ESA Document - Emits - ESA
ESA Document - Emits - ESA ESA Document - Emits - ESA
s 4.2.5 Mars ascent vehicle HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-20(A) February 2004 page 256 of 422 In Figure 4-7 the complete MAV is shown. It is composed of a capsule (see Figure 4-8) and two propulsion stages. In Figure 4-9 the MEV is shown after the first propulsion stage is jettisoned. In Table 4-4 the pressurised volume of the capsule is presented. Figure 4-7: Mars ascent vehicle Figure 4-8: Capsule of the MAV with the conical interface to surface habitation module Length Internal Diameter Volume [mm] [mm] [m 3 ] Cylinder 1800 2700 10.3 Lower Closure 1000 3.5 Upper Closure 150 0.8 Total Pressurised Volume 14.6 Table 4-4: Dimensions and volume capsule
s 4.3 Surface habitation module Figure 4-9: Mars excursion vehicle; Capsule with its second stage HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-20(A) February 2004 page 257 of 422 4.3.1 Internal configuration The development of the baseline design for the SHM included an investigation on the usage of inflatable technologies. Before the final baseline design, three main steps (including eight different designs and configurations) were developed followed by two detailed designs of different interior layouts for the three main zones: the private, the personal and the social zone. (See THM internal configuration for definitions 3.3.1) 4.3.1.1 Preparing the baseline design – investigations of SHM’s interior configuration The final diameter for the SHM is 3.60 m, derived from the limitations of the launch vehicle /diameter of 6.00 m) and the safety distance required between the plume of the MAV during take-off and the ground or the habitat. Where and how to place the life support system optimally still remains an open issue. Three options were considered: at the top level of the habitat, in the middle, and at the bottom. The option with the LSS at the top level was discarded, because the mass of the LSS would have been too high up, considering the fact that the MAV with the propulsion tanks already has a substantially high weight within the overall MEV configuration. Prior to a final conclusion, the following two options were developed: 4.3.1.2 Option 1 – LSS in the middle of the habitat SHM - cylinder: Height: 7.00 m Diameter: 3.60 m LSS: 10 m 3 in the middle of the habitat
- Page 205 and 206: s 3.3.6.2 Baseline design HMM Asses
- Page 207 and 208: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 209 and 210: s 5 Reduce 2dB pointing precision t
- Page 211 and 212: s 70-m antenna 70-m antenna 3.3.7.5
- Page 213 and 214: s Angular separation SEM > 10º SEM
- Page 215 and 216: s Figure 3-63: Communications MEV/M
- Page 217 and 218: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 219 and 220: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 221 and 222: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 223 and 224: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 225 and 226: s Element 1: Transfer Habitation Mo
- Page 227 and 228: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 229 and 230: s Radiation Shielding Shielding Req
- Page 231 and 232: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 233 and 234: s The propulsion system and its cha
- Page 235 and 236: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 237 and 238: s Item Nr. Mass [kg] Margin [%] Mas
- Page 239 and 240: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 241 and 242: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 243 and 244: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 245 and 246: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 247 and 248: s 3.4.4 Mechanisms HMM Assessment S
- Page 249 and 250: s 4 MARS EXCURSION VEHICLE 4.1 Syst
- Page 251 and 252: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 253 and 254: s Figure 4-2: Option 2: Vertical co
- Page 255: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 259 and 260: s Figure 4-11: Section through the
- Page 261 and 262: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 263 and 264: s 4.3.1.5 Baseline design HMM Asses
- Page 265 and 266: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 267 and 268: s 4.3.1.5.3 Top level Figure 4-20:
- Page 269 and 270: s 4.3.2.3 Baseline design HMM Asses
- Page 271 and 272: s Schedule in hours for the most ac
- Page 273 and 274: s 4.3.3.6 Waste production HMM Asse
- Page 275 and 276: s Figure 4-26: Total pressure vs. O
- Page 277 and 278: s ECLS system mass: Figure 4-27: Ma
- Page 279 and 280: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 281 and 282: s Figure 4-28: Mars albedo (L), ars
- Page 283 and 284: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 285 and 286: s sun flux (W/m2) 450 400 350 300 2
- Page 287 and 288: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 289 and 290: s Insulation structure (external) F
- Page 291 and 292: s cryocooler heat lift [W] cryocool
- Page 293 and 294: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 295 and 296: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 297 and 298: s • a duty cycle value (duration
- Page 299 and 300: s Figure 4-48: MAV Power Inputs HMM
- Page 301 and 302: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 303 and 304: s 4.3.5.4.2 Power storage HMM Asses
- Page 305 and 306: s Figure 4-52: Regenerative Fuel Ce
s<br />
4.3 Surface habitation module<br />
Figure 4-9: Mars excursion vehicle; Capsule with its second stage<br />
HMM<br />
Assessment Study<br />
Report: CDF-20(A)<br />
February 2004<br />
page 257 of 422<br />
4.3.1 Internal configuration<br />
The development of the baseline design for the SHM included an investigation on the usage of<br />
inflatable technologies. Before the final baseline design, three main steps (including eight<br />
different designs and configurations) were developed followed by two detailed designs of<br />
different interior layouts for the three main zones: the private, the personal and the social zone.<br />
(See THM internal configuration for definitions 3.3.1)<br />
4.3.1.1 Preparing the baseline design – investigations of SHM’s interior configuration<br />
The final diameter for the SHM is 3.60 m, derived from the limitations of the launch vehicle<br />
/diameter of 6.00 m) and the safety distance required between the plume of the MAV during<br />
take-off and the ground or the habitat.<br />
Where and how to place the life support system optimally still remains an open issue. Three<br />
options were considered: at the top level of the habitat, in the middle, and at the bottom. The<br />
option with the LSS at the top level was discarded, because the mass of the LSS would have<br />
been too high up, considering the fact that the MAV with the propulsion tanks already has a<br />
substantially high weight within the overall MEV configuration. Prior to a final conclusion, the<br />
following two options were developed:<br />
4.3.1.2 Option 1 – LSS in the middle of the habitat<br />
SHM - cylinder:<br />
Height: 7.00 m<br />
Diameter: 3.60 m<br />
LSS: 10 m 3 in the middle of the habitat