ESA Document - Emits - ESA

s
HMM
Assessment Study
Report: CDF-20(A)
February 2004
page 11 of 422
FIGURE 3-48: TEI AND MOI CONFIGURATION ...........................................................................................................191
FIGURE 3-49: TMI 3 RD CONFIGURATION.....................................................................................................................192
FIGURE 3-50: TMI 2 ND CONFIGURATION.....................................................................................................................194
FIGURE 3-51: TMI 1 ST CONFIGURATION .....................................................................................................................195
FIGURE 3-52: ELECTRICAL ARCHITECTURE................................................................................................................196
FIGURE 3-53: COMPARISON OF PRESENT ROADMAPS FOR SPACE QUALIFIED AND COMMERCIAL MICROPROCESSORS .197
FIGURE 3-54: IBM FOUNDRY ROADMAP FOR HIGH-PERFORMANCE MICROPROCESSORS.............................................198
FIGURE 3-55: COMPLEXITY OF INTERCONNECTED BUSSES AS A FUNCTION OF BANDWITH .........................................200
FIGURE 3-56: INTEROPERABILITY SCENARIO FOR A MARS MISSION. ..........................................................................202
FIGURE 3-57: POINTING DETECTOR SYSTEM. IT IS USED TOGETHER AN INERTIAL SENSOR. ........................................209
FIGURE 3-58: UHF TV-SHM LINK............................................................................................................................212
FIGURE 3-59: COMMUNICATIONS LINKS DURING CRUISE AND MARS ORBIT PHASES WORST CASES............................213
FIGURE 3-60: COMMUNICATIONS LINKS AFTER MEV LANDING. NORMAL AND CONTINGENCY CASES ......................214
FIGURE 3-61: COMMUNICATIONS LINKS BEFORE MAV TAKE OFF .............................................................................214
FIGURE 3-62: COMMUNICATIONS DURING SOLAR SUPERIOR CONJUNCTION ...............................................................214
FIGURE 3-63: COMMUNICATIONS MEV/MAV-TV DURING TAKE OFF – RENDEZVOUS AND UNDOCKING-LANDING...215
FIGURE 3-64: TV COMMUNICATIONS BUDGET SUMMARY ..........................................................................................216
FIGURE 3-65: RUSSIAN DOCKING SYSTEM & INTERNATIONAL BERTHING & DOCKING MECHANISM........................220
FIGURE 3-66: ACTIVE AND PASSIVE COMMON BERTHING MECHANISMS.....................................................................223
FIGURE 3-67: FLYWHEEL EXERCISE DEVICE...............................................................................................................223
FIGURE 3-68: ROTATION MOMENTUM........................................................................................................................224
FIGURE 3-69: DEBRIS CLOUD CONTACT BETWEEN ALUMINIUM AND NEXTEL MOD, [RD56]. ...................................227
FIGURE 3-70 – MOD SHIELDING CONFIGURATION....................................................................................................227
FIGURE 3-71: SHIELDING CONFIGURATION FOR THE STORM-SHELTER. ......................................................................229
FIGURE 3-72: VULCAIN 2........................................................................................................................................231
FIGURE 3-73: RD 0212 ..............................................................................................................................................233
FIGURE 3-74: TANDEM CONFIGURATION....................................................................................................................235
FIGURE 3-75:COMPARATIVE STORAGE TECHNOLOGY (L), HYDROGEN PHASE DIAGRAM (R)....................................................239
FIGURE 3-76: TANKS SCHEMATIC ..............................................................................................................................240
FIGURE 3-77: HEAT LOSS ...........................................................................................................................................241
FIGURE 3-78; EQUIVALENT EFFICIENCY AND HEAT LOOSES AS A FUNCTION OF THE NUMBER OF LAYERS ..................241
FIGURE 3-79: COP EFFICIENCY AND INPUT POWER AS FUNCTION OF TC ....................................................................243
FIGURE 3-80: TB SCHEMATIC (1 STAGE)....................................................................................................................243
FIGURE 3-81: THERMO-OPTICAL PROPERTIES AND MLI EQUIVALENT EFFICIENCY ....................................................246
FIGURE 4-1: OPTION 1: HORIZONTAL CONFIGURATION.............................................................................................252
FIGURE 4-2: OPTION 2: VERTICAL CONFIGURATION ..................................................................................................253
FIGURE 4-3: MARS EXCURSION VEHICLE....................................................................................................................254
FIGURE 4-4: GLOBAL DIMENSIONS MARS EXCURSION VEHICLE .................................................................................254
FIGURE 4-5: SURFACE HABITATION MODULE .............................................................................................................255
FIGURE 4-6: GLOBAL DIMENSIONS SURFACE HABITATION MODULE ...........................................................................255
FIGURE 4-7: MARS ASCENT VEHICLE .........................................................................................................................256
FIGURE 4-8: CAPSULE OF THE MAV WITH THE CONICAL INTERFACE TO SURFACE HABITATION MODULE..................256
FIGURE 4-9: MARS EXCURSION VEHICLE; CAPSULE WITH ITS SECOND STAGE............................................................257
FIGURE 4-10: AXONOMETRIC SKETCH OF OPTION 1 WITH LSS IN THE MIDDLE OF THE SHM.....................................258
FIGURE 4-11: SECTION THROUGH THE SHM AND PLAN OF THE LOWER LEVEL – WORKSPACE AND EVA ACCESS .....259
FIGURE 4-12: SECTION THROUGH THE SHM (L), PLAN OF THE LOWER LEVEL (R) – WORKSPACE AND EVA ACCESS 259
FIGURE 4-13: SKETCH OF OPTION 2 WITH LSS AT THE BASE .....................................................................................260
FIGURE 4-14: SECTIONAL DRAWINGS OF OPTION 2 ....................................................................................................261
FIGURE 4-15: PLAN OF LOWER LEVEL, UPPER LEVEL AND MID LEVEL, RESPECTIVELY, FROM LEFT TO RIGHT ............262
FIGURE 4-16: AXONOMETRIC OF THE FINAL DESIGN STATUS .....................................................................................263
FIGURE 4-17: SECTION OF THE FINAL DESIGN STATUS................................................................................................264
FIGURE 4-18: PLAN OF LOWER LEVEL ........................................................................................................................265
FIGURE 4-19: “AIRLOCKLESS”-AIRLOCK SYSTEM, CURRENTLY FURTHER DEVELOPED AT EADS, GERMANY...........266
FIGURE 4-20: PLAN OF MID LEVEL .............................................................................................................................267
FIGURE 4-21: PLAN OF TOP LEVEL .............................................................................................................................268
FIGURE 4-22: YUZHNOYE RD 861-G...................................................................................................................269