06.02.2013 Views

ESA Document - Emits - ESA

ESA Document - Emits - ESA

ESA Document - Emits - ESA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

s<br />

HMM<br />

Assessment Study<br />

Report: CDF-20(A)<br />

February 2004<br />

page 23 of 422<br />

These highlevel requirements have the following consequences for the mission case definition:<br />

• Landing on the Martian surface is required. Missions limited to Mars orbit or fly-bys are<br />

not acceptable as design case<br />

• Duration of the stay on the Martian surface shall allow for some excursion (surface EVA)<br />

and sample collection capability (no flag footprint only, as first Apollo mission)<br />

• Mission case shall take into account all the constraints coming from human requirements<br />

(physiology, radiation, habitability, etc.)<br />

From the high-level requirements, a set of more specific technical requirements has been<br />

derived:<br />

2.2.2 Mission-general requirements<br />

• Number of crew: six in total, with three landing on the surface of Mars<br />

• Mars sample collection with EVA required (up to 100 kg) in close proximity of the<br />

landing site<br />

• Launch dates: between 2025 and 2040<br />

• Maximum assembly time in LEO: 6 years (comparable to nominal ISS building time) but<br />

preferably of the order of 2 years to catch up with the opportunity windows to Mars<br />

2.2.3 Safety requirements<br />

The overall safety requirement is a “cultural” choice and depends on the probability of loss of<br />

life the public opinion is ready to accept. A high-level decision between the “pioneer” (high-risk)<br />

approach and the “clerk” (low-risk) approach has to be taken.<br />

For human space flight (ISS, Space Shuttle) the maximum number of acceptable failures leading<br />

to life loss over total number of missions is generally about or equal to 1/200. However, at this<br />

stage this number cannot be verified by analysis, therefore it has been taken only as reference.<br />

For the design only the following requirements have been set:<br />

• All the systems shall be made fail safe and fail operational. Whenever this is not possible<br />

abort scenarios shall be built-in,<br />

• Communication gaps need to be minimised. One week maximum duration is acceptable.<br />

2.2.4 Physiology requirements:<br />

2.2.4.1 Habitability<br />

The habitability requirements can be expressed in terms of “required pressurised volume”,<br />

which, as shown in Figure 2-1, is a function of the mission duration for times less than 100 days.<br />

For longer missions the required volume stays almost constant.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!