Role of Intestinal Microbiota in Ulcerative Colitis
Role of Intestinal Microbiota in Ulcerative Colitis Role of Intestinal Microbiota in Ulcerative Colitis
884 Appl Microbiol Biotechnol (2011) 90:873–884 Rycroft CE, Jones MR, Gibson GR, Rastall RA (2001) A comparative in vitro evaluation of the fermentation properties of prebiotic oligosaccharides. J Appl Microbiol 91:878–887 Sanz ML, Gibson GR, Rastall RA (2005) Influence of disaccharide structure on prebiotic selectivity in vitro. J Agric Food Chem 53:5192–5199 Sokol H, Seksik P, Furet JP, Firmesse O, Nion-Larmurier L, Beaugerie L, Cosnes J, Corthier G, Marteau P, Dore J (2009) Low counts of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii in colitis microbiota. Inflamm Bowel Dis 15:1183–1189 Stratton J, Chiruvolu V, Meagher M (1998) High cell-density fermentation. In: Pichia protocols, 103rd edn. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, pp 107–120 Thomassen LV, Meyer AS (2010) Statistically designed optimisation of enzyme catalysed starch removal from potato pulp. Enzyme Microb Technol 46:297–303 Turnbaugh PJ, Ley RE, Mahowald MA, Magrini V, Mardis ER, Gordon JI (2006) An obesity-associated gut microbiome with increased capacity for energy harvest. Nature 444:1027– 1031 Van den Broek LAM, denAantrekker ED, Voragen AGJ, Beldman G, Vincken JP (1997) Pectin lyase is a key enzyme in the maceration of potato tuber. J Sci Food Agric 75:167–172 Van Laere KMJ, Hartemink R, Bosveld M, Schols HA, Voragen AGJ (2000) Fermentation of plant cell wall derived polysaccharides and their corresponding oligosaccharides by intestinal bacteria. J Agric Food Chem 48:1644–1652 Walter J, Tannock GW, Tilsala-Timisjarvi A, Rodtong S, Loach DM, Munro K, Alatossava T (2000) Detection and identification of gastrointestinal Lactobacillus species by using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and species-specific PCR primers. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:297–303
Methodology part Paper 6 Tailored enzymatic production of oligosaccharides from sugar beet pectin and Paper 6 evidence of differential effects of a single DP chain length difference human fecal microbiota composition after in vitro fermentation. Published in Process Biochemistry (Page numbers are relative to paper) 135
- Page 101 and 102: that C. coccoides group and C. lept
- Page 103 and 104: Table 1 ‐ 16S rRNA gene of phylum
- Page 105 and 106: Table 2 ‐ Preference of bacterial
- Page 107 and 108: Figure 1. A) Schematic overview of
- Page 109 and 110: A. B. Figure 3. Principal component
- Page 111 and 112: 15. Fooks LJ, Gibson GR. (2002) In
- Page 113 and 114: 47. Ouwehand AC, Suomalainen T, Tol
- Page 115 and 116: Methodology part Paper 3 Paper 3 In
- Page 117 and 118: APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOL
- Page 119 and 120: 8338 VIGSNÆS ET AL. APPL. ENVIRON.
- Page 121 and 122: 8340 VIGSNÆS ET AL. APPL. ENVIRON.
- Page 123 and 124: 8342 VIGSNÆS ET AL. APPL. ENVIRON.
- Page 125: 8344 VIGSNÆS ET AL. APPL. ENVIRON.
- Page 128 and 129: Methodology part Introduction The a
- Page 130 and 131: Journal of Agricultural and Food Ch
- Page 132 and 133: Journal of Agricultural and Food Ch
- Page 134 and 135: Journal of Agricultural and Food Ch
- Page 136 and 137: Journal of Agricultural and Food Ch
- Page 139 and 140: Methodology part Paper 5 Paper 5 Ma
- Page 141 and 142: Appl Microbiol Biotechnol (2011) 90
- Page 143 and 144: Appl Microbiol Biotechnol (2011) 90
- Page 145 and 146: Appl Microbiol Biotechnol (2011) 90
- Page 147 and 148: Appl Microbiol Biotechnol (2011) 90
- Page 149 and 150: Appl Microbiol Biotechnol (2011) 90
- Page 151: Appl Microbiol Biotechnol (2011) 90
- Page 155 and 156: Process Biochemistry 46 (2011) 1039
- Page 157 and 158: Table 1 List of enzymes. Enzyme Sou
- Page 159 and 160: J. Holck et al. / Process Biochemis
- Page 161 and 162: Intensity 50 0 C1 175.05 J. Holck e
- Page 163 and 164: J. Holck et al. / Process Biochemis
- Page 165: [29] Bauer S, Vasu P, Persson S, Mo
- Page 168 and 169: Methodology part 150
- Page 170 and 171: Methodology part 152 Appendix 1 hor
- Page 172 and 173: Appendix 3 Methodology part Appendi
- Page 174 and 175: Methodology part 156 Appendix 3
- Page 177 and 178: 7. Discussion and perspectives Disc
- Page 179 and 180: Discussion and conclusion 161 7. Di
- Page 181 and 182: Discussion and conclusion 163 7. Di
- Page 183 and 184: Discussion and conclusion 165 7. Di
- Page 185 and 186: References References Abreu,M.T., V
- Page 187 and 188: References Derrien,M., Vaughan,E.E.
- Page 189 and 190: References Haarman,M. and Knol,J. (
- Page 191 and 192: References Lantz,P.G., Matsson,M.,
- Page 193 and 194: References Matsuki,T., Watanabe,K.,
- Page 195 and 196: References Pullan,R.D., Thomas,G.A.
- Page 197 and 198: References Tannock,G.W. (2010). Ana
- Page 200: National Food Institute Technical U
Methodology part<br />
Paper 6<br />
Tailored enzymatic production <strong>of</strong> oligosaccharides from sugar beet pect<strong>in</strong> and<br />
Paper 6<br />
evidence <strong>of</strong> differential effects <strong>of</strong> a s<strong>in</strong>gle DP cha<strong>in</strong> length difference human fecal<br />
microbiota composition after <strong>in</strong> vitro fermentation.<br />
Published <strong>in</strong><br />
Process Biochemistry<br />
(Page numbers are relative to paper)<br />
135
Change language