06.02.2013 Views

ESA Document - Emits - ESA

ESA Document - Emits - ESA

ESA Document - Emits - ESA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

s<br />

HMM<br />

Assessment Study<br />

Report: CDF-20(A)<br />

February 2004<br />

page 274 of 422<br />

Figure 4-25 illustrates the anticipated time of 6 h EVAs. Given that EVAs are scheduled for<br />

every two days, the minimal time between two scheduled EVAs is 42 h. This time is greater than<br />

the 36 h for which flight protocols exist today. Therefore, as a first cornerstone, the study<br />

assumed that such protocols are valid for mission to Mars. This implies using current technology<br />

and knowledge to assess the needs and issues concerning Martian EVAs.<br />

4.3.3.8 Atmospheric composition<br />

Different aspects drive the atmospheric composition selection. To schedule flexible EVAs and<br />

have the fastest contingency EVA capabilities, the SHM and MAV could use a 100% oxygen<br />

atmosphere at non-toxic pressure. However, an oxygen-rich atmosphere increases the risk of fire,<br />

poses constraints on the material selection and engineering of the MEV, and perhaps an over<br />

pressurisation during reentry and ascent will be necessary. A standard composition atmosphere<br />

of 101.3 kPa would allow flexible on-ground testing and references. Conversely, it would<br />

increase the required pre-breathing time rendering the schedule less flexible and increases the air<br />

losses.<br />

Given a standard atmosphere (101.3 kPa, 21% O 2 ), the pre-breathing time would range between<br />

30 min (Russian protocol, TR=1.8, suit pressure 39.2 kPa) and 4.5 h (American protocol,<br />

TR=1.6, suit pressure 29.6 kPa). However, both protocols assume the possibility to return to<br />

Earth quickly to treat an astronaut if symptoms of decompression sickness (DCS) occur. Such<br />

options will not exist for a mission to Mars. Therefore, more conservative pre-breathing time<br />

estimates must be considered, which would cause a significant increase in EVA preparation time.<br />

However, the scheduled activities for an astronaut on an EVA day would exceed 11 h so there<br />

would be no advantage.<br />

Therefore, additional atmosphere compositions have been investigated that depend on the<br />

allowable tissue ratio. The results are shown in Table 4-6 and are valid for a 26 kPa suit pressure.<br />

TR=1.6 TR=1.4 TR=1.2<br />

101.3kPa, 21Vol% O2 284 341 408<br />

70.14kPa, 26.5Vol% O2 95 153 219<br />

50kPa, 50Vol% O2 0 0 0<br />

28kPa, 100Vol% O2 0 0 0<br />

(suit pressure 26 kPa, 100% oxygen, half time constant 300min)<br />

Table 4-6: Pre-breathing time as a function of suit internal pressure (min)<br />

As shown, an atmosphere composition of 50% nitrogen and 50% oxygen at 50 kPa total pressure<br />

would be a suitable compromise, as it seems to avoid pre-breathing and still provide some<br />

marginal fire hazard reduction. NASA STD 3000 reports that the fire hazard is reduced by 50%<br />

in comparison to a 100% oxygen atmosphere yet still poses an increased fire hazard. As Figure<br />

4-26 shows, the composition is within the zone of unimpaired performance of the astronauts.<br />

Discussions with medical personnel indicated that short and long-term health concerns for the<br />

crew due to the exposure to this atmosphere are not expected.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!