ESA Document - Emits - ESA
ESA Document - Emits - ESA ESA Document - Emits - ESA
s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-20(A) February 2004 page 170 of 422 Redundancies at different level can be foreseen to cope with diverse contingency situations, depending on the criticality of the failure and required reaction time. The thermal control design shall be capable of operating nominally after a single failure at any point of the TCS architecture. To do so, the safest and standard approach is to have primary and secondary loops fully redundant (in cold redundancy). An alternative to a full and cold redundancy is a possible local reconfiguration (local bypass from nominal to redundant) if adequately completed by redundancy at unit level. Such an approach could eventually lead to a complementary system up to a certain level as long as each can guarantee a nominal mode. This flexibility could prevent a degraded/survival mode after a second failure. Redundancy at unit level for critical units (pumps for example) and adequate provision of spare for maintenance are foreseen depending on the redundancy level. habitat logistic MAV ERC N water loop logistic liquid two phase loop inhabited section Control system Heat rej ection system Figure 3-32: Thermal bus (primary and secondary loop) The choice of a distributed or a centralized thermal control system depends on the system architecture and on the location/distribution of the dissipating elements. A distributed TCS offers thermal hardware simplicity (local thermal control) at the expense of a heavier configuration at system level. The requirements of modularity and flexibility do not call for a distributed architecture but for a centralized system completed by a judicious use of local thermal configuration where advantageous. A modular system is therefore proposed with parallel primary loops to pick up and convey the loads toward a central thermal bus. 3.3.3.4.2 Acquisition system Its function is to remove locally a certain quantity of energy (heat) and the technology of the acquisition is adapted to the type of elements to control: • high dissipative components are mounted on cold plates • medium to low dissipative components are controlled via forced convection and mounted on baseplates thermally connected to the structure (hull or platform) • integrated systems (within racks) are controlled via dedicated fluid loops (gas or liquid) • air is sucked in by fans and canalized in a heat exchanger (air/liquid) and dehumidifying system.
s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-20(A) February 2004 page 171 of 422 Europe has acquired these technologies through the Spacelab and Columbus programs (including internal P/L like Biolab). These techniques can be qualified or mature and require tailoring to low/moderate development to fit specific purposes. Figure 3-33 shows an acquisition system within primary loop: air 630 m3/hr at 27C max 12.3 kW mean + 660W metabolic cold plates assembly liquid/air HX N acquisition system to thermal bus (secondary loop) 13/18 C liquid/liquid HX 1/6 C thermostatic coils (hull, propulsion, ...) 0 W worst case Figure 3-33: Habitat module / primary loop principles N 950 kg/hr at 3.5b, 18C pump assembly accumulator The acquisition system is integrated within a primary loop for which two cold thermal sinks are available (second discrete temperature to cope with high peak dissipation). For certain units requiring a smaller bandwidth, the degree of heat exchange is regulated by the selection of adequate mass flow, such as in the liquid/air heat exchanger where one or two units in parallel can be activated with selectable regulation of the flow for each. Overall recuperated heat is transferred to the loop fluid that circulates inside bypass coils to thermostatically control certain elements. The same principles apply to the MAV and ERC main loops, connected to the thermal bus through hydraulic connectors (two-way sealing by springs) at the interfaces. 3.3.3.4.3 Heat transport system Characterization of the heat transport system can be outlined providing basic features of the fluid loop and its working fluid: • selection of a fluid loop depends mainly on the total power to transfer, the transport distance, and the available working fluid • selection of the working fluid depends on its thermodynamic, hydrodynamic and safety performance (containment materials or man-related safety issues such as toxicity),
- Page 119 and 120: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 121 and 122: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 123 and 124: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 125 and 126: s 3 TRANSFER VEHICLE 3.1 Systems…
- Page 127 and 128: s Operational Requirements It shall
- Page 129 and 130: s Trans Mars Injection Module Mars
- Page 131 and 132: s Figure 3-2: Parallel configuratio
- Page 133 and 134: s Figure 3-6: Global dimensions com
- Page 135 and 136: s Front Node 3.2.3.1.3 EVA systems
- Page 137 and 138: s Trans Mars Injection (three stage
- Page 139 and 140: s Figure 3-16: Recommendations for
