ESA Document - Emits - ESA
ESA Document - Emits - ESA ESA Document - Emits - ESA
s Start of Activity Time to Departure [years] HMM Timeframe Operations Duration [years] Activity HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-20(A) February 2004 page 116 of 422 1 May 2025 -8.0 3.0 Assembly operations preparation 29 April 2028 -5.0 3.6 Test and Validation (0.5 years per individual launch) 29 October 2028 -4.5 3.5 Assembly Operations 16 January 2033 -0.2 0.2 Support to Habitation Module Mission Task Habitation Module Mission Operations Task 1 February 2019 -14.2 5.0 Operations support to system study 1 February 2024 -9.2 4.0 Operations definition 1 February 2028 -5.2 4.0 Operations preparation 16 January 2032 -1.2 1.0 Test and Validation 16 January 2033 -0.2 0.0 Take over of S/C composite operations 16 April 2033 0.0 0.5 Transfer to Mars 16 April 2033 0.0 0.1 Commissioning in transfer orbit 11 October 2033 0.5 1.5 Mars operations 28 May 2035 2.1 0.5 Transfer to Earth Martian surface Mission Operations Task 1 February 2017 -16.2 5.0 Operations support to system study 1 February 2022 -11.2 5.0 Mars mission operations definition 1 February 2027 -6.2 5.0 Mars mission preparation 16 January 2032 -1.2 1.0 Mars mission test and validation 16 January 2033 -0.2 0.7 Standby Period 11 October 2033 0.5 0.2 Martian surface Operations (no sand storms assumed) Ground Station and Communications Network 1 April 2021 -12.0 3.0 Operations infrastructure technology studies 1 November 2024 -6.0 3.0 Operations infrastructure build up 29 October 2027 -3.0 1.0 Test and Validation (0.5 years each element) 2.10.2.4 Ground station network Table 2-41: Mission Timeframe TDRSS services The TDRSS service is rented from NASA, only the communication lines to NASA have to be set up. LEOP network An additional 15-m LEOP station is set up in the Pacific. Essential link The essential link is performed with the existing deep-space X-band stations plus a X-band capability at (at least two) of the 70-m Ka-band stations.
s Basic RF link Four 70-m Ka-band stations with more than 20 kW RF uplink power are set up. HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-20(A) February 2004 page 117 of 422 Four Ka-band stations are taken, because the Ka-band link is very vulnerable at low elevations. For the required availability four stations distributed over the Earth are required. The technology is not yet available, neither for the precision pointing nor for the uplink power, but is expected to be available in 2030. High performance optical down link Six 10-m optical terminals are set up. The telescopes are assumed to be of photon bucket design. A photon bucket has a large photon gathering area but only a limited optical quality. (The signal reception is limited by Poisson statistics because of the limited number of photons received.) These telescopes are only used for data reception. Modulation will be based on pulse length. Coherent modulation schemes may be not feasible. Choosing good sites (such as the Tenerife mountaintop site), means availabilities of 84% are achievable for a single station. To achieve above 90% availability, at least two telescopes have to be visible from the spacecraft at any time. The telescopes have to be at distances of more than 2000 km from each other to be in areas of different weather patterns. Weather is permanently monitored. The spacecraft switches beam pointing to a redundant station if weather conditions are bad at one station (beamwidth on Earth is only 350 km to 1250 km). The performance at low Sun-Earth-S/C angles is unclear. Buffers of for example 5 to 10 times the telescope diameter seem impractical. Heating of primary mirror will require design similar to Sun observation telescopes with forced cooling. (Night operations only is not acceptable.) The technology at this scale is unproven. Current ESTEC technology studies reveal technical performance limits. One of the problems is the on-board pointing. The pointing device has to be decoupled from microvibrations and astronaut movements. 2.10.2.5 Communication network A dedicated worldwide communications network (see Figure 2-60) needs to be set up. It serves all the parties involved in the ground and flight operations of the mission. The network consists of two separated networks: the Ground Station Network and the Operational Network. Both are connected via the Mars Operations Control Centre. Only a single control centre (MARS OCC) is shown in Figure 2-60. In the case of a distributed concept, control centres dedicated to a major task can be introduced into the network concept.
