Role of Intestinal Microbiota in Ulcerative Colitis

Role of Intestinal Microbiota in Ulcerative Colitis Role of Intestinal Microbiota in Ulcerative Colitis

05.02.2013 Views

Methodology part 6. Methodology, considerations and choices extraction methods and two of the major concerns important for accuracy of ecological studies are cell lysis efficiency and quality of DNA extracts (Li et al., 2003). DNA from organisms, which cell walls are easily lysed (Gram‐negative bacteria) can be sheared, if the extraction conditions are too rough. However, DNA can be difficult to recover from organisms with rigid cell walls (Gram‐ positive bacteria), if the cell lysis is insufficient. Additionally, it is important that extracted DNA is without unfavorable substances, because they may inhibit e.g. PCR amplification (Monteiro et al., 1997;Lantz et al., 1997). Mechanical disruption of human fecal samples prior extraction using QIAamp DNA stool MiniKit has previously shown to improve the amount and quality of DNA (Li et al., 2007;Smith et al., 2011). Thus, combination of these two methods allows effective lyses of bacteria cells and removal of organic contaminants leading to high quality DNA that can be further analyzed using down‐stream molecular techniques (Li et al., 2003). Prior to the in vitro studies performed in the experimental part of this thesis (Paper 2‐6), the combined extraction method was validated by extracting DNA from both fermentation samples at 0 hours and fecal samples (n=6, healthy subjects) to ensure that this method could yield the same amount of DNA from the different sample types. Eight bacterial groups (four Gram‐negative and four Gram‐positive bacteria) were quantified by qPCR to compare DNA extracted from either fermentation or fecal samples. The results demonstrated no significant difference between the two sample types for the eight bacterial taxa (Appendix 2). Hence, the combined extraction method was used to extract DNA from both fecal and fermentation samples in the experiments of this thesis (Paper 2‐6). 6.5. Quantitative Real-Time PCR QPCR is a useful tool for quantitative detection of target sequences in e.g. bacterial community, due to its high sensitivity. In qPCR, the accumulation of product amplification is detected by the presence of a fluorescence reporter. The quantification is done by measuring the number of cycles required for fluorescent signal to reach a threshold level. The cycle number is proportional to the number of copies of DNA templates in a sample (Saunders, 2009). Different fluorescence reporters can be used in qPCR assay. One approached is the specific hybridization of a duallabelled TaqMan probe to PCR product. Another is based upon the binding of the fluorescent dye SYBR‐Green into the PCR product (Ponchel et al., 2003). SYBR‐Green was used as fluorescent reporter in the qPCR assays in Paper 1‐6. 38

Methodology part 6. Methodology, considerations and choices Absolute or relative quantity can be used to calculate the level of bacterial target in a specific sample. Using absolute quantity, the amount of target bacterial nucleic acid is determined by an external standard, where it is important that the sequence of the standard is similar to the target sequence; hence the primer set binding site of the standard should be identical to that in the target sequence. Using relative quantity, the gene‐ofinterest is compared in relation to a reference gene. Hence, the target bacterial gene sequence is normalized against the total amount of bacterial gene sequences in a sample (Pfaffl et al., 2009). This allows correction of differences in total DNA concentrations between individual samples. In the experiments of this thesis (Paper 1‐ 6), we were interested in examining the difference in a given bacterial community between several samples rather than measuring the absolute quantity in each sample, consequently, relative quantities were used as calculation method for all qPCR data obtained in the experimental part. The procedure of qPCR and calculation of relative quantity are described in details in Paper 1‐ 6. 39

Methodology part<br />

6. Methodology, considerations and choices<br />

extraction methods and two <strong>of</strong> the major concerns important for accuracy <strong>of</strong> ecological studies<br />

are cell lysis efficiency and quality <strong>of</strong> DNA extracts (Li et al., 2003). DNA from organisms, which cell<br />

walls are easily lysed (Gram‐negative bacteria) can be sheared, if the extraction conditions are too<br />

rough. However, DNA can be difficult to recover from organisms with rigid cell walls (Gram‐<br />

positive bacteria), if the cell lysis is <strong>in</strong>sufficient. Additionally, it is important that extracted DNA is<br />

without unfavorable substances, because they may <strong>in</strong>hibit e.g. PCR amplification (Monteiro et al.,<br />

1997;Lantz et al., 1997). Mechanical disruption <strong>of</strong> human fecal samples prior extraction us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

QIAamp DNA stool M<strong>in</strong>iKit has previously shown to improve the amount and quality <strong>of</strong> DNA (Li et<br />

al., 2007;Smith et al., 2011). Thus, comb<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> these two methods allows effective lyses <strong>of</strong><br />

bacteria cells and removal <strong>of</strong> organic contam<strong>in</strong>ants lead<strong>in</strong>g to high quality DNA that can be further<br />

analyzed us<strong>in</strong>g down‐stream molecular techniques (Li et al., 2003). Prior to the <strong>in</strong> vitro studies<br />

performed <strong>in</strong> the experimental part <strong>of</strong> this thesis (Paper 2‐6), the comb<strong>in</strong>ed extraction method<br />

was validated by extract<strong>in</strong>g DNA from both fermentation samples at 0 hours and fecal samples<br />

(n=6, healthy subjects) to ensure that this method could yield the same amount <strong>of</strong> DNA from the<br />

different sample types. Eight bacterial groups (four Gram‐negative and four Gram‐positive<br />

bacteria) were quantified by qPCR to compare DNA extracted from either fermentation or fecal<br />

samples. The results demonstrated no significant difference between the two sample types for the<br />

eight bacterial taxa (Appendix 2). Hence, the comb<strong>in</strong>ed extraction method was used to extract<br />

DNA from both fecal and fermentation samples <strong>in</strong> the experiments <strong>of</strong> this thesis (Paper 2‐6).<br />

6.5. Quantitative Real-Time PCR<br />

QPCR is a useful tool for quantitative detection <strong>of</strong> target sequences <strong>in</strong> e.g. bacterial community,<br />

due to its high sensitivity. In qPCR, the accumulation <strong>of</strong> product amplification is detected by the<br />

presence <strong>of</strong> a fluorescence reporter. The quantification is done by measur<strong>in</strong>g the number <strong>of</strong> cycles<br />

required for fluorescent signal to reach a threshold level. The cycle number is proportional to the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> copies <strong>of</strong> DNA templates <strong>in</strong> a sample (Saunders, 2009). Different fluorescence reporters<br />

can be used <strong>in</strong> qPCR assay. One approached is the specific hybridization <strong>of</strong> a duallabelled TaqMan<br />

probe to PCR product. Another is based upon the b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the fluorescent dye SYBR‐Green <strong>in</strong>to<br />

the PCR product (Ponchel et al., 2003). SYBR‐Green was used as fluorescent reporter <strong>in</strong> the qPCR<br />

assays <strong>in</strong> Paper 1‐6.<br />

38

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!