but also are structurally different. Rohacell (a closed-cell rigid foam plastic) is stiff, impact resistant and self-supporting, whereas Basotect (an open-cell foam), a better insulator, is fibrous and lacks any structural integrity. Used on the Pathfinder and MER rovers, Aerogel (Silica gel with carbon black) is an excellent thermal insulator, but has no structural integrity. The different thermal conductivities are shown in Figure 4-37.
s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-20(A) February 2004 page 287 of 422 Figure 4-37: CLRC Beagle2 study (L), Aerogel thermal conductivity versus pressure (R) The low density of Aerogel combined with its good thermal insulation makes it an ideal candidate but would need an encapsulation (honeycomb cells for example). If a monolithic structure (aluminium) is retained, insulation materials can be added in a multi-layer design combining radiative (goldenized layer) to conductive insulation (foams). The double requirement to perform in vacuum and in pressurised environment can be answered by installing different type of foams (closed cell inside, open cell outside). goldised foil betacloth int. foam structure ext. foam Figure 4-38: Insulation layout The choice of external layer results as a compromise between the different constraints brought by the Martian and vacuum environment. The principle of a cold radiative skin completed by heat input when necessary is preferred for its simplicity, providing the existing resources of energy (released heat from units and metabolic). Betacloth is retained as the external layer of the SHM to avoid undesirable heating from the Sun during the transfer phase. Its high emittance (high energy exchanged during nights) is somewhat counterbalanced by the high thermal inertia of the vehicle. Its strength is also seen as an advantage. 4.3.4.3.4 The thermostatic system Certain surfaces that cannot be protected by insulating means (interface between MAV and ascent vehicle) are treated (oxidation anodic, alodine) to minimise heat transfer. On the internal face, coils (circulating fluid from primary loop) thermostatically control the temperature (condensation avoidance) and the heat exchanges (control of the heat losses). An adequate redistribution of the rejected heat (thermostatic coils) therefore reduces the use of heater power to the minimum. When not directly accessible to fluid lines, externally mounted elements will require the use of strip heaters combined to an adequate insulation.
- Page 235 and 236: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 237 and 238: s Item Nr. Mass [kg] Margin [%] Mas
- Page 239 and 240: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 241 and 242: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 243 and 244: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 245 and 246: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 247 and 248: s 3.4.4 Mechanisms HMM Assessment S
- Page 249 and 250: s 4 MARS EXCURSION VEHICLE 4.1 Syst
- Page 251 and 252: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 253 and 254: s Figure 4-2: Option 2: Vertical co
- Page 255 and 256: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 257 and 258: s 4.3 Surface habitation module Fig
- Page 259 and 260: s Figure 4-11: Section through the
- Page 261 and 262: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 263 and 264: s 4.3.1.5 Baseline design HMM Asses
- Page 265 and 266: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 267 and 268: s 4.3.1.5.3 Top level Figure 4-20:
- Page 269 and 270: s 4.3.2.3 Baseline design HMM Asses
- Page 271 and 272: s Schedule in hours for the most ac
- Page 273 and 274: s 4.3.3.6 Waste production HMM Asse
- Page 275 and 276: s Figure 4-26: Total pressure vs. O
- Page 277 and 278: s ECLS system mass: Figure 4-27: Ma
- Page 279 and 280: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 281 and 282: s Figure 4-28: Mars albedo (L), ars
- Page 283 and 284: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 285: s sun flux (W/m2) 450 400 350 300 2
- Page 289 and 290: s Insulation structure (external) F
- Page 291 and 292: s cryocooler heat lift [W] cryocool
- Page 293 and 294: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 295 and 296: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 297 and 298: s • a duty cycle value (duration
- Page 299 and 300: s Figure 4-48: MAV Power Inputs HMM
- Page 301 and 302: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 303 and 304: s 4.3.5.4.2 Power storage HMM Asses
- Page 305 and 306: s Figure 4-52: Regenerative Fuel Ce
- Page 307 and 308: s Figure 4-54: Solar irradiance on
- Page 309 and 310: s 450.00 400.00 350.00 300.00 250.0
- Page 311 and 312: s 4.3.6.1 Budgets HMM Assessment St
- Page 313 and 314: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 315 and 316: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 317 and 318: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 319 and 320: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 321 and 322: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 323 and 324: s Surface Surface Container MAV Con
- Page 325 and 326: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 327 and 328: s 4.3.9.3 Baseline design 4.3.9.3.1
- Page 329 and 330: s Bio-Lock Masses: Core Samples No.
- Page 331 and 332: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 333 and 334: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 335 and 336: s Figure 4-72: Entry Velocity (L) a
s<br />
4.3.4.3.2 Primary loop<br />
air 630 m3/hr<br />
at 27C max<br />
12.3 kW mean + 660W metabolic<br />
cold plates<br />
assembly<br />
liquid/air HX<br />
N<br />
acquisition system<br />
Figure 4-35: SHM radiator and location<br />
to MAV thermal bus<br />
(secondary loop)<br />
13/18 C<br />
liquid/liquid HX<br />
thermostatic coils<br />
(hull, propulsion, ...)<br />
0 W worst case<br />
1/6 C<br />
where high plume density, local protection<br />
with titanium foils (lateral, bottom)<br />
N<br />
950 kg/hr<br />
at 3.5b, 18C<br />
pump assembly<br />
accumulator<br />
Figure 4-36: Surface Habitation Module / primary loop principles<br />
4.3.4.3.3 The insulating system and thermal protection<br />
Ascent vehicle<br />
primary loop<br />
HMM<br />
Assessment Study<br />
Report: CDF-20(A)<br />
February 2004<br />
page 286 of 422<br />
The thermal design for landed vehicles differs considerably from other space applications in that<br />
Mars has an atmosphere (7 mb), which plays an important role in the thermal insulation.<br />
The choice of insulation and structures must be traded off against each other. The vacuum<br />
compatible foams such as Basotect and Rohacell not only have different thermal properties but<br />
also are structurally different. Rohacell (a closed-cell rigid foam plastic) is stiff, impact resistant<br />
and self-supporting, whereas Basotect (an open-cell foam), a better insulator, is fibrous and lacks<br />
any structural integrity.<br />
Used on the Pathfinder and MER rovers, Aerogel (Silica gel with carbon black) is an excellent<br />
thermal insulator, but has no structural integrity. The different thermal conductivities are shown<br />
in Figure 4-37.