Role of Intestinal Microbiota in Ulcerative Colitis
Role of Intestinal Microbiota in Ulcerative Colitis
Role of Intestinal Microbiota in Ulcerative Colitis
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
6. Methodology, considerations and choices<br />
Methodology part<br />
6. Methodology, considerations and choices<br />
The methodologies used <strong>in</strong> the experimental part <strong>of</strong> this thesis were chosen <strong>in</strong> response to a<br />
number <strong>of</strong> circumstances and carefully balanced <strong>in</strong> order to meet the requirements <strong>of</strong> the overall<br />
project, this thesis is part <strong>of</strong>. The considerations and choices for the methods used are described <strong>in</strong><br />
the follow<strong>in</strong>g chapter.<br />
6.1. In vitro fermentation systems<br />
The preferred methods for test<strong>in</strong>g prebiotic properties <strong>of</strong> novel carbohydrates are animals studies<br />
or best humans trials us<strong>in</strong>g microbiological and immunological analysis. However, if a high number<br />
<strong>of</strong> carbohydrates is to be tested both economically and ethically, <strong>in</strong> vitro experiments can be used<br />
for screen<strong>in</strong>g, giv<strong>in</strong>g first <strong>in</strong>dications <strong>of</strong> prebiotic properties, even though the models have the<br />
limitations such as lack <strong>of</strong> host‐bacterial <strong>in</strong>teraction and absorptive processes (Rastall, 2007).<br />
6.2. Batch static systems<br />
In the present thesis, static batch systems were used to evaluate the prebiotic properties <strong>of</strong> novel<br />
carbohydrates derived from sugar beet and potato pulp pect<strong>in</strong>. However, several experimental<br />
parameters had to be determ<strong>in</strong>ed prior to screen<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Reaction volume<br />
The batch static system was chosen, s<strong>in</strong>ce a large number <strong>of</strong> prebiotic candidates were to be<br />
tested and, additionally only a low amount <strong>of</strong> the developed compounds was available. This also<br />
meant that the reaction volume had to be scaled down to 2 ml (50 ml is <strong>of</strong>ten used (Barry et al.,<br />
1995;Olano‐Mart<strong>in</strong> et al., 2000;Karpp<strong>in</strong>en et al., 2000)), and hence non‐pH controlled. Sanz et al.<br />
(2005) has previously developed a non‐pH controlled microscaled batch system us<strong>in</strong>g 1 ml <strong>of</strong><br />
reaction volume, which was validated aga<strong>in</strong>st a pH‐controlled batch system with larger reaction<br />
volume (150 ml). The down scal<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> volume allowed test<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> experimental saccharides, which<br />
were <strong>in</strong> limited supply.<br />
Incubation time<br />
An <strong>in</strong>cubation time <strong>of</strong> 24 hours was used, based on prelim<strong>in</strong>ary growth experiments on FOS (5 g/l<br />
and 10 g/l) us<strong>in</strong>g pure cultures <strong>of</strong> stra<strong>in</strong>s from the genera Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium,<br />
Clostridium and Bacteroides. The growth experiments showed that some <strong>of</strong> the species had a long<br />
lag‐phase and needed a period <strong>of</strong> 24 hours to reach exponential growth. However, an <strong>in</strong>cubation<br />
35