06.02.2013 Views

ESA Document - Emits - ESA

ESA Document - Emits - ESA

ESA Document - Emits - ESA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

s<br />

3.3.3.5 Cryogenic storage for oxygen tanks option<br />

HMM<br />

Assessment Study<br />

Report: CDF-20(A)<br />

February 2004<br />

page 180 of 422<br />

Although it was decided to store the oxygen for the life support system at high pressure, it has<br />

been also investigated the cryogenic technology. This section describes the design for this<br />

option.<br />

Life support subsystem requires 394 kg of liquid oxygen to be stored and maintained for the<br />

duration of the mission (31.6 months). Considering the mass and related volume, it is assumed<br />

that these tanks can be accommodated in the same conditions of storage than for the fuel cells<br />

(no environmental loads from the Sun and planets but radiative environment from surrounding<br />

structures).<br />

The required heat lift is shown in Figure 3-40. The dotted line indicates an ideal solution (heat<br />

lift exactly compensates heat losses through MLI) and the others lines where heat losses exceed<br />

heat lift, solution possible with a tolerance on the BO.<br />

The number of tanks and their diameter are traded off so that despite possible boil-off (BO<br />

dependent on the diameter), the required capacity is reached at the end of the 31.6 months.<br />

Within that hypothesis, Figure 3-40 shows the relationship between tank diameter, number of<br />

tanks and BO. A sensitivity with two different temperatures of saturation (90 and 120K) is<br />

shown, taking into account the variation of density with temperature (higher temperature<br />

improves the performance of cryocooler).<br />

cryocooler heat lift [W]<br />

2.0<br />

1.5<br />

1.0<br />

0.5<br />

Oxygen (90K, 0.1MPa, sink 300K)<br />

0.0<br />

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2<br />

tank diameter [m]<br />

1 tank 2 tanks 3 tanks 4 tanks 6 tanks<br />

8 tanks 11 tanks 16 tanks BO=0<br />

cryocooler heat lift [W]<br />

2.0<br />

1.5<br />

1.0<br />

0.5<br />

Oxygen (120K, 1MPa, sink 300K)<br />

0.0<br />

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2<br />

tank diameter [m]<br />

1 tank 2 tanks 3 tanks 4 tanks 6 tanks<br />

8 tanks 11 tanks 16 tanks BO=0<br />

Figure 3-40: Oxygen tank dimensions<br />

Given a sufficient tolerance on the boil-off, it is therefore not possible to cool down the tank and<br />

reach the required usable mass. The cost in terms of additional mass and volume is however<br />

acceptable, and an active cooling capability is preferred as a mass saving solution.<br />

A hybrid thermal design is retained with maximization of insulation and use of a cooler: the<br />

number of MLI layers is set to 40 layers (DAM) and the pulse tube cooler is chosen as the most<br />

suitable cooling technology for this range of temperature (40-120K).<br />

Significantly funded in the past years, the pulse tube offers now good performance and an<br />

increasing range of application. Very similar to Stirling coolers in its concept, the pulse tube has<br />

a simpler cold finger (no displacer mechanism) allowing a lower vibration level, an increased<br />

robustness and a wider temperature range. The compressor remains identical with the same<br />

configuration as for the Stirling (split configuration where two compressors are mounted back to<br />

back).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!