ESA Document - Emits - ESA
ESA Document - Emits - ESA ESA Document - Emits - ESA
s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-20(A) February 2004 page 108 of 422 • Higher robustness level required than with today’s satellites (e.g. higher number of sensors, fuzzy logic connection between sensors, distributed intelligence connected by a net) • Redundancy switching on lowest level (intelligent units required with self analysis capability) Active management of redundancy restoration on higher level • Out of limit checks also on-board • On-board capacity to repair • On-board capacity to patch software • Tools (e.g. simulators) required on-board (capacity for off-line testing required) • Ground – orbit cooperation to fix things despite long ground feedback time • More robust systems may make use of advanced technologies such as: • Intelligent sensors • Fuzzy logic • Artificial sensors (on the basis of intrinsic redundancies) • Intelligent consistency checks (on the basis of intrinsic redundancies) • Intelligent fault tolerance and recovery to enable for early warning/reconfiguration and optimum use of on-board systems • Optimisation of processes may make use of: • Adaptive control • Data fusion 2.10.1.3 Ground operations features The following ground features have been considered: • 24-hour-manned (small core team) monitoring of Martian TV and MEV • On-call availability of full operational team • Engineering capacity and real mock up on ground (requirement to track all configuration changes and actions on-board and to implement them on ground, increases down traffic for astronaut TCs) • Operations processes to be updated to reflect manned safety • Long feedback loops for deep-space limit the ground operation activities to planning off line monitoring and support • Cooperation with crew for tasks requiring short feedback • Continuous training of crew • High degree of crew autonomy requires concept to track actions of crew • Ground control would have to keep track of the changes and still keep an inventory of items and their state of usability Concerning crew communication, the following shall be implemented: • Crew to be enabled for email communications and internet access for personal, private, health, religion and work-related interests • On-board personal server to be available to the crew on-board that mirrors internet sites of personal interest to be available to the crew • E.g. a scientist working in his field of expertise. A three-year mission disrupts astronaut from contact to Earth scientific community. Astronauts should be able to contact and work with the Earth community via email and internet. High uplink rate expected. Safe firewall required
s 2.10.1.4 Communications HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-20(A) February 2004 page 109 of 422 2.10.1.4.1 Earth orbit S-band ground stations of the ESA LEOP network are used for LEOP and emergency. An additional station is set up to fill the Pacific gap. The routine communications in assembly orbit are via a TDRSS. This structure is assumed to be still existing. 2.10.1.4.2 Mars orbit relay Communications from surface of Mars to Mars orbiting transfer vehicle would be limited to short slots. 24-hour communications require a Mars stationary satellite. Redundancy (approximately 10 h coverage/day) by direct link to Earth. Relay satellite is also used to support rendezvous and docking communication and navigation. 2.10.1.4.3 Solar flare warning infrastructure Early warning for solar flares is required, e.g. to reschedule EVAs. Potentially Sun-orbiting warning spacecraft(s) are required. Near 24-hour coverage for warning message is required. 2.10.1.4.4 Link requirements (cruise and at Mars) • Near 24-hour/day communications capability required for all links • Crew communications requires video: • Currently available RF links not sufficient at far distances • Link should be available at crew working hours • Availability should exceed 90% • Crew requires internet capabilities: • High performance (off line) uplink (with on-board server) • Link should be available round the clock • Availability should exceed 90% • Crew requires permanent presence communications link: • Near real time video, voice, and e-mail at a medium level performance • Link should be available round the clock (small gaps allowable) • Availability should exceed 95% • Availability should exceed 99% for 18 hours within a full day • Spacecraft is one to two orders more complex than today’s planetary spacecrafts, software complexity and diversity may be even higher
- Page 57 and 58: s stack 9 Propellant mass of the ne
- Page 59 and 60: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 61 and 62: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 63 and 64: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 65 and 66: s The core supporting structure has
