Role of Intestinal Microbiota in Ulcerative Colitis
Role of Intestinal Microbiota in Ulcerative Colitis Role of Intestinal Microbiota in Ulcerative Colitis
Introduction Methodology part 42 Paper 1 The aim of this study was to compare the fecal microbiota derived from healthy controls, and UC patients in either remission or relapse. Flow diagram The author, Louise K. Vigsnæs, participated in the design of the study, conducted the experiments, performed the data analyzes and drafted the manuscript.
Gram‐negative bacteria account for differences in fecal microbiota between patients with ulcerative colitis and healthy controls Louise Kristine Vigsnæs 1 § , Jørn Brynskov, 2 Andrea Wilcks 1* and Tine Rask Licht 1 . 1 Department of Microbiology and Risk Assessment, National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Mørkhøj Bygade 19, 2860 Søborg, Denmark. 2 Department of Medical Gastroenterology, Herlev Hospital, 2730 Herlev, Denmark. *present address: CBRN institute, Datavej 16, 3460 Birkerød, Denmark. § Corresponding author Key words: Ulcerative colitis, microbiota composition, Gram‐negative bacteria, qPCR 1
- Page 10 and 11: Dansk sammendrag Dansk sammendrag M
- Page 12 and 13: Introduction and objectives Introdu
- Page 14 and 15: List of Manuscripts Not included in
- Page 16 and 17: List of contents List of Centents P
- Page 18 and 19: List of Centents Methodology append
- Page 21 and 22: 1. The intestinal environment Theor
- Page 23 and 24: Theoretical part 5 1. The intestina
- Page 25 and 26: 2. The colonic environment Theoreti
- Page 27 and 28: Theoretical part 9 2. The colonic e
- Page 29 and 30: Table 1: The presence of glycoside
- Page 31 and 32: Theoretical part Figure 3: The colo
- Page 33 and 34: 3. Inflammatory Bowel disease Theor
- Page 35 and 36: Theoretical part 17 3. Inflammatory
- Page 37 and 38: Theoretical part 19 4. Modulation o
- Page 39 and 40: Theoretical part 21 4. Modulation o
- Page 41 and 42: Theoretical part 23 4. Modulation o
- Page 43 and 44: Table 4: Clinical trials on the pre
- Page 45 and 46: Theoretical part 5. Production of p
- Page 47 and 48: Theoretical part 5. Production of p
- Page 49 and 50: Theoretical part 5. Production of p
- Page 51: Methodology part
- Page 54 and 55: Methodology part 6. Methodology, co
- Page 56 and 57: Methodology part 6. Methodology, co
- Page 58 and 59: Methodology part 6. Methodology, co
- Page 62 and 63: Abstract Background Detailed knowle
- Page 64 and 65: depending the level of disease acti
- Page 66 and 67: in 1 x TAE at 60 °C for 16 h at 36
- Page 68 and 69: Statistics PCA were generated by SA
- Page 70 and 71: The PCA of the Gram‐positive bact
- Page 72 and 73: layer of UC patients and found that
- Page 74 and 75: Acknowledgements The authors thank
- Page 76 and 77: Table 2 ‐ 16S rRNA gene and 16S
- Page 78 and 79: 1. Firmicutes phylum 2. Bacteroidet
- Page 80 and 81: Supplementary Figure S1. Dice clust
- Page 82 and 83: Reference List 1. Ahmed S, Macfarla
- Page 84 and 85: 32. Matsuki T, Watanabe K, Fujimoto
- Page 87 and 88: Methodology part Paper 2 Fecal lact
- Page 89 and 90: Fecal lactobacilli and bifidobacter
- Page 91 and 92: Introduction The mucus layer lining
- Page 93 and 94: efore enrolment and there was no si
- Page 95 and 96: (Bio‐Rad Labs, Hercules, Californ
- Page 97 and 98: Microbial community analysis using
- Page 99 and 100: difference from the luminal microbi
- Page 101 and 102: that C. coccoides group and C. lept
- Page 103 and 104: Table 1 ‐ 16S rRNA gene of phylum
- Page 105 and 106: Table 2 ‐ Preference of bacterial
- Page 107 and 108: Figure 1. A) Schematic overview of
- Page 109 and 110: A. B. Figure 3. Principal component
Introduction<br />
Methodology part<br />
42<br />
Paper 1<br />
The aim <strong>of</strong> this study was to compare the fecal microbiota derived from healthy controls, and UC<br />
patients <strong>in</strong> either remission or relapse.<br />
Flow diagram<br />
The author, Louise K. Vigsnæs, participated <strong>in</strong> the design <strong>of</strong> the study, conducted the experiments,<br />
performed the data analyzes and drafted the manuscript.
Change language