Role of Intestinal Microbiota in Ulcerative Colitis
Role of Intestinal Microbiota in Ulcerative Colitis Role of Intestinal Microbiota in Ulcerative Colitis
880 Appl Microbiol Biotechnol (2011) 90:873–884 Fig. 4 Released dry matter from destarched potato pulp at pH 6.0 and 60 °C by applying a no enzyme or one enzyme or b different combinations of different enzymes Biological activity Yield (% (w/w) dry matter) After fermentation in fecal slurries obtained from three different subjects, quantitative real-time PCR was applied to measure the density of gene targets encoding 16 S rRNA of selected bacterial taxonomic units (Fig. 6). The ability of the released fibers (Table 4) to selectively stimulate the growth of the given bacterial taxa was compared to that of FOS. The fecal communities fermented on CPP>100 had a significantly higher content of Bifidobacterium than the same fecal communities fermented on FOS (P100kDa
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol (2011) 90:873–884 881 Table 5 Carbohydrate and protein content in the fiber released from potato pulp by the minimal procedure: 1% (w/w) potato pulp treated with 1.0% (w/w) E/ S PL1 and 1% (w/w) E/S PG2 at pH 6.0 and 60 °C for 1 min higher temperature was chosen to minimize the risk of microbial growth. Approximately 21–22% by weight of the crude (dry) potato pulp is starch (Thomassen and Meyer 2010). The optimization experiments were carried outondestarchedpotatopulptoavoidinterferencefrom starch on the enzymatic release and the in vitro fermentation. The same amount of dry matter was released from destarched and crude potato pulp by applying the minimal procedure, indicating that the remaining starch polymers in crude potato pulp were insoluble. Release of fiber from potato pulp by Viscozyme® L It has been shown that it is possible to release 28% by weight of dry matter from destarched potato pulp by and optimized Viscozyme® L treatment (Meyer et al. 2009). The experiment was repeated during this study, but the amount of released dry matter was insignificant as compared to the amount released by the minimal procedure. The difference might be due to the Viscozyme® preparation comprising a number of pectinolytic activities vatalyzing the degradation of the fibers to a low molecular size, not able to be precipitated by isopropanol and thereby determined by the present method. Release of fibers from potato pulp without addition of enzyme When destarched potato pulp was incubated at pH 6 and 60 °C for 1 min 41% by weight of the dry matter was released Fig. 5 Size exclusion chromatogram of the fractions released from potato pulp % (mole) DNE DPP CNE CPP CPP10–100 CPP>100 Glucose 18.1±0.4 10.0±0.5 11.7±0.7 4.8±0.1 10.1±0.5 7.1±1.0 Rhamnose 1.4±0.1 1.3±0.1 1.5±0.1 1.3±0.1 1.4±0.1 1.7±0.3 Galacturonic acid 16.7±0.4 18.5±2.4 14.7±2.8 22.7±1.3 47.7±5.6 13.6±5.0 Galactose 54.8±2.7 58.3±1.2 62.7±3.4 59.1±0.3 32.4±0.4 65.5±0.7 Arabinose 9.0±1.9 9.6±1.2 9.5±1.3 8.6±1.2 3.7±0.7 8.5±0.8 Mannose 0.0±0.0 0.0±0.0 0.0±0.0 1.1±0.1 3.3±0.2 2.3±0.3 Protein n.d. 2.3 n.d. 1.7 1.5 1.4 (Fig. 4b). A similar amount of dry matter was released from crude potato pulp (data not shown) eliminating the possibility that the enzyme used for starch removal caused the increased amount of released dry matter. The possible influence of divalent cations viz. chelation might play a role, but this hypothesis requires further experimental substantiation. Characterization of the released fibers The monosaccharide compositions indicated that CPP10–100 and CPP>100 were mainly made up of homogalacturonan and rhamnogalacturonan I polysaccharides, respectively. The monosaccharide composition and size-exclusion chromatogram indicated that CPP>100 mainly consisted of polysaccharides of homogalacturonan and rhamnogalacturonan I with large galactan side chains. This is in complete accordance with the data obtained with Viscozyme® L treatment on destarched potato pulp (Meyer et al. 2009) and the tentative conclusion that the enzymatically released high molecular weight fraction contained relatively large galactan side chains (Meyer et al. 2009). Biological activity The bioactivity of the released fibers (Table 5) was tested by fermentation in fecal bacterial communities obtained from three healthy human subjects. The effect of the fibers on the content of Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus was compared to the effect of FOS. FOS was used as a standard
- Page 97 and 98: Microbial community analysis using
- Page 99 and 100: difference from the luminal microbi
- Page 101 and 102: that C. coccoides group and C. lept
- Page 103 and 104: Table 1 ‐ 16S rRNA gene of phylum
- Page 105 and 106: Table 2 ‐ Preference of bacterial
- Page 107 and 108: Figure 1. A) Schematic overview of
- Page 109 and 110: A. B. Figure 3. Principal component
- Page 111 and 112: 15. Fooks LJ, Gibson GR. (2002) In
- Page 113 and 114: 47. Ouwehand AC, Suomalainen T, Tol
- Page 115 and 116: Methodology part Paper 3 Paper 3 In
- Page 117 and 118: APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOL
- Page 119 and 120: 8338 VIGSNÆS ET AL. APPL. ENVIRON.
- Page 121 and 122: 8340 VIGSNÆS ET AL. APPL. ENVIRON.
- Page 123 and 124: 8342 VIGSNÆS ET AL. APPL. ENVIRON.
- Page 125: 8344 VIGSNÆS ET AL. APPL. ENVIRON.
- Page 128 and 129: Methodology part Introduction The a
- Page 130 and 131: Journal of Agricultural and Food Ch
- Page 132 and 133: Journal of Agricultural and Food Ch
- Page 134 and 135: Journal of Agricultural and Food Ch
- Page 136 and 137: Journal of Agricultural and Food Ch
- Page 139 and 140: Methodology part Paper 5 Paper 5 Ma
- Page 141 and 142: Appl Microbiol Biotechnol (2011) 90
- Page 143 and 144: Appl Microbiol Biotechnol (2011) 90
- Page 145 and 146: Appl Microbiol Biotechnol (2011) 90
- Page 147: Appl Microbiol Biotechnol (2011) 90
- Page 151 and 152: Appl Microbiol Biotechnol (2011) 90
- Page 153 and 154: Methodology part Paper 6 Tailored e
- Page 155 and 156: Process Biochemistry 46 (2011) 1039
- Page 157 and 158: Table 1 List of enzymes. Enzyme Sou
- Page 159 and 160: J. Holck et al. / Process Biochemis
- Page 161 and 162: Intensity 50 0 C1 175.05 J. Holck e
- Page 163 and 164: J. Holck et al. / Process Biochemis
- Page 165: [29] Bauer S, Vasu P, Persson S, Mo
- Page 168 and 169: Methodology part 150
- Page 170 and 171: Methodology part 152 Appendix 1 hor
- Page 172 and 173: Appendix 3 Methodology part Appendi
- Page 174 and 175: Methodology part 156 Appendix 3
- Page 177 and 178: 7. Discussion and perspectives Disc
- Page 179 and 180: Discussion and conclusion 161 7. Di
- Page 181 and 182: Discussion and conclusion 163 7. Di
- Page 183 and 184: Discussion and conclusion 165 7. Di
- Page 185 and 186: References References Abreu,M.T., V
- Page 187 and 188: References Derrien,M., Vaughan,E.E.
- Page 189 and 190: References Haarman,M. and Knol,J. (
- Page 191 and 192: References Lantz,P.G., Matsson,M.,
- Page 193 and 194: References Matsuki,T., Watanabe,K.,
- Page 195 and 196: References Pullan,R.D., Thomas,G.A.