- Page 67 and 68: s 2.7.7.1.3 Mars excursion module S
- Page 69 and 70: s 2.7.7.1.4 Earth return capsule HM
- Page 71 and 72: s Mission Phase Description Event s
- Page 73 and 74: s Mission Phase Description Event s
- Page 75 and 76: s 2.7.10 Mission performance Table
- Page 77 and 78: s Days on Martian surface 450 400 3
- Page 79 and 80: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 81 and 82: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 83 and 84: s Maximum manoeuvre duration 6 mont
- Page 85 and 86: s % of loss from baseline 20 18 16
- Page 87 and 88: s 2.7.15 Sensitivity analysis HMM A
- Page 89 and 90: s 2.7.15.4 Influence of the mass of
- Page 91 and 92: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 93 and 94: s Parameters used: • No Shuttle
- Page 95 and 96: s 2.8.3.3 Launch 3- Front node Figu
- Page 97 and 98: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 99 and 100: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 101 and 102: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 103 and 104: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 105 and 106: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 107: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 111 and 112: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 113 and 114: s 2.10.2.2.2 LEO assembly HMM Asses
- Page 115 and 116: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 117 and 118: s Basic RF link Four 70-m Ka-band s
- Page 119 and 120: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 121 and 122: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 123 and 124: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 125 and 126: s 3 TRANSFER VEHICLE 3.1 Systems…
- Page 127 and 128: s Operational Requirements It shall
- Page 129 and 130: s Trans Mars Injection Module Mars
- Page 131 and 132: s Figure 3-2: Parallel configuratio
- Page 133 and 134: s Figure 3-6: Global dimensions com
- Page 135 and 136: s Front Node 3.2.3.1.3 EVA systems
- Page 137 and 138: s Trans Mars Injection (three stage
- Page 139 and 140: s Figure 3-16: Recommendations for
- Page 141 and 142: s Factors to be considered Impacts
- Page 143 and 144: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 145 and 146: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 147 and 148: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
- Page 149 and 150: s Figure 3-24: Baseline design back
- Page 151 and 152: s Figure 3-26: Baseline design priv
- Page 153 and 154: s Module part 3............= 0 m 3
- Page 155 and 156: s 3.3.2.1 Requirements and design d
- Page 157 and 158: s HMM Assessment Study Report: CDF-
s<br />
2.10.1.4 Communications<br />
HMM<br />
Assessment Study<br />
Report: CDF-20(A)<br />
February 2004<br />
page 109 of 422<br />
2.10.1.4.1 Earth orbit<br />
S-band ground stations of the <strong>ESA</strong> LEOP network are used for LEOP and emergency. An<br />
additional station is set up to fill the Pacific gap.<br />
The routine communications in assembly orbit are via a TDRSS. This structure is assumed to be<br />
still existing.<br />
2.10.1.4.2 Mars orbit relay<br />
Communications from surface of Mars to Mars orbiting transfer vehicle would be limited to<br />
short slots. 24-hour communications require a Mars stationary satellite.<br />
Redundancy (approximately 10 h coverage/day) by direct link to Earth.<br />
Relay satellite is also used to support rendezvous and docking communication and navigation.<br />
2.10.1.4.3 Solar flare warning infrastructure<br />
Early warning for solar flares is required, e.g. to reschedule EVAs. Potentially Sun-orbiting<br />
warning spacecraft(s) are required. Near 24-hour coverage for warning message is required.<br />
2.10.1.4.4 Link requirements (cruise and at Mars)<br />
• Near 24-hour/day communications capability required for all links<br />
• Crew communications requires video:<br />
• Currently available RF links not sufficient at far distances<br />
• Link should be available at crew working hours<br />
• Availability should exceed 90%<br />
• Crew requires internet capabilities:<br />
• High performance (off line) uplink (with on-board server)<br />
• Link should be available round the clock<br />
• Availability should exceed 90%<br />
• Crew requires permanent presence communications link:<br />
• Near real time video, voice, and e-mail at a medium level performance<br />
• Link should be available round the clock (small gaps allowable)<br />
• Availability should exceed 95%<br />
• Availability should exceed 99% for 18 hours within a full day<br />
• Spacecraft is one to two orders more complex than today’s planetary spacecrafts,<br />
software complexity and diversity may be even higher