ESA Document - Emits - ESA
ESA Document - Emits - ESA ESA Document - Emits - ESA
s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-20(A) February 2004 page 218 of 422 • Vehicle Connections: o Berthing & Docking Capability: � Earth Return Capsule: • Berthing & Docking in LEO • Un-docking during TEI � Martian Decent Module: • Berthing & Docking in LEO • Un-docking during Martian orbit � Mars Ascent Vehicle: • Berthing & Docking in Martian orbit • Un-docking during Martian orbit o Berthing Capability: � All Modules not requiring an un-docking mechanism capability will require a berthing ability for LEO assembly operations. • Crew Egress Hatches: • External Hatches and Locking Mechanism at the ERC and DM Docking Ports • Crew Conditioning and Exercise Facilities: • Crew Exercise Device/Facility • Crew Short Arm centrifuge for 1g environment simulation 3.3.8.1.1 Propulsion module • Vehicle Connections • Berthing Capability � All support structure elements will require a berthing ability for LEO assembly operations. � All propulsion stacks will require a berthing ability. • Release Capability � After use of individual stages, the stage must be released at the support structure I/F. 3.3.8.2 Assumptions and trade-offs 3.3.8.2.1 Power generation system The following assumptions have been derived as a result of the study: • The number of arrays shall be minimised • The technology chosen shall ensure that stowage of the array is possible The following Solar Array Deployment systems are available: 1. Advanced rigid arrays 2. Polar platform arrays The following highlights key features of the two concepts:
s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-20(A) February 2004 page 219 of 422 Advanced rigid arrays have the following features: • Typically four or five panel wings with surface area of 30-35 m 2 (typical panel size 2.5 m x 2.75 m). • Spring-driven, single-direction deployment, with latched panels for in-flight wing stiffness • No Re-stowed latching capability Polar platform arrays have the following features: • Up to 16 panel capability with surface area of 80 m 2 (typical panel size 5 m x 1 m, current qualification status of 14 panels). • Motorised, cable actuated deployment with re-stowage capability (not yet qualified). • No Re-stowed latching capability The Polar platform type array would better suit this application given the number of. Additionally, the requirement for re-stowage is better facilitated with a motorized deployment system. 3.3.8.2.2 Communications system The following assumptions have been derived as a result of the study: • All boom-mounted antennas require tracking capability. • Tracking can be realized with two perpendicular rotational axes. No trade-off has been performed. The choice of the chosen mechanism has been made based upon the available systems and the requirements stated earlier. 3.3.8.2.3 Vehicle connections The following assumptions have been applied: • Only the DM and ERC require berthing and docking ports • Further Module assembly in LEO will be performed by Berthing Mechanisms, aided by LEO facilities i.e. robotic arm capture of module and assisted berthing • A spare berthing and docking port is required for in-orbit contingency Two systems have been considered: 1 Russian Docking System 2 International Docking & Berthing Mechanism (IDBM)
- Page 167 and 168: s 3.3.3.1 Requirements and design d
- Page 169 and 170: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 171 and 172: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 173 and 174: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 175 and 176: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 177 and 178: s flux [W/m2] 250 200 150 100 50 0
- Page 179 and 180: s Figure 3-38: Power required to ma
- Page 181 and 182: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 183 and 184: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 185 and 186: s 3.3.4.3 Assumptions and trade-off
- Page 187 and 188: s 3.3.4.3.3 Power conditioning and
- Page 189 and 190: s 3.3.5 AOCS HMM Assessment Study R
- Page 191 and 192: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 193 and 194: s Configuration Length (m) Total ma
- Page 195 and 196: s 3.3.5.5 ACS for TMI 1 st HMM Asse
- Page 197 and 198: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 199 and 200: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 201 and 202: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 203 and 204: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 205 and 206: s 3.3.6.2 Baseline design HMM Asses
- Page 207 and 208: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 209 and 210: s 5 Reduce 2dB pointing precision t
- Page 211 and 212: s 70-m antenna 70-m antenna 3.3.7.5
- Page 213 and 214: s Angular separation SEM > 10º SEM
- Page 215 and 216: s Figure 3-63: Communications MEV/M
- Page 217: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 221 and 222: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 223 and 224: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 225 and 226: s Element 1: Transfer Habitation Mo
- Page 227 and 228: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 229 and 230: s Radiation Shielding Shielding Req
- Page 231 and 232: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 233 and 234: s The propulsion system and its cha
- Page 235 and 236: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 237 and 238: s Item Nr. Mass [kg] Margin [%] Mas
- Page 239 and 240: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 241 and 242: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 243 and 244: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 245 and 246: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 247 and 248: s 3.4.4 Mechanisms HMM Assessment S
- Page 249 and 250: s 4 MARS EXCURSION VEHICLE 4.1 Syst
- Page 251 and 252: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 253 and 254: s Figure 4-2: Option 2: Vertical co
- Page 255 and 256: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 257 and 258: s 4.3 Surface habitation module Fig
- Page 259 and 260: s Figure 4-11: Section through the
- Page 261 and 262: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 263 and 264: s 4.3.1.5 Baseline design HMM Asses
- Page 265 and 266: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 267 and 268: s 4.3.1.5.3 Top level Figure 4-20:
s<br />
HMM<br />
Assessment Study<br />
Report: CDF-20(A)<br />
February 2004<br />
page 218 of 422<br />
• Vehicle Connections:<br />
o Berthing & Docking Capability:<br />
� Earth Return Capsule:<br />
• Berthing & Docking in LEO<br />
• Un-docking during TEI<br />
� Martian Decent Module:<br />
• Berthing & Docking in LEO<br />
• Un-docking during Martian orbit<br />
� Mars Ascent Vehicle:<br />
• Berthing & Docking in Martian orbit<br />
• Un-docking during Martian orbit<br />
o Berthing Capability:<br />
� All Modules not requiring an un-docking mechanism capability will<br />
require a berthing ability for LEO assembly operations.<br />
• Crew Egress Hatches:<br />
• External Hatches and Locking Mechanism at the ERC and DM Docking Ports<br />
• Crew Conditioning and Exercise Facilities:<br />
• Crew Exercise Device/Facility<br />
• Crew Short Arm centrifuge for 1g environment simulation<br />
3.3.8.1.1 Propulsion module<br />
• Vehicle Connections<br />
• Berthing Capability<br />
� All support structure elements will require a berthing ability for LEO<br />
assembly operations.<br />
� All propulsion stacks will require a berthing ability.<br />
• Release Capability<br />
� After use of individual stages, the stage must be released at the support<br />
structure I/F.<br />
3.3.8.2 Assumptions and trade-offs<br />
3.3.8.2.1 Power generation system<br />
The following assumptions have been derived as a result of the study:<br />
• The number of arrays shall be minimised<br />
• The technology chosen shall ensure that stowage of the array is possible<br />
The following Solar Array Deployment systems are available:<br />
1. Advanced rigid arrays<br />
2. Polar platform arrays<br />
The following highlights key features of the two concepts: