ESA Document - Emits - ESA
ESA Document - Emits - ESA ESA Document - Emits - ESA
s Figure 4-15: Plan of lower level, upper level and mid level, respectively, from left to right HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-20(A) February 2004 page 262 of 422 Figure 4-15 shows the different levels with their functional layout. On the bottom left is the lowest level showing how the workstation, the sample exchange box, the toolboxes and the EVA suits docked to the SHM are integrated. In the middle right is the social level indicating the relation of the window and the table, the galley and the circulation, the hygiene facilities and the stairs coming up from the EVA deck. This design approach was finally chosen because the heaviest part is at the bottom of the habitat and the spatial design has the most advantages and different layers of perception and habitability which makes the habitat user friendly. Also through the whole process of different options this one developed integrating all the advantages and important factors, which have been investigated earlier. 4.3.1.4 General safety issues The following general safety issues have been taken into consideration: • 20% of the volume has to be dedicated to ducts and pipes – this volume might be added with easy access to all ducts and pipes for maintenance • Enough fire detectors and isolation and recovery systems should be provided to enhance the safety of the crew • The LSS of the MAV should function independently from the SHM there must be two air-tight compartments: 1. MAV 2. SHM
s 4.3.1.5 Baseline design HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-20(A) February 2004 page 263 of 422 With the previous proposal taken further in its conceptual detail, this baseline design was developed. Zoning of the SHM is defined by functions such as working, EVA, private areas (marked orange) and achieved by spatial planning. The LSS is placed at the bottom of the SHM, allowing free translation throughout the habitat. Figure 4-16 shows a large axonometric view of the habitat, which gives an overview of the SHM configuration. Figure 4-16: Axonometric of the final design status
- Page 211 and 212: s 70-m antenna 70-m antenna 3.3.7.5
- Page 213 and 214: s Angular separation SEM > 10º SEM
- Page 215 and 216: s Figure 3-63: Communications MEV/M
- Page 217 and 218: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 219 and 220: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 221 and 222: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 223 and 224: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 225 and 226: s Element 1: Transfer Habitation Mo
- Page 227 and 228: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 229 and 230: s Radiation Shielding Shielding Req
- Page 231 and 232: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 233 and 234: s The propulsion system and its cha
- Page 235 and 236: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 237 and 238: s Item Nr. Mass [kg] Margin [%] Mas
- Page 239 and 240: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 241 and 242: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 243 and 244: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 245 and 246: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 247 and 248: s 3.4.4 Mechanisms HMM Assessment S
- Page 249 and 250: s 4 MARS EXCURSION VEHICLE 4.1 Syst
- Page 251 and 252: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 253 and 254: s Figure 4-2: Option 2: Vertical co
- Page 255 and 256: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 257 and 258: s 4.3 Surface habitation module Fig
- Page 259 and 260: s Figure 4-11: Section through the
- Page 261: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 265 and 266: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 267 and 268: s 4.3.1.5.3 Top level Figure 4-20:
- Page 269 and 270: s 4.3.2.3 Baseline design HMM Asses
- Page 271 and 272: s Schedule in hours for the most ac
- Page 273 and 274: s 4.3.3.6 Waste production HMM Asse
- Page 275 and 276: s Figure 4-26: Total pressure vs. O
- Page 277 and 278: s ECLS system mass: Figure 4-27: Ma
- Page 279 and 280: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 281 and 282: s Figure 4-28: Mars albedo (L), ars
- Page 283 and 284: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 285 and 286: s sun flux (W/m2) 450 400 350 300 2
- Page 287 and 288: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 289 and 290: s Insulation structure (external) F
- Page 291 and 292: s cryocooler heat lift [W] cryocool
- Page 293 and 294: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 295 and 296: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 297 and 298: s • a duty cycle value (duration
- Page 299 and 300: s Figure 4-48: MAV Power Inputs HMM
- Page 301 and 302: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 303 and 304: s 4.3.5.4.2 Power storage HMM Asses
- Page 305 and 306: s Figure 4-52: Regenerative Fuel Ce
- Page 307 and 308: s Figure 4-54: Solar irradiance on
- Page 309 and 310: s 450.00 400.00 350.00 300.00 250.0
- Page 311 and 312: s 4.3.6.1 Budgets HMM Assessment St
s<br />
4.3.1.5 Baseline design<br />
HMM<br />
Assessment Study<br />
Report: CDF-20(A)<br />
February 2004<br />
page 263 of 422<br />
With the previous proposal taken further in its conceptual detail, this baseline design was<br />
developed. Zoning of the SHM is defined by functions such as working, EVA, private areas<br />
(marked orange) and achieved by spatial planning. The LSS is placed at the bottom of the SHM,<br />
allowing free translation throughout the habitat. Figure 4-16 shows a large axonometric view of<br />
the habitat, which gives an overview of the SHM configuration.<br />
Figure 4-16: Axonometric of the final design status
Change language