Liz McKercher elizabeth.mckercher@deq.virginia.gov Craig Lott ...
Liz McKercher elizabeth.mckercher@deq.virginia.gov Craig Lott ...
Liz McKercher elizabeth.mckercher@deq.virginia.gov Craig Lott ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Liz</strong> <strong>McKercher</strong><br />
<strong>elizabeth</strong>.<strong>mckercher@deq</strong>.<strong>virginia</strong>.<strong>gov</strong><br />
<strong>Craig</strong> <strong>Lott</strong><br />
craig.lott@deq.<strong>virginia</strong>.<strong>gov</strong>
�Definition �Definition and Background<br />
�TMDL development process<br />
�Incorporating �Incorporating Construction Stormwater<br />
Discharges: Past and Present<br />
�TMDL �TMDL-Stormwater Stormwater Universe in Virginia<br />
�Presentation �Presentation Goal: Provide the RAP with<br />
sufficient information to construct<br />
regulatory language
�� Federal Clean Water Act, Act Section 303(d)<br />
• List impaired waters, develop TMDLs<br />
� 40 CFR Section § 130.7<br />
• Water Quality Planning and Management<br />
• TMDLs shall take into account critical conditions for<br />
stream t flow, fl lloading, di and d water t quality lit parameters t<br />
� Code of Virginia,<br />
• §62 §62.1-44.15 1-44 15 (10) & (23) and §62 §62.1-44.19:4 1-44 19:4 and 19:8<br />
� Water Quality Management Planning<br />
Regulation egu at o (9 VVAC-25-720) C 5 0)
1972 1999 2010 2014-15<br />
Clean Water<br />
Act 303(d)<br />
•Each State shall<br />
establish for the<br />
waters identified<br />
...the total maximum<br />
daily load<br />
Settlement by<br />
EPA, Consent<br />
Decree (CD)<br />
•To meet the CD,<br />
Vi Virginia i i completed l t d<br />
TMDLs covering<br />
approximately 225<br />
shellfish and 333<br />
non-shellfish<br />
impairments<br />
TMDL<br />
development<br />
continues<br />
post-CD<br />
• Over 1,100<br />
additional waters<br />
require TMDLs<br />
• 100 TMDLs per<br />
biennium<br />
expected<br />
2002<br />
Clarification from EPA on NPDES-<br />
regulated storm water discharges as<br />
wasteload allocation<br />
EPA modifies<br />
watershed<br />
cleanup<br />
performance<br />
measures<br />
• Begin giving<br />
credit for non-<br />
TMDL solutions<br />
• TMDLs still one<br />
watershed t h d clean- l<br />
up tool
�Maximum load of a specified pollutant<br />
that a water body can assimilate and<br />
attain water quality standards<br />
�Includes a wasteload allocation (point<br />
sources), load allocation (non-point<br />
sources) and a margin of safety.
�TMDL �TMDL = WLA + LA + MOS
�40 �40 CFR '122 122.44(d)(1)(vii)(B), 44(d)(1)(vii)(B) “Effluent Effluent<br />
limits developed to protect a narrative<br />
water quality criterion, criterion a numeric water<br />
quality criterion, or both, are consistent<br />
with assumptions and requirements of<br />
any available WLA for the discharge<br />
prepared by the State and approved by<br />
EPA pursuant to 40 CFR '130.7.”
� Benthic Impairment<br />
• Water body not fully supporting its uses due to water<br />
quality violations of the general aquatic life (benthic)<br />
standard.<br />
�� Aquatic Life Standard<br />
• Based on the aquatic, benthic (or bottom‐dwelling)<br />
macroinvertebrates (organisms without backbones<br />
that t atca can be seen see with w t the t enaked a ed eye) tthat at form o tthe e<br />
foundation of a stream’s food chain.<br />
� The aquatic life water quality standard<br />
states that all state waters should support a<br />
healthy and diverse community of bugs and<br />
fish.