- Page 141 and 142: s Factors to be considered Impacts
- Page 143 and 144: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 145 and 146: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 147 and 148: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 149 and 150: s Figure 3-24: Baseline design back
- Page 151 and 152: s Figure 3-26: Baseline design priv
- Page 153 and 154: s Module part 3............= 0 m 3
- Page 155 and 156: s 3.3.2.1 Requirements and design d
- Page 157 and 158: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 159 and 160: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 161 and 162: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 163 and 164: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 165 and 166: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 167 and 168: s 3.3.3.1 Requirements and design d
- Page 169: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 173 and 174: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 175 and 176: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 177 and 178: s flux [W/m2] 250 200 150 100 50 0
- Page 179 and 180: s Figure 3-38: Power required to ma
- Page 181 and 182: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 183 and 184: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 185 and 186: s 3.3.4.3 Assumptions and trade-off
- Page 187 and 188: s 3.3.4.3.3 Power conditioning and
- Page 189 and 190: s 3.3.5 AOCS HMM Assessment Study R
- Page 191 and 192: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 193 and 194: s Configuration Length (m) Total ma
- Page 195 and 196: s 3.3.5.5 ACS for TMI 1 st HMM Asse
- Page 197 and 198: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 199 and 200: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 201 and 202: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 203 and 204: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 205 and 206: s 3.3.6.2 Baseline design HMM Asses
- Page 207 and 208: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 209 and 210: s 5 Reduce 2dB pointing precision t
- Page 211 and 212: s 70-m antenna 70-m antenna 3.3.7.5
- Page 213 and 214: s Angular separation SEM > 10º SEM
- Page 215 and 216: s Figure 3-63: Communications MEV/M
- Page 217 and 218: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 219 and 220: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
s<br />
HMM<br />
Assessment Study<br />
Report: CDF-20(A)<br />
February 2004<br />
page 170 of 422<br />
Redundancies at different level can be foreseen to cope with diverse contingency situations,<br />
depending on the criticality of the failure and required reaction time.<br />
The thermal control design shall be capable of operating nominally after a single failure at any<br />
point of the TCS architecture. To do so, the safest and standard approach is to have primary and<br />
secondary loops fully redundant (in cold redundancy). An alternative to a full and cold<br />
redundancy is a possible local reconfiguration (local bypass from nominal to redundant) if<br />
adequately completed by redundancy at unit level. Such an approach could eventually lead to a<br />
complementary system up to a certain level as long as each can guarantee a nominal mode. This<br />
flexibility could prevent a degraded/survival mode after a second failure. Redundancy at unit<br />
level for critical units (pumps for example) and adequate provision of spare for maintenance are<br />
foreseen depending on the redundancy level.<br />
habitat<br />
logistic<br />
MAV ERC<br />
N<br />
water loop<br />
logistic<br />
liquid<br />
two phase loop<br />
inhabited section<br />
Control<br />
system<br />
Heat rej ection<br />
system<br />
Figure 3-32: Thermal bus (primary and secondary loop)<br />
The choice of a distributed or a centralized thermal control system depends on the system<br />
architecture and on the location/distribution of the dissipating elements. A distributed TCS offers<br />
thermal hardware simplicity (local thermal control) at the expense of a heavier configuration at<br />
system level. The requirements of modularity and flexibility do not call for a distributed<br />
architecture but for a centralized system completed by a judicious use of local thermal<br />
configuration where advantageous. A modular system is therefore proposed with parallel<br />
primary loops to pick up and convey the loads toward a central thermal bus.<br />
3.3.3.4.2 Acquisition system<br />
Its function is to remove locally a certain quantity of energy (heat) and the technology of the<br />
acquisition is adapted to the type of elements to control:<br />
• high dissipative components are mounted on cold plates<br />
• medium to low dissipative components are controlled via forced convection and mounted<br />
on baseplates thermally connected to the structure (hull or platform)<br />
• integrated systems (within racks) are controlled via dedicated fluid loops (gas or liquid)<br />
• air is sucked in by fans and canalized in a heat exchanger (air/liquid) and dehumidifying<br />
system.