- Page 65 and 66: s The core supporting structure has
- Page 67 and 68: s 2.7.7.1.3 Mars excursion module S
- Page 69 and 70: s 2.7.7.1.4 Earth return capsule HM
- Page 71 and 72: s Mission Phase Description Event s
- Page 73 and 74: s Mission Phase Description Event s
- Page 75 and 76: s 2.7.10 Mission performance Table
- Page 77 and 78: s Days on Martian surface 450 400 3
- Page 79 and 80: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 81 and 82: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 83 and 84: s Maximum manoeuvre duration 6 mont
- Page 85 and 86: s % of loss from baseline 20 18 16
- Page 87 and 88: s 2.7.15 Sensitivity analysis HMM A
- Page 89 and 90: s 2.7.15.4 Influence of the mass of
- Page 91 and 92: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 93 and 94: s Parameters used: • No Shuttle
- Page 95 and 96: s 2.8.3.3 Launch 3- Front node Figu
- Page 97 and 98: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 99 and 100: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 101 and 102: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 103 and 104: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 105 and 106: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 107 and 108: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 109 and 110: s 2.10.1.4 Communications HMM Asses
- Page 111 and 112: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 113 and 114: s 2.10.2.2.2 LEO assembly HMM Asses
- Page 115: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 119 and 120: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 121 and 122: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 123 and 124: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 125 and 126: s 3 TRANSFER VEHICLE 3.1 Systems…
- Page 127 and 128: s Operational Requirements It shall
- Page 129 and 130: s Trans Mars Injection Module Mars
- Page 131 and 132: s Figure 3-2: Parallel configuratio
- Page 133 and 134: s Figure 3-6: Global dimensions com
- Page 135 and 136: s Front Node 3.2.3.1.3 EVA systems
- Page 137 and 138: s Trans Mars Injection (three stage
- Page 139 and 140: s Figure 3-16: Recommendations for
- Page 141 and 142: s Factors to be considered Impacts
- Page 143 and 144: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 145 and 146: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 147 and 148: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 149 and 150: s Figure 3-24: Baseline design back
- Page 151 and 152: s Figure 3-26: Baseline design priv
- Page 153 and 154: s Module part 3............= 0 m 3
- Page 155 and 156: s 3.3.2.1 Requirements and design d
- Page 157 and 158: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 159 and 160: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 161 and 162: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 163 and 164: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 165 and 166: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
s<br />
Basic RF link<br />
Four 70-m Ka-band stations with more than 20 kW RF uplink power are set up.<br />
HMM<br />
Assessment Study<br />
Report: CDF-20(A)<br />
February 2004<br />
page 117 of 422<br />
Four Ka-band stations are taken, because the Ka-band link is very vulnerable at low elevations.<br />
For the required availability four stations distributed over the Earth are required.<br />
The technology is not yet available, neither for the precision pointing nor for the uplink power,<br />
but is expected to be available in 2030.<br />
High performance optical down link<br />
Six 10-m optical terminals are set up.<br />
The telescopes are assumed to be of photon bucket design. A photon bucket has a large photon<br />
gathering area but only a limited optical quality. (The signal reception is limited by Poisson<br />
statistics because of the limited number of photons received.) These telescopes are only used for<br />
data reception. Modulation will be based on pulse length. Coherent modulation schemes may be<br />
not feasible.<br />
Choosing good sites (such as the Tenerife mountaintop site), means availabilities of 84% are<br />
achievable for a single station. To achieve above 90% availability, at least two telescopes have to<br />
be visible from the spacecraft at any time. The telescopes have to be at distances of more than<br />
2000 km from each other to be in areas of different weather patterns.<br />
Weather is permanently monitored. The spacecraft switches beam pointing to a redundant station<br />
if weather conditions are bad at one station (beamwidth on Earth is only 350 km to 1250 km).<br />
The performance at low Sun-Earth-S/C angles is unclear. Buffers of for example 5 to 10 times<br />
the telescope diameter seem impractical. Heating of primary mirror will require design similar to<br />
Sun observation telescopes with forced cooling. (Night operations only is not acceptable.)<br />
The technology at this scale is unproven. Current ESTEC technology studies reveal technical<br />
performance limits. One of the problems is the on-board pointing. The pointing device has to be<br />
decoupled from microvibrations and astronaut movements.<br />
2.10.2.5 Communication network<br />
A dedicated worldwide communications network (see Figure 2-60) needs to be set up. It serves<br />
all the parties involved in the ground and flight operations of the mission.<br />
The network consists of two separated networks: the Ground Station Network and the<br />
Operational Network. Both are connected via the Mars Operations Control Centre.<br />
Only a single control centre (MARS OCC) is shown in Figure 2-60. In the case of a distributed<br />
concept, control centres dedicated to a major task can be introduced into the network concept.