Role of Intestinal Microbiota in Ulcerative Colitis

Role of Intestinal Microbiota in Ulcerative Colitis Role of Intestinal Microbiota in Ulcerative Colitis

05.02.2013 Views

Theoretical part Figure 4: Location of UC in the different colon regions (Longstreth et al., 2010) 16 3. Inflammatory Bowel disease The factors responsible for the initiation and perpetuation of UC are unknown (Loftus, 2004;Sartor, 2006). However, evidence suggests that the colonic host‐bacterial interaction and microbial composition play a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of UC. Firstly, the colon is the area of the gut with the highest bacterial concentrations (section 1.1) and is also the site where inflammation occurs in UC patients. Secondly, genetically engineered germ‐free mice, rats, and guinea pigs completely lack enterocolitis but develop intestinal inflammation within 1 – 4 weeks if they are colonized with conventional gut bacteria (Himmel et al., 2008;Sartor, 2008). Thirdly, clinical studies have revealed that some PRRs have gene mutations (e.g. TRL9) or an increased expression on IECs (e.g. TLR2 and TLR4) in UC patients (De Jager et al., 2007;Frolova et al., 2008;Fuse et al., 2010), and finally, studies have shown that UC patients in relapse have a colonic mucus layer that has an altered O‐glycan profile and is significantly thinner compared to healthy subjects (Pullan et al., 1994;Larsson et al., 2011). Thus, gut host‐bacterial interaction seems to be disturbed in UC, which may have consequences for the composition of the gut commensal bacteria. 3.2. Alteration in the bacterial community of ulcerative colitis patients Compositional changes in the colonic microbiota have been observed when comparing fecal and mucosal samples from UC patients to that of healthy subjects (Lepage et al., 2005;Frank et al., 2007;Takaishi et al., 2008;Sokol et al., 2009;Qin et al., 2010). Studies have demonstrated that the fecal and mucosal amount of Firmicutes was significantly lower in UC patients than in healthy subjects (Frank et al., 2007;Sokol et al., 2009). This was also applicable for the two dominant

Theoretical part 17 3. Inflammatory Bowel disease clostridial groups within the Firmicutes phylum, Clostridium coccoides group and Clostridium leptum subgroup (Frank et al., 2007;Takaishi et al., 2008;Sokol et al., 2009). Takiashi et al. (2008) have also shown that these two clostridial groups were significantly less abundant in fecal samples from UC patients in relapse compared to UC patients in remission. Studies have also demonstrated that the Bacteroidetes phylum was underrepresented in mucosal samples from UC patients compared to healthy subjects (Ott et al., 2004;Frank et al., 2007), and that the amount of Bacteroides fragilis group was low in fecal and mucosal samples from UC patients (Takaishi et al., 2008). A common genus from the gut community, Bifidobacterium spp., has shown to be underrepresented in mucosal and fecal samples from UC patients compared to healthy subjects (Macfarlane et al., 2004;Mylonaki et al., 2005;Sokol et al., 2009). Additionally, Mylonaki et al. (2005) revealed that bifidobacteria were significantly less abundant in mucosal samples from UC patients in remission and relapse than in healthy subjects. Bacteria that have shown to be increased in mucosal samples from UC patients than in healthy subjects include the sulphate‐ reducing bacteria Desulfovibrio spp. (belongs to the delta proteobacteria) (Rowan et al., 2010), and the phylum Proteobacteria (Lepage et al., 2005;Frank et al., 2007).

Theoretical part<br />

Figure 4: Location <strong>of</strong> UC <strong>in</strong> the different colon regions (Longstreth et al., 2010)<br />

16<br />

3. Inflammatory Bowel disease<br />

The factors responsible for the <strong>in</strong>itiation and perpetuation <strong>of</strong> UC are unknown (L<strong>of</strong>tus,<br />

2004;Sartor, 2006). However, evidence suggests that the colonic host‐bacterial <strong>in</strong>teraction and<br />

microbial composition play a pivotal role <strong>in</strong> the pathogenesis <strong>of</strong> UC. Firstly, the colon is the area <strong>of</strong><br />

the gut with the highest bacterial concentrations (section 1.1) and is also the site where<br />

<strong>in</strong>flammation occurs <strong>in</strong> UC patients. Secondly, genetically eng<strong>in</strong>eered germ‐free mice, rats, and<br />

gu<strong>in</strong>ea pigs completely lack enterocolitis but develop <strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>al <strong>in</strong>flammation with<strong>in</strong> 1 – 4 weeks if<br />

they are colonized with conventional gut bacteria (Himmel et al., 2008;Sartor, 2008). Thirdly,<br />

cl<strong>in</strong>ical studies have revealed that some PRRs have gene mutations (e.g. TRL9) or an <strong>in</strong>creased<br />

expression on IECs (e.g. TLR2 and TLR4) <strong>in</strong> UC patients (De Jager et al., 2007;Frolova et al.,<br />

2008;Fuse et al., 2010), and f<strong>in</strong>ally, studies have shown that UC patients <strong>in</strong> relapse have a colonic<br />

mucus layer that has an altered O‐glycan pr<strong>of</strong>ile and is significantly th<strong>in</strong>ner compared to healthy<br />

subjects (Pullan et al., 1994;Larsson et al., 2011). Thus, gut host‐bacterial <strong>in</strong>teraction seems to be<br />

disturbed <strong>in</strong> UC, which may have consequences for the composition <strong>of</strong> the gut commensal<br />

bacteria.<br />

3.2. Alteration <strong>in</strong> the bacterial community <strong>of</strong> ulcerative colitis patients<br />

Compositional changes <strong>in</strong> the colonic microbiota have been observed when compar<strong>in</strong>g fecal and<br />

mucosal samples from UC patients to that <strong>of</strong> healthy subjects (Lepage et al., 2005;Frank et al.,<br />

2007;Takaishi et al., 2008;Sokol et al., 2009;Q<strong>in</strong> et al., 2010). Studies have demonstrated that the<br />

fecal and mucosal amount <strong>of</strong> Firmicutes was significantly lower <strong>in</strong> UC patients than <strong>in</strong> healthy<br />

subjects (Frank et al., 2007;Sokol et al., 2009). This was also applicable for the two dom<strong>in</strong>ant

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!