- Page 197 and 198: References Tannock,G.W. (2010). Ana
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol (2011) 90:873–884 881<br />
Table 5 Carbohydrate and prote<strong>in</strong><br />
content <strong>in</strong> the fiber released<br />
from potato pulp by the m<strong>in</strong>imal<br />
procedure: 1% (w/w) potato<br />
pulp treated with 1.0% (w/w) E/<br />
S PL1 and 1% (w/w) E/S PG2 at<br />
pH 6.0 and 60 °C for 1 m<strong>in</strong><br />
higher temperature was chosen to m<strong>in</strong>imize the risk <strong>of</strong><br />
microbial growth. Approximately 21–22% by weight <strong>of</strong><br />
the crude (dry) potato pulp is starch (Thomassen and<br />
Meyer 2010). The optimization experiments were carried<br />
outondestarchedpotatopulptoavoid<strong>in</strong>terferencefrom<br />
starch on the enzymatic release and the <strong>in</strong> vitro fermentation.<br />
The same amount <strong>of</strong> dry matter was released from<br />
destarched and crude potato pulp by apply<strong>in</strong>g the m<strong>in</strong>imal<br />
procedure, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that the rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g starch polymers<br />
<strong>in</strong> crude potato pulp were <strong>in</strong>soluble.<br />
Release <strong>of</strong> fiber from potato pulp by Viscozyme® L<br />
It has been shown that it is possible to release 28% by<br />
weight <strong>of</strong> dry matter from destarched potato pulp by and<br />
optimized Viscozyme® L treatment (Meyer et al. 2009).<br />
The experiment was repeated dur<strong>in</strong>g this study, but the<br />
amount <strong>of</strong> released dry matter was <strong>in</strong>significant as<br />
compared to the amount released by the m<strong>in</strong>imal procedure.<br />
The difference might be due to the Viscozyme® preparation<br />
compris<strong>in</strong>g a number <strong>of</strong> pect<strong>in</strong>olytic activities vatalyz<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the degradation <strong>of</strong> the fibers to a low molecular size, not able<br />
to be precipitated by isopropanol and thereby determ<strong>in</strong>ed by<br />
the present method.<br />
Release <strong>of</strong> fibers from potato pulp without addition <strong>of</strong> enzyme<br />
When destarched potato pulp was <strong>in</strong>cubated at pH 6 and 60 °C<br />
for 1 m<strong>in</strong> 41% by weight <strong>of</strong> the dry matter was released<br />
Fig. 5 Size exclusion<br />
chromatogram <strong>of</strong> the fractions<br />
released from potato pulp<br />
% (mole) DNE DPP CNE CPP CPP10–100 CPP>100<br />
Glucose 18.1±0.4 10.0±0.5 11.7±0.7 4.8±0.1 10.1±0.5 7.1±1.0<br />
Rhamnose 1.4±0.1 1.3±0.1 1.5±0.1 1.3±0.1 1.4±0.1 1.7±0.3<br />
Galacturonic acid 16.7±0.4 18.5±2.4 14.7±2.8 22.7±1.3 47.7±5.6 13.6±5.0<br />
Galactose 54.8±2.7 58.3±1.2 62.7±3.4 59.1±0.3 32.4±0.4 65.5±0.7<br />
Arab<strong>in</strong>ose 9.0±1.9 9.6±1.2 9.5±1.3 8.6±1.2 3.7±0.7 8.5±0.8<br />
Mannose 0.0±0.0 0.0±0.0 0.0±0.0 1.1±0.1 3.3±0.2 2.3±0.3<br />
Prote<strong>in</strong> n.d. 2.3 n.d. 1.7 1.5 1.4<br />
(Fig. 4b). A similar amount <strong>of</strong> dry matter was released from<br />
crude potato pulp (data not shown) elim<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g the possibility<br />
that the enzyme used for starch removal caused the <strong>in</strong>creased<br />
amount <strong>of</strong> released dry matter. The possible <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>of</strong><br />
divalent cations viz. chelation might play a role, but this<br />
hypothesis requires further experimental substantiation.<br />
Characterization <strong>of</strong> the released fibers<br />
The monosaccharide compositions <strong>in</strong>dicated that CPP10–100<br />
and CPP>100 were ma<strong>in</strong>ly made up <strong>of</strong> homogalacturonan<br />
and rhamnogalacturonan I polysaccharides, respectively. The<br />
monosaccharide composition and size-exclusion chromatogram<br />
<strong>in</strong>dicated that CPP>100 ma<strong>in</strong>ly consisted <strong>of</strong> polysaccharides<br />
<strong>of</strong> homogalacturonan and rhamnogalacturonan I with<br />
large galactan side cha<strong>in</strong>s. This is <strong>in</strong> complete accordance<br />
with the data obta<strong>in</strong>ed with Viscozyme® L treatment on<br />
destarched potato pulp (Meyer et al. 2009) and the tentative<br />
conclusion that the enzymatically released high molecular<br />
weight fraction conta<strong>in</strong>ed relatively large galactan side<br />
cha<strong>in</strong>s (Meyer et al. 2009).<br />
Biological activity<br />
The bioactivity <strong>of</strong> the released fibers (Table 5) was tested<br />
by fermentation <strong>in</strong> fecal bacterial communities obta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
from three healthy human subjects. The effect <strong>of</strong> the fibers<br />
on the content <strong>of</strong> Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus was<br />
compared to the effect <strong>of</strong> FOS. FOS was used as a standard