EVALUATE WATERSHED AND<br />
IMPAIRMENT<br />
Water quality data, stressors/sources, climatic conditions, soils,<br />
watershed land use, model existing conditions.<br />
Stakeholder Input<br />
IDENTIFY ENDPOINT<br />
St Stakeholder k h ld IInput t<br />
Water Quality Standards or Reference Condition<br />
MODEL SCENARIOS<br />
Determine allocation of the load among point sources and non-<br />
point i t sources and d allow ll for f a margin i of f safety, f t and d future f t growth. th<br />
Identify reductions.<br />
Stakeholder Input
�Model framework:<br />
• General Watershed Loading Function (GWLF) or<br />
Hydrologic Simulation Program Fortran (HSPF)<br />
�Source Assessment:<br />
• Quantify Construction Storm Load from permits<br />
queried and stakeholder input<br />
�Waste load allocation
�Construction �Construction loads – not clearly<br />
distinguished as a point source (~2004)<br />
�Future �Future activities not explicitly discussed
� Identify y Construction Stormwater as a ppoint<br />
source<br />
• Some TMDLS aggregate the construction load with<br />
that of the MS4<br />
� Allow for future growth in Construction<br />
Stormwater permitted activities (~2011)<br />
�� Differentiate between in-stream loads and<br />
land-based<br />
� Often differentiate between activities within<br />
and d outside t id of f MS4 boundary b d<br />
� By 2011, 48 TMDLs for sediment, 9 for<br />
Phosphorus p , ,pplus the Bay ywatershed
�Many �Many point source permits listed<br />
�Some point sources given an individual<br />
WLA (e.g. (e g waste water treatment plant)<br />
�Others given an aggregated WLA by<br />
source category (e.g. (e g construction)
� Benthic TMDL Watersheds Sediment,<br />
Nitrogen, Phosphorus, including TSS for<br />
the Chesapeake Bay<br />
� Local watershed TMDLs in Virginia where<br />
th the equation ti address dd TSS and d TDS have h<br />
addressed mining sources<br />
� pH TMDL studies to date result in<br />
recommendation for swamp waters<br />
designation designation, or there are co co-pollutants pollutants
Six TMDLs Requiring Additional Measures<br />
TMDL Name Pollutant Total Reductions*<br />
Goose Creek Sediment 70%<br />
Mossy Creek Sediment 74.9%<br />
Mill Creek Watershed Sediment 69‐73%<br />
Bull Run Sediment 77 77.37% 37%<br />
Rivanna River Watershed Sediment 0/59.3%<br />
Outside of MS4/Inside MS4<br />
Difficult Run Sediment 73%<br />
*Reductions to a site with no management/no E&S.
2003 TMDLs - Interpreted to Require<br />
Additional Measures<br />
TMDL Name Pollutant Total Reductions*<br />
Blacks Run Watershed sediment 70%<br />
Cooks Creek Watershed<br />
sediment & Phosphorus 90%<br />
Mill Creek Watershed sediment 70%<br />
Pleasant Run Watershed sediment 80%<br />
Pleasant Run Watershed Phosphorus 80%<br />
Holmans Run sediment 70%<br />
*Reductions to a site with no management/no g /<br />
E&S.
http://www.deq.<strong>virginia</strong>.<strong>gov</strong>/ConnectWithDEQ/VEGIS/VEGISDatasets.aspx
http://www.deq.<strong>virginia</strong>.<strong>gov</strong>/Programs/Water/WaterQualityInformationTMD<br />
Ls/TMDL/TMDLDevelopment/ApprovedTMDLReports.aspx
http://www.deq.<strong>virginia</strong>.<strong>gov</strong>/Programs/<br />
Water/WaterQualityInformationTMDLs/T<br />
MDL/TMDLImplementation/TMDLImple<br />
mentationPlans.aspx
� B.Limitation on coverage. g<br />
� TMDL limitation. Discharges to waters for which a<br />
wasteload allocation (WLA) for a pollutant has<br />
been established in a "total maximum daily y load"<br />
(TMDL) approved by the State Water Control<br />
Board that would apply to stormwater discharges<br />
from o a co construction st uct o act activity v ty are a enot ot eligible e g b e for o<br />
coverage under this permit unless the<br />
stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP)<br />
developed by the operator is consistent with the<br />
requirements related to TMDLs contained in<br />
Section II D 6.
�� 6. Total maximum daily loads. A total<br />
maximum daily load (TMDL) approved by<br />
the State Water Control Board may include a<br />
wasteload allocation to the regulated<br />
construction activity that identifies the<br />
pollutant for which stormwater control<br />
measures are necessary f for the h surface f<br />
waters to meet water quality standards. The<br />
pollutant po uta t identified de t ed in a wasteload waste oad allocation a ocat o<br />
as of the effective date of this permit must<br />
be specified in the SWPPP……
� The SWPPP shall include strategies g and control<br />
measures to ensure consistency with the<br />
assumptions and requirements of the TMDL WLA<br />
that apply to the operator's discharge. In a<br />
situation i i where h a TMDL has h specified ifi d a general l<br />
wasteload allocation applicable to construction<br />
stormwater discharges, but no specific requirements<br />
for construction sites have been identified in the<br />
TMDL, the operator shall consult with the state or<br />
federal TMDL authority to confirm that meeting<br />
permit requirements will be consistent with the<br />
approved TMDL. If the TMDL specifically precludes<br />
such discharges, the operator is not eligible for<br />
coverage under the general permit.
� Erosion and Sediment Control Plans and<br />
Stormwater Management Plans required under<br />
the general permit (with the exception of those<br />
plans p for sites previously p y covered under a<br />
previous version of the general permit) shall<br />
include a written explanation demonstrating that<br />
the t epa plan addessest addresses these eseccritical tca po points tsoof<br />
interest in addition to the basic elements<br />
included in those plans:<br />
� i. Protection measures for discharges to the<br />
� i. Protection measures for discharges to the<br />
Chesapeake Bay or impaired waters or<br />
� waters with an established TMDL.
� Part V. CONSISTENCY WITH TOTAL MAXIMUM<br />
DAILY LOADS<br />
� If the discharge covered by this permit enters a<br />
water with an established or approved Total<br />
MMaximum i<br />
� Daily Load (TMDL), the permittee must implement<br />
measures to ensure that the discharge of pollutants<br />
�� from the site is consistent with the assumptions and<br />
meets the requirements of the approved TMDL,<br />
� including any specific wasteload allocation that has<br />
been established that would apply to the discharge discharge.