05.02.2013 Views

Role of Intestinal Microbiota in Ulcerative Colitis

Role of Intestinal Microbiota in Ulcerative Colitis

Role of Intestinal Microbiota in Ulcerative Colitis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

6. Methodology, considerations and choices<br />

Methodology part<br />

6. Methodology, considerations and choices<br />

The methodologies used <strong>in</strong> the experimental part <strong>of</strong> this thesis were chosen <strong>in</strong> response to a<br />

number <strong>of</strong> circumstances and carefully balanced <strong>in</strong> order to meet the requirements <strong>of</strong> the overall<br />

project, this thesis is part <strong>of</strong>. The considerations and choices for the methods used are described <strong>in</strong><br />

the follow<strong>in</strong>g chapter.<br />

6.1. In vitro fermentation systems<br />

The preferred methods for test<strong>in</strong>g prebiotic properties <strong>of</strong> novel carbohydrates are animals studies<br />

or best humans trials us<strong>in</strong>g microbiological and immunological analysis. However, if a high number<br />

<strong>of</strong> carbohydrates is to be tested both economically and ethically, <strong>in</strong> vitro experiments can be used<br />

for screen<strong>in</strong>g, giv<strong>in</strong>g first <strong>in</strong>dications <strong>of</strong> prebiotic properties, even though the models have the<br />

limitations such as lack <strong>of</strong> host‐bacterial <strong>in</strong>teraction and absorptive processes (Rastall, 2007).<br />

6.2. Batch static systems<br />

In the present thesis, static batch systems were used to evaluate the prebiotic properties <strong>of</strong> novel<br />

carbohydrates derived from sugar beet and potato pulp pect<strong>in</strong>. However, several experimental<br />

parameters had to be determ<strong>in</strong>ed prior to screen<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Reaction volume<br />

The batch static system was chosen, s<strong>in</strong>ce a large number <strong>of</strong> prebiotic candidates were to be<br />

tested and, additionally only a low amount <strong>of</strong> the developed compounds was available. This also<br />

meant that the reaction volume had to be scaled down to 2 ml (50 ml is <strong>of</strong>ten used (Barry et al.,<br />

1995;Olano‐Mart<strong>in</strong> et al., 2000;Karpp<strong>in</strong>en et al., 2000)), and hence non‐pH controlled. Sanz et al.<br />

(2005) has previously developed a non‐pH controlled microscaled batch system us<strong>in</strong>g 1 ml <strong>of</strong><br />

reaction volume, which was validated aga<strong>in</strong>st a pH‐controlled batch system with larger reaction<br />

volume (150 ml). The down scal<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> volume allowed test<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> experimental saccharides, which<br />

were <strong>in</strong> limited supply.<br />

Incubation time<br />

An <strong>in</strong>cubation time <strong>of</strong> 24 hours was used, based on prelim<strong>in</strong>ary growth experiments on FOS (5 g/l<br />

and 10 g/l) us<strong>in</strong>g pure cultures <strong>of</strong> stra<strong>in</strong>s from the genera Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium,<br />

Clostridium and Bacteroides. The growth experiments showed that some <strong>of</strong> the species had a long<br />

lag‐phase and needed a period <strong>of</strong> 24 hours to reach exponential growth. However, an <strong>in</strong>cubation<br />

35